<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yet another write once run everywhere platform is released</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.intomobile.com/2007/04/16/yet-another-write-once-run-everywhere-platform-is-released.html/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2007/04/16/yet-another-write-once-run-everywhere-platform-is-released.html</link>
	<description>Cell Phone News, Information, and Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:59:26 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Bazza</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2007/04/16/yet-another-write-once-run-everywhere-platform-is-released.html/comment-page-1/#comment-13034</link>
		<dc:creator>Bazza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 11:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/2007/04/16/yet-another-write-once-run-everywhere-platform-is-released.html#comment-13034</guid>
		<description>Yet every where on the interweb folks keep drumming the &quot;MS aren&#039;t innovative&quot; chant. Oh well.

As for this whole web application idea, I&#039;m not so entirely on board. all that private data flying exclusively through some hacker&#039;s box unsettles me.  Its like the dependence on digital controls, its better to have a redundancy of analog/physical backup controls.

Dont get me wrong, i like the idea, but we shouldn&#039;t rush blindly without a truly secure back end.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yet every where on the interweb folks keep drumming the &#8220;MS aren&#8217;t innovative&#8221; chant. Oh well.</p>
<p>As for this whole web application idea, I&#8217;m not so entirely on board. all that private data flying exclusively through some hacker&#8217;s box unsettles me.  Its like the dependence on digital controls, its better to have a redundancy of analog/physical backup controls.</p>
<p>Dont get me wrong, i like the idea, but we shouldn&#8217;t rush blindly without a truly secure back end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
