<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Samsung F700 Croix is pretty slick, slightly disappointing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.intomobile.com/2007/10/23/samsung-f700-croix-is-pretty-slick-slightly-disappointing.html/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2007/10/23/samsung-f700-croix-is-pretty-slick-slightly-disappointing.html</link>
	<description>Cell Phone News, Information, and Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 23:48:22 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2007/10/23/samsung-f700-croix-is-pretty-slick-slightly-disappointing.html/comment-page-1/#comment-69118</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 00:22:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/2007/10/23/samsung-f700-croix-is-pretty-slick-slightly-disappointing.html#comment-69118</guid>
		<description>Thanks for posting this Will... it&#039;s great to finally see some live footage of the f700.

Did you get a chance to browse the web with it? This is a major part of what I need from a phone plus a decent size &amp; res screen for it. (iphone has an awesome screen but no 3G and bluetooth data transfer is crippled on it).

Also, I know this is a broken-record question but any news on the release date for the UK market?

Thanks again for the great post. :)

Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for posting this Will&#8230; it&#8217;s great to finally see some live footage of the f700.</p>
<p>Did you get a chance to browse the web with it? This is a major part of what I need from a phone plus a decent size &amp; res screen for it. (iphone has an awesome screen but no 3G and bluetooth data transfer is crippled on it).</p>
<p>Also, I know this is a broken-record question but any news on the release date for the UK market?</p>
<p>Thanks again for the great post. <img src='http://static.intomobile.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Park</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2007/10/23/samsung-f700-croix-is-pretty-slick-slightly-disappointing.html/comment-page-1/#comment-67956</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Park</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 18:32:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/2007/10/23/samsung-f700-croix-is-pretty-slick-slightly-disappointing.html#comment-67956</guid>
		<description>The Croix is good eye-candy, but the UI allows for fairly intuitive controls (like music playback). 

It&#039;s definitely disappointing that Samsung decided to go with the &quot;pseudo-haptic&quot; feedback rather than screen-based feedback (maybe to keep the Croix thickness to a minimum?). The haptic issue is a slight disappointment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Croix is good eye-candy, but the UI allows for fairly intuitive controls (like music playback). </p>
<p>It&#8217;s definitely disappointing that Samsung decided to go with the &#8220;pseudo-haptic&#8221; feedback rather than screen-based feedback (maybe to keep the Croix thickness to a minimum?). The haptic issue is a slight disappointment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2007/10/23/samsung-f700-croix-is-pretty-slick-slightly-disappointing.html/comment-page-1/#comment-67794</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 12:14:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/2007/10/23/samsung-f700-croix-is-pretty-slick-slightly-disappointing.html#comment-67794</guid>
		<description>So whats the &quot;slightly disappointing&quot; part? You say the UI is great and the body is great.  i doubt the unconvincing haptic feedback alone warrants a title that harsh when everything else works fine on first impressions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So whats the &#8220;slightly disappointing&#8221; part? You say the UI is great and the body is great.  i doubt the unconvincing haptic feedback alone warrants a title that harsh when everything else works fine on first impressions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Viipottaja</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2007/10/23/samsung-f700-croix-is-pretty-slick-slightly-disappointing.html/comment-page-1/#comment-67617</link>
		<dc:creator>Viipottaja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 05:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/2007/10/23/samsung-f700-croix-is-pretty-slick-slightly-disappointing.html#comment-67617</guid>
		<description>Hmm.. frankly, the video is not convincing at all, and looks like more eye candy yet again, without much intuitivity improvement. But I may be completely wrong, hard to say based on just that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm.. frankly, the video is not convincing at all, and looks like more eye candy yet again, without much intuitivity improvement. But I may be completely wrong, hard to say based on just that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
