<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: dotMobi launches dev.mobi to help developers optimize content for mobile phones</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.intomobile.com/2007/07/26/dotmobi-launches-devmobi-to-help-developers-optimize-content-for-mobile-phones.html/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2007/07/26/dotmobi-launches-devmobi-to-help-developers-optimize-content-for-mobile-phones.html</link>
	<description>Cell Phone News, Information, and Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:37:53 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Vance Hedderel, Director of PR, dotMobi</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2007/07/26/dotmobi-launches-devmobi-to-help-developers-optimize-content-for-mobile-phones.html/comment-page-1/#comment-24674</link>
		<dc:creator>Vance Hedderel, Director of PR, dotMobi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 13:51:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/2007/07/26/dotmobi-launches-devmobi-to-help-developers-optimize-content-for-mobile-phones.html#comment-24674</guid>
		<description>Dusan ... While I admit I&#039;m partial to .mobi for obvious reasons, I&#039;d suggest that you should care about a consistent way for end users to find good mobile content.

We&#039;re still in a world where Disney&#039;s mobile URL is mobile.disney.go.com while Bravo TV uses wap.bravotv.com and Best Buy uses bestbuy.com/m. Verizon&#039;s is verizonwireless.com/mobile. 

The .mobi domain is designed to bring clarity to this confusion. And with with backers from ranging from Ericsson and Nokia to T-Mobile and Vodafone to Visa, Google and Microsoft, it&#039;s got a group of people behind it who are sure that it&#039;s **the** way forward.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dusan &#8230; While I admit I&#8217;m partial to .mobi for obvious reasons, I&#8217;d suggest that you should care about a consistent way for end users to find good mobile content.</p>
<p>We&#8217;re still in a world where Disney&#8217;s mobile URL is mobile.disney.go.com while Bravo TV uses wap.bravotv.com and Best Buy uses bestbuy.com/m. Verizon&#8217;s is verizonwireless.com/mobile. </p>
<p>The .mobi domain is designed to bring clarity to this confusion. And with with backers from ranging from Ericsson and Nokia to T-Mobile and Vodafone to Visa, Google and Microsoft, it&#8217;s got a group of people behind it who are sure that it&#8217;s **the** way forward.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
