<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ZXing, Google&#8217;s open source QR code reader</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.intomobile.com/2007/11/13/zxing-googles-open-source-qr-code-reader.html/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2007/11/13/zxing-googles-open-source-qr-code-reader.html</link>
	<description>Cell Phone News, Information, and Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:49:53 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Chloe</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2007/11/13/zxing-googles-open-source-qr-code-reader.html/comment-page-1/#comment-322417</link>
		<dc:creator>Chloe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 08:12:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/2007/11/13/zxing-googles-open-source-qr-code-reader.html#comment-322417</guid>
		<description>Hi, 
I am a third year IT student. Now, i am doing a project on QR Code in Java form...
Anyone can tell me where can i get the source code for QR Code of encode and decode and image?
By the way, may i know is there any way that web camera can capture image of QR code?
Is there any open source on that?
Thankz..

^.^</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
I am a third year IT student. Now, i am doing a project on QR Code in Java form&#8230;<br />
Anyone can tell me where can i get the source code for QR Code of encode and decode and image?<br />
By the way, may i know is there any way that web camera can capture image of QR code?<br />
Is there any open source on that?<br />
Thankz..</p>
<p>^.^</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GAM weeerarathna</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2007/11/13/zxing-googles-open-source-qr-code-reader.html/comment-page-1/#comment-296800</link>
		<dc:creator>GAM weeerarathna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 04:04:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/2007/11/13/zxing-googles-open-source-qr-code-reader.html#comment-296800</guid>
		<description>I want Softaware for open sourse (java)barcode generater.help</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want Softaware for open sourse (java)barcode generater.help</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GAM weeerarathna</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2007/11/13/zxing-googles-open-source-qr-code-reader.html/comment-page-1/#comment-296794</link>
		<dc:creator>GAM weeerarathna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 03:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/2007/11/13/zxing-googles-open-source-qr-code-reader.html#comment-296794</guid>
		<description>I want software for ope source (java)barcode generater.help me</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want software for ope source (java)barcode generater.help me</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Swampthing</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2007/11/13/zxing-googles-open-source-qr-code-reader.html/comment-page-1/#comment-97430</link>
		<dc:creator>Swampthing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 15:11:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/2007/11/13/zxing-googles-open-source-qr-code-reader.html#comment-97430</guid>
		<description>This is a repeat. Google has tunnel vision.  They need people that think outside box.

If Google thought this out, why wouldn’t they want to control revenue from both a direct and indirect system?
Why not offer the brands, their customers, the option of both worlds? Why? Brands could change their offering without changing the code on their product.
Why not offer a mobile reader that lets the consumer click on multiple types of codes and other things.
IMO, the NeoReader offers the end to end solution for consumers.
Google needs to take another look at mobile interaction. Why? There are more than just codes to click on. What happens when I walk down the street and there are no codes to click on? What if I say the restaurant name into the browser? What about RFID? What about keywords, logos, trademarks?
If Google wants to offer the best, end to end for the consumer, they need to offer direct and indirect solutions for their customers and the ability to click on multiple types of symbologies, and keywords, logos, trademarks, RFID, from the mobile device.
IMO, they are a smart group, they need to think about what they want to offer their customers and what they can do for the end user. Anything less would be worthless to the consumer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a repeat. Google has tunnel vision.  They need people that think outside box.</p>
<p>If Google thought this out, why wouldn’t they want to control revenue from both a direct and indirect system?<br />
Why not offer the brands, their customers, the option of both worlds? Why? Brands could change their offering without changing the code on their product.<br />
Why not offer a mobile reader that lets the consumer click on multiple types of codes and other things.<br />
IMO, the NeoReader offers the end to end solution for consumers.<br />
Google needs to take another look at mobile interaction. Why? There are more than just codes to click on. What happens when I walk down the street and there are no codes to click on? What if I say the restaurant name into the browser? What about RFID? What about keywords, logos, trademarks?<br />
If Google wants to offer the best, end to end for the consumer, they need to offer direct and indirect solutions for their customers and the ability to click on multiple types of symbologies, and keywords, logos, trademarks, RFID, from the mobile device.<br />
IMO, they are a smart group, they need to think about what they want to offer their customers and what they can do for the end user. Anything less would be worthless to the consumer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marklar</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2007/11/13/zxing-googles-open-source-qr-code-reader.html/comment-page-1/#comment-86216</link>
		<dc:creator>marklar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 22:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/2007/11/13/zxing-googles-open-source-qr-code-reader.html#comment-86216</guid>
		<description>Stefan wheres your scoop on the N82?! Got live picture I assume?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stefan wheres your scoop on the N82?! Got live picture I assume?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maciek</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2007/11/13/zxing-googles-open-source-qr-code-reader.html/comment-page-1/#comment-84789</link>
		<dc:creator>Maciek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 23:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/2007/11/13/zxing-googles-open-source-qr-code-reader.html#comment-84789</guid>
		<description>One can only hope so.  We always hear about all those funky things that are supposed to make out lives easier, more fun, more interactive but then we hear &quot;It&#039;s a success in Asia but a failure in Europe and America&quot;.  WHY ???.  I don&#039;t think we&#039;re that much different from Harajuku girls.  True...we don&#039;t make ourselves look like anime or &quot;Hello Kitty&quot; characters but we do strive for the same technology.  I think America and Europe is TOO CORPORATE where in Asia it&#039;s the customer first approach.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One can only hope so.  We always hear about all those funky things that are supposed to make out lives easier, more fun, more interactive but then we hear &#8220;It&#8217;s a success in Asia but a failure in Europe and America&#8221;.  WHY ???.  I don&#8217;t think we&#8217;re that much different from Harajuku girls.  True&#8230;we don&#8217;t make ourselves look like anime or &#8220;Hello Kitty&#8221; characters but we do strive for the same technology.  I think America and Europe is TOO CORPORATE where in Asia it&#8217;s the customer first approach.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
