<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nokia Communicator: Some thoughts and ideas for the future</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.intomobile.com/2007/02/18/nokia-communicator-some-thoughts-and-ideas-for-the-future.html/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2007/02/18/nokia-communicator-some-thoughts-and-ideas-for-the-future.html</link>
	<description>Cell Phone News, Information, and Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 22:02:56 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Abbas Reza</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2007/02/18/nokia-communicator-some-thoughts-and-ideas-for-the-future.html/comment-page-1/#comment-11930</link>
		<dc:creator>Abbas Reza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 03:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/2007/02/18/nokia-communicator-some-thoughts-and-ideas-for-the-future.html#comment-11930</guid>
		<description>@stefan: very interesting concept indeed.

consider also, if you will, a communicator that is the size of a 9500, except the internal is maximized to the vertical edges (for perfect 16:9 ratio), and the keyboard folds up and out of the communicator&#039;s body to the size of the one of those bluetooth external keyboards (like Stowaway etc).

And lose S60, and bring back S80. S60 has so much development going for it right now, I know - but I really dont know about S60 in a communicator, which i think needs a File/Edit/View style drop down menu system. I had a E61 and 9300i previously (currently on P990) and feel the S80 menus are so much faster to navigate through. I guess I&#039;ll have to see the S60 system on a communicator live before making absolute dismissals though.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@stefan: very interesting concept indeed.</p>
<p>consider also, if you will, a communicator that is the size of a 9500, except the internal is maximized to the vertical edges (for perfect 16:9 ratio), and the keyboard folds up and out of the communicator&#8217;s body to the size of the one of those bluetooth external keyboards (like Stowaway etc).</p>
<p>And lose S60, and bring back S80. S60 has so much development going for it right now, I know &#8211; but I really dont know about S60 in a communicator, which i think needs a File/Edit/View style drop down menu system. I had a E61 and 9300i previously (currently on P990) and feel the S80 menus are so much faster to navigate through. I guess I&#8217;ll have to see the S60 system on a communicator live before making absolute dismissals though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stefan Constantinescu</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2007/02/18/nokia-communicator-some-thoughts-and-ideas-for-the-future.html/comment-page-1/#comment-11929</link>
		<dc:creator>Stefan Constantinescu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 02:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/2007/02/18/nokia-communicator-some-thoughts-and-ideas-for-the-future.html#comment-11929</guid>
		<description>The Fixer: that defeats the entire purpose. they are 2 devices, but they are apart of each other.

Derek: Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Fixer: that defeats the entire purpose. they are 2 devices, but they are apart of each other.</p>
<p>Derek: Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Fixer</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2007/02/18/nokia-communicator-some-thoughts-and-ideas-for-the-future.html/comment-page-1/#comment-11928</link>
		<dc:creator>The Fixer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 01:50:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/2007/02/18/nokia-communicator-some-thoughts-and-ideas-for-the-future.html#comment-11928</guid>
		<description>I like the idea, the only problem is that you then have 2 devices again... I agree the E90 needs to be larger, but I think they should keep the keypad/secondary display on the outside, I don&#039;t plan to hold it up to my head unless my bluetooth headset is dead (I don&#039;t with my E61).  I think they should make it same width as an E61 just make it longer like a communicator (With the clamshell of course), should have a nice sized keyboard then.  Just my 2 cents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the idea, the only problem is that you then have 2 devices again&#8230; I agree the E90 needs to be larger, but I think they should keep the keypad/secondary display on the outside, I don&#8217;t plan to hold it up to my head unless my bluetooth headset is dead (I don&#8217;t with my E61).  I think they should make it same width as an E61 just make it longer like a communicator (With the clamshell of course), should have a nice sized keyboard then.  Just my 2 cents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek Coleman</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2007/02/18/nokia-communicator-some-thoughts-and-ideas-for-the-future.html/comment-page-1/#comment-11927</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek Coleman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 01:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/2007/02/18/nokia-communicator-some-thoughts-and-ideas-for-the-future.html#comment-11927</guid>
		<description>I like how your mind works Mr. Constantinescu. Your idea makes perfect sense. I would also like to see something like this come to market. Very practical, not too complicated at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like how your mind works Mr. Constantinescu. Your idea makes perfect sense. I would also like to see something like this come to market. Very practical, not too complicated at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
