Comments on: Nokia N93i vs 6630: The progress we have accomplished with camera phones http://www.intomobile.com/2007/02/19/nokia-n93i-vs-6630-the-progress-we-have-accomplished-with-camera-phones.html Cell Phone News, Information, and Analysis Thu, 26 Nov 2009 11:05:07 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=abc hourly 1 By: Stefan Constantinescu http://www.intomobile.com/2007/02/19/nokia-n93i-vs-6630-the-progress-we-have-accomplished-with-camera-phones.html/comment-page-1/#comment-11951 Stefan Constantinescu Mon, 19 Feb 2007 19:00:29 +0000 http://www.intomobile.com/2007/02/19/nokia-n93i-vs-6630-the-progress-we-have-accomplished-with-camera-phones.html#comment-11951 I just wish Nokia and Canon engineers would get together in a room and pop out something absolutely amazing. Silly dreams. I just wish Nokia and Canon engineers would get together in a room and pop out something absolutely amazing.

Silly dreams.

]]> By: James @ The Creative Life http://www.intomobile.com/2007/02/19/nokia-n93i-vs-6630-the-progress-we-have-accomplished-with-camera-phones.html/comment-page-1/#comment-11950 James @ The Creative Life Mon, 19 Feb 2007 18:56:33 +0000 http://www.intomobile.com/2007/02/19/nokia-n93i-vs-6630-the-progress-we-have-accomplished-with-camera-phones.html#comment-11950 Please excuse my spelling . . . that was 'render', not 'rendar'! And 'we say', not 'will say'!! What an idiot I am sometimes! Please excuse my spelling . . . that was ‘render’, not ‘rendar’! And ‘we say’, not ‘will say’!! What an idiot I am sometimes!

]]> By: James @ The Creative Life http://www.intomobile.com/2007/02/19/nokia-n93i-vs-6630-the-progress-we-have-accomplished-with-camera-phones.html/comment-page-1/#comment-11949 James @ The Creative Life Mon, 19 Feb 2007 18:53:33 +0000 http://www.intomobile.com/2007/02/19/nokia-n93i-vs-6630-the-progress-we-have-accomplished-with-camera-phones.html#comment-11949 It seems pretty obvious that camera phones will always be one step behind dedicated cameras. But that's like saying that personal computers will always be one step behind Pixar's rendar farm! It's horses for courses, as will say here in the UK. It seems pretty obvious that camera phones will always be one step behind dedicated cameras. But that’s like saying that personal computers will always be one step behind Pixar’s rendar farm! It’s horses for courses, as will say here in the UK.

]]> By: pavle http://www.intomobile.com/2007/02/19/nokia-n93i-vs-6630-the-progress-we-have-accomplished-with-camera-phones.html/comment-page-1/#comment-11948 pavle Mon, 19 Feb 2007 18:39:59 +0000 http://www.intomobile.com/2007/02/19/nokia-n93i-vs-6630-the-progress-we-have-accomplished-with-camera-phones.html#comment-11948 personally i'll never use 16 mm thick dig. camera or phone and i would sacrifice having the slim phone :) but i still don't think that is possible to put optics as good as they are in dig. cams. in phone. When it comes to optics, it's all about how big is something. hm.. maybe (for beginning) use of CCD sensors instead of CMOS. :) personally i’ll never use 16 mm thick dig. camera or phone and i would sacrifice having the slim phone :)

but i still don’t think that is possible to put optics as good as they are in dig. cams. in phone. When it comes to optics, it’s all about how big is something.

hm.. maybe (for beginning) use of CCD sensors instead of CMOS. :)

]]> By: viipottaja http://www.intomobile.com/2007/02/19/nokia-n93i-vs-6630-the-progress-we-have-accomplished-with-camera-phones.html/comment-page-1/#comment-11947 viipottaja Mon, 19 Feb 2007 17:45:07 +0000 http://www.intomobile.com/2007/02/19/nokia-n93i-vs-6630-the-progress-we-have-accomplished-with-camera-phones.html#comment-11947 The problem is of course that, IMO, a cam only digi cam is a VERY simple machine if one compares it with a amazingly complex, multitasking 3G phone.. yet camera makers require about the same space/size to make a decent one. The problem is of course that, IMO, a cam only digi cam is a VERY simple machine if one compares it with a amazingly complex, multitasking 3G phone.. yet camera makers require about the same space/size to make a decent one.

]]>