Image Comparison: Nikon Coolpix 5000 vs Nokia N93
By Stefan Constantinescu on Tuesday, January 16th, 2007 at 1:44 PM PST In Uncategorized
Conclusion: The N93 pictures needed to be touched up before getting remotely close to the quality of a Nikon.
Check out this short duel over at The Creative Life
I personally can’t wait to see how the N95 stacks up against a decent point and shoot. I also have to wonder why Nokia (NYSE: NOK) is using Carl Zeiss optics? There are better solutions out there. COUGH Canon COUGH
Via: WOM World
‘Th short duel’, now why didn’t I think of that? That’s a much better name for the shot out!
Oh dear . . . why is my typing so poor? Sorry. Obviously I meant ‘The short duel’ and ’shoot out’. :0(
hehe don’t worry about it
if it wasn’t for firefox 2 or microsoft word i would be labeled an analphabet by now
Carl Zeiss has big time brand recognition :-/ Same reason Sony uses them, I imagine..
Yea and do you see people serious about photography buying Sony cameras …
Nikon, Canon, Leica, Sigma: these are brands that I associate with photography.
not carl zeiss