<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hey Nokia: Check out how responsive Windows Mobile 6.0 is</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.intomobile.com/2007/01/06/hey-nokia-check-out-how-responsive-windows-mobile-60-is.html/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2007/01/06/hey-nokia-check-out-how-responsive-windows-mobile-60-is.html</link>
	<description>Cell Phone News, Information, and Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 22:02:56 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Antony Pranata</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2007/01/06/hey-nokia-check-out-how-responsive-windows-mobile-60-is.html/comment-page-1/#comment-11218</link>
		<dc:creator>Antony Pranata</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 22:11:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/2007/01/06/hey-nokia-check-out-how-responsive-windows-mobile-60-is.html#comment-11218</guid>
		<description>I agree with lutz, normally WiMo requires higher processor speed and more RAM. That&#039;s why it &quot;looks&quot; like it runs faster than any Symbian OS phones.
However, I agree that we need some &quot;optimization&quot; on Symbian OS.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with lutz, normally WiMo requires higher processor speed and more RAM. That&#8217;s why it &#8220;looks&#8221; like it runs faster than any Symbian OS phones.<br />
However, I agree that we need some &#8220;optimization&#8221; on Symbian OS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lutzs</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2007/01/06/hey-nokia-check-out-how-responsive-windows-mobile-60-is.html/comment-page-1/#comment-11217</link>
		<dc:creator>lutzs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 10:25:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/2007/01/06/hey-nokia-check-out-how-responsive-windows-mobile-60-is.html#comment-11217</guid>
		<description>Hey this demo is running on the HTC Universal, it has 520 Mhz...
On a Omap TI with 200 Mhz it will be fucking slow like WM5.

I&#039;m a long time Windows Mobile User, but since i bought my E61, i love Symbian.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey this demo is running on the HTC Universal, it has 520 Mhz&#8230;<br />
On a Omap TI with 200 Mhz it will be fucking slow like WM5.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a long time Windows Mobile User, but since i bought my E61, i love Symbian.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: designfreak</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2007/01/06/hey-nokia-check-out-how-responsive-windows-mobile-60-is.html/comment-page-1/#comment-11216</link>
		<dc:creator>designfreak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 07:57:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/2007/01/06/hey-nokia-check-out-how-responsive-windows-mobile-60-is.html#comment-11216</guid>
		<description>it&#039;s not fake..
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mobile-review.com/pda/articles/wm-crossbow-en.shtml&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.mobile-review.com/pda/articles/wm-crossbow-en.shtml&lt;/a&gt;

i like the today screen but the other menus are still ugly like WM5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s not fake..<br />
<a href="http://www.mobile-review.com/pda/articles/wm-crossbow-en.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.mobile-review.com/pda/articles/wm-crossbow-en.shtml</a></p>
<p>i like the today screen but the other menus are still ugly like WM5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: n800000000</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2007/01/06/hey-nokia-check-out-how-responsive-windows-mobile-60-is.html/comment-page-1/#comment-11215</link>
		<dc:creator>n800000000</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 07:26:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/2007/01/06/hey-nokia-check-out-how-responsive-windows-mobile-60-is.html#comment-11215</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think this is real. It appears to just be a skin. The fact that he plays stupid sounds for 3/4 of the video is evidence enough that this is fake.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think this is real. It appears to just be a skin. The fact that he plays stupid sounds for 3/4 of the video is evidence enough that this is fake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Viipottaja</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2007/01/06/hey-nokia-check-out-how-responsive-windows-mobile-60-is.html/comment-page-1/#comment-11214</link>
		<dc:creator>Viipottaja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 21:14:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/2007/01/06/hey-nokia-check-out-how-responsive-windows-mobile-60-is.html#comment-11214</guid>
		<description>The screen looks huge.. wonder what it is running on it the demo? I.e. one possibility is of course that it can be snappy as hell in the lab, but maybe not so on an actual consumer product.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The screen looks huge.. wonder what it is running on it the demo? I.e. one possibility is of course that it can be snappy as hell in the lab, but maybe not so on an actual consumer product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
