<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rafe reviews the Nokia E65</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.intomobile.com/2007/03/02/rafe-reviews-the-nokia-e65.html/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2007/03/02/rafe-reviews-the-nokia-e65.html</link>
	<description>Cell Phone News, Information, and Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 22:02:56 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Rafe</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2007/03/02/rafe-reviews-the-nokia-e65.html/comment-page-1/#comment-12201</link>
		<dc:creator>Rafe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 10:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/2007/03/02/rafe-reviews-the-nokia-e65.html#comment-12201</guid>
		<description>The phone is obviously not perfect, but given the target market there&#039;s little negative to say about it. You, of course, have to be aware of what you&#039;re buying. As mentioned the camera / multimedia isn&#039;t too good. However in its segment, like a lot of mid tier phones, there precious little to be really critical of. It goes without saying if you judge it from a power user stand point there are problems (buttons, screen size, no front facing camera etc etc). 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The phone is obviously not perfect, but given the target market there&#8217;s little negative to say about it. You, of course, have to be aware of what you&#8217;re buying. As mentioned the camera / multimedia isn&#8217;t too good. However in its segment, like a lot of mid tier phones, there precious little to be really critical of. It goes without saying if you judge it from a power user stand point there are problems (buttons, screen size, no front facing camera etc etc).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JonnyBruha</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2007/03/02/rafe-reviews-the-nokia-e65.html/comment-page-1/#comment-12200</link>
		<dc:creator>JonnyBruha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 08:41:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/2007/03/02/rafe-reviews-the-nokia-e65.html#comment-12200</guid>
		<description>Group call, Contacts, Mute, and configurable buttons? I think I&#039;d use half of them. I would love to pick this phone up as my next, but that would be another thing to add to the list of things I wouldn&#039;t use, with the WCDMA, built-in IM client, push email features and so on and so forth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Group call, Contacts, Mute, and configurable buttons? I think I&#8217;d use half of them. I would love to pick this phone up as my next, but that would be another thing to add to the list of things I wouldn&#8217;t use, with the WCDMA, built-in IM client, push email features and so on and so forth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
