<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nokia camera phones simply aren&#8217;t suited for flesh tones</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.intomobile.com/2007/02/17/nokia-camera-phones-simply-arent-suited-for-flesh-tones.html/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2007/02/17/nokia-camera-phones-simply-arent-suited-for-flesh-tones.html</link>
	<description>Cell Phone News, Information, and Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 14:06:50 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Henrikki</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2007/02/17/nokia-camera-phones-simply-arent-suited-for-flesh-tones.html/comment-page-1/#comment-11910</link>
		<dc:creator>Henrikki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 19:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/2007/02/17/nokia-camera-phones-simply-arent-suited-for-flesh-tones.html#comment-11910</guid>
		<description>I think you can find problems in every device. I&#039;m not sure how important these kind of comparisons are. Every situation has it own difficulties and each device have their strong and weak points and will therefore handle them differently.

I&#039;m not into these. I&#039;m satisfied when there is enough details with good focus. We are talking about phones after all. The Canon is as big as N93/N93i and weights at least as much. It should make better work with photography.

 

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you can find problems in every device. I&#8217;m not sure how important these kind of comparisons are. Every situation has it own difficulties and each device have their strong and weak points and will therefore handle them differently.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not into these. I&#8217;m satisfied when there is enough details with good focus. We are talking about phones after all. The Canon is as big as N93/N93i and weights at least as much. It should make better work with photography.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ricky Cadden</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2007/02/17/nokia-camera-phones-simply-arent-suited-for-flesh-tones.html/comment-page-1/#comment-11909</link>
		<dc:creator>Ricky Cadden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 14:17:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/2007/02/17/nokia-camera-phones-simply-arent-suited-for-flesh-tones.html#comment-11909</guid>
		<description>I much prefer having my phone as my only camera for a few reasons. One, like you said, instant uploading to wherever I want. However, I think it&#039;s also important to ask what do you do with the photos? If you&#039;re a printer, then yeah, high quality is key. But if you&#039;re like me and just upload them to share with friends online, or keep them on your computer to flip through randomly, then the quality between say, your Canon and my N73, in opinion, is negligible. 

Just a thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I much prefer having my phone as my only camera for a few reasons. One, like you said, instant uploading to wherever I want. However, I think it&#8217;s also important to ask what do you do with the photos? If you&#8217;re a printer, then yeah, high quality is key. But if you&#8217;re like me and just upload them to share with friends online, or keep them on your computer to flip through randomly, then the quality between say, your Canon and my N73, in opinion, is negligible. </p>
<p>Just a thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stefan Constantinescu</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2007/02/17/nokia-camera-phones-simply-arent-suited-for-flesh-tones.html/comment-page-1/#comment-11908</link>
		<dc:creator>Stefan Constantinescu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 07:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/2007/02/17/nokia-camera-phones-simply-arent-suited-for-flesh-tones.html#comment-11908</guid>
		<description>It had to be my light fixtures or the light bulbs.

Maybe it is my Canon?

Everything was set to automatic however.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It had to be my light fixtures or the light bulbs.</p>
<p>Maybe it is my Canon?</p>
<p>Everything was set to automatic however.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PlayerKill</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2007/02/17/nokia-camera-phones-simply-arent-suited-for-flesh-tones.html/comment-page-1/#comment-11907</link>
		<dc:creator>PlayerKill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 06:38:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/2007/02/17/nokia-camera-phones-simply-arent-suited-for-flesh-tones.html#comment-11907</guid>
		<description>This makes me wonder. I see that the photos produced from your Canon is yellowish in both this and the pic qith your hand. Did you set the whiteball incorrectly, not to automatic? :/ There&#039;s no way a point and shoot will not change the whiteball and creates this yellowish photo in automatic, unless you are in a room with some yellow light (your N93i doesn&#039;t suggest you are in such a room).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This makes me wonder. I see that the photos produced from your Canon is yellowish in both this and the pic qith your hand. Did you set the whiteball incorrectly, not to automatic? :/ There&#8217;s no way a point and shoot will not change the whiteball and creates this yellowish photo in automatic, unless you are in a room with some yellow light (your N93i doesn&#8217;t suggest you are in such a room).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: romeo26</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2007/02/17/nokia-camera-phones-simply-arent-suited-for-flesh-tones.html/comment-page-1/#comment-11906</link>
		<dc:creator>romeo26</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 02:53:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/2007/02/17/nokia-camera-phones-simply-arent-suited-for-flesh-tones.html#comment-11906</guid>
		<description>i like the color from the n93i, but i also like the sharpness from the canon!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i like the color from the n93i, but i also like the sharpness from the canon!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LosOutlandos</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2007/02/17/nokia-camera-phones-simply-arent-suited-for-flesh-tones.html/comment-page-1/#comment-11905</link>
		<dc:creator>LosOutlandos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 02:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/2007/02/17/nokia-camera-phones-simply-arent-suited-for-flesh-tones.html#comment-11905</guid>
		<description>just noticed: you look exactly like sgt. winters from &quot;band of brothers&quot;!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just noticed: you look exactly like sgt. winters from &#8220;band of brothers&#8221;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James @ The Creative Life</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2007/02/17/nokia-camera-phones-simply-arent-suited-for-flesh-tones.html/comment-page-1/#comment-11904</link>
		<dc:creator>James @ The Creative Life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 00:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/2007/02/17/nokia-camera-phones-simply-arent-suited-for-flesh-tones.html#comment-11904</guid>
		<description>You shouldn&#039;t &#039;let go&#039; of your Canon, you should use both!

Just for the record, the white balance looks way off on the Canon sample . . . though it is much sharper than the N93i.

I agree with your first comment about subject matter for caparison posts - do cats count? They&#039;re about the only living thing (apart from myself) that I can get to stand still long enough to take two perfectly positioned (and lit) photos of!!!

I might just have to copy your idea. (^_-) Would you mind?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You shouldn&#8217;t &#8216;let go&#8217; of your Canon, you should use both!</p>
<p>Just for the record, the white balance looks way off on the Canon sample . . . though it is much sharper than the N93i.</p>
<p>I agree with your first comment about subject matter for caparison posts &#8211; do cats count? They&#8217;re about the only living thing (apart from myself) that I can get to stand still long enough to take two perfectly positioned (and lit) photos of!!!</p>
<p>I might just have to copy your idea. (^_-) Would you mind?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bondi</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2007/02/17/nokia-camera-phones-simply-arent-suited-for-flesh-tones.html/comment-page-1/#comment-11903</link>
		<dc:creator>bondi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 00:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/2007/02/17/nokia-camera-phones-simply-arent-suited-for-flesh-tones.html#comment-11903</guid>
		<description>Good comparison there...

I liked the old vulcan-style pic of you under &#039;Contact Me&#039;!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good comparison there&#8230;</p>
<p>I liked the old vulcan-style pic of you under &#8216;Contact Me&#8217;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
