<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple iPhone Antennae / Reception Performance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.intomobile.com/2007/03/14/apple-iphone-antennae-reception-performance.html/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2007/03/14/apple-iphone-antennae-reception-performance.html</link>
	<description>Cell Phone News, Information, and Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 22:02:56 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Vasya</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2007/03/14/apple-iphone-antennae-reception-performance.html/comment-page-1/#comment-82352</link>
		<dc:creator>Vasya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 00:56:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/2007/03/14/apple-iphone-antennae-reception-performance.html#comment-82352</guid>
		<description>Total nonsense! iPhone has a dual band PIFA (planar inverted F antenna) for 800/1900 bands as a main communication antenna and additional small monopole or F for Bluetooth and/or WiFi. Antenna placement is very similar to Motorola Razor or LG Chocolate. As far as performance is concerned, it has been shown that internal PIFA does not have performance degradation compared to a stub (helical) antenna.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Total nonsense! iPhone has a dual band PIFA (planar inverted F antenna) for 800/1900 bands as a main communication antenna and additional small monopole or F for Bluetooth and/or WiFi. Antenna placement is very similar to Motorola Razor or LG Chocolate. As far as performance is concerned, it has been shown that internal PIFA does not have performance degradation compared to a stub (helical) antenna.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: timmm</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2007/03/14/apple-iphone-antennae-reception-performance.html/comment-page-1/#comment-700</link>
		<dc:creator>timmm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 02:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/2007/03/14/apple-iphone-antennae-reception-performance.html#comment-700</guid>
		<description>still no 3G tho!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>still no 3G tho!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
