Comments on: Why isn’t S60 as snappy as S40? http://www.intomobile.com/2007/03/12/why-isnt-s60-as-snappy-as-s40.html Cell Phone News, Information, and Analysis Wed, 25 Nov 2009 06:05:26 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=abc hourly 1 By: Tommi Vilkamo http://www.intomobile.com/2007/03/12/why-isnt-s60-as-snappy-as-s40.html/comment-page-1/#comment-12409 Tommi Vilkamo Thu, 15 Mar 2007 09:38:51 +0000 http://www.intomobile.com/2007/03/12/why-isnt-s60-as-snappy-as-s40.html#comment-12409 Read one of Clayton Christensen's books to get a proper answer. This is a common dilemma in tech development: integrated technology solutions (such as S40) provide better performance, but open horizontal technology platforms (such as S60) provide better flexibility etc. As the technology advances, the benefits in flexibility etc. will eventually outweigh the benefits in extra performance. When that happens exactly, depends on the preferences of the user. You are free to choose which approach you prefer most :) Read one of Clayton Christensen’s books to get a proper answer. This is a common dilemma in tech development: integrated technology solutions (such as S40) provide better performance, but open horizontal technology platforms (such as S60) provide better flexibility etc. As the technology advances, the benefits in flexibility etc. will eventually outweigh the benefits in extra performance. When that happens exactly, depends on the preferences of the user.

You are free to choose which approach you prefer most :)

]]>