Anyone read Timothy Wu’s paper on the American wireless industry?

Engadget Mobile:

Do you believe that mobile carriers are to controlling in the actual design (hardware and software) of cellular handsets these days? If so, you’ll probably love an opinion paper by Columbia law professor Timothy Wu. Wu suggests that cellphone design and innovation is being inhibited by cellular service providers. We all know why this happens, of course — the carriers love the walled garden policy of controlling how and why subscribers use their handsets. Usually, the design of a carrier-branded handset is geared to goose subscribers into more services and more add-ons. But, the GSM world knows all to well that "free and open" handsets don’t have these annoyances at all, much to the chagrin of the carriers (like AT&T (NYSE: T) and T-Mobile (NYSE: DT) USA). Are the policies of carriers hurting consumers? Wu makes his case by bringing up features that are blocked by many carriers which come native with many handsets before being disabled by carriers. Features like WiFi, Bluetooth, GPS, advanced SMS, browsers and photo and sound file transfer capabilities. The biggie that caught our eyes? Real-time call timers. You go, Mr. Wu — stick it to the man.

Direct link to Wu’s paper (scroll down and select a mirror)

I’m adding this to my printer queue. Should have a hard copy tomorrow once I connect to the my schools Intranet.

I’ve merely skimmed it and I think this is something perfect for all the people asking: Why isn’t Nokia (NYSE: NOK) popular in the USA? It explains how operators go out of there way to castrate products just to increase their bottom line. Page 12 talks about the E62 and why the only reason it was created was to make sure AT&T customers didn’t use VoIP.

Let Motorola (NYSE: MOT) be a superstar eunuch in the states. Nokia’s got a pair apparently.

(image from Tim Wu’s site)