<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SDHC Support: Please?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.intomobile.com/2007/02/27/sdhc-support-please.html/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2007/02/27/sdhc-support-please.html</link>
	<description>Cell Phone News, Information, and Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 22:02:56 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Stefan Constantinescu</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2007/02/27/sdhc-support-please.html/comment-page-1/#comment-12167</link>
		<dc:creator>Stefan Constantinescu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 11:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/2007/02/27/sdhc-support-please.html#comment-12167</guid>
		<description>I have no problems giving up the option of an anorexic phone. Just look at the Canon ELPH line of cameras.

The N91 isn&#039;t exactly what one woyld call tiny either.

Bring on the SDHC!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no problems giving up the option of an anorexic phone. Just look at the Canon ELPH line of cameras.</p>
<p>The N91 isn&#8217;t exactly what one woyld call tiny either.</p>
<p>Bring on the SDHC!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PlayerKill</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2007/02/27/sdhc-support-please.html/comment-page-1/#comment-12166</link>
		<dc:creator>PlayerKill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 09:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/2007/02/27/sdhc-support-please.html#comment-12166</guid>
		<description>Ya, I really want this too. 2GB is insufficient now... 4GB Micro SD is totally wicked. &gt;_&lt;

Although, I find it lame that the SD group has to come up with a HC version for more capacities. MemorySticks are still just Pro in 4 and 8GB variations. -_-&quot; Sigh... I wish MemoryStick was the adopted format instead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ya, I really want this too. 2GB is insufficient now&#8230; 4GB Micro SD is totally wicked. >_<</p>
<p>Although, I find it lame that the SD group has to come up with a HC version for more capacities. MemorySticks are still just Pro in 4 and 8GB variations. -_-&#8221; Sigh&#8230; I wish MemoryStick was the adopted format instead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tommi Vilkamo</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2007/02/27/sdhc-support-please.html/comment-page-1/#comment-12165</link>
		<dc:creator>Tommi Vilkamo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 07:11:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/2007/02/27/sdhc-support-please.html#comment-12165</guid>
		<description>Memory card holders are quite big components; therefore
the industry is in a transition towards smaller ones.

So which will it be: thin or big memory card slots? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Memory card holders are quite big components; therefore<br />
the industry is in a transition towards smaller ones.</p>
<p>So which will it be: thin or big memory card slots? <img src='http://static.intomobile.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
