<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stanford researchers develop super long-lasting Lithium-Ion battery</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.intomobile.com/2008/01/02/stanford-researchers-develop-super-long-lasting-lithium-ion-battery.html/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2008/01/02/stanford-researchers-develop-super-long-lasting-lithium-ion-battery.html</link>
	<description>Cell Phone News, Information, and Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 01:25:40 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Raidium</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2008/01/02/stanford-researchers-develop-super-long-lasting-lithium-ion-battery.html/comment-page-1/#comment-255901</link>
		<dc:creator>Raidium</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 19:11:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/2008/01/02/stanford-researchers-develop-super-long-lasting-lithium-ion-battery.html#comment-255901</guid>
		<description>That is true but I&#039;m sure most of us get home after work and imediately throw our phones on the charger and I&#039;m sure most of us (even though we know we aren&#039;t supposed to) keep our phones on the charger over night.  So this would maake a bad habit into something useful rather then just harmful to our batteries.  

I know I&#039;m one to put my phone on the charger all night even though I tell other people not to do it.  lol.  I forget sometimes...mosttimes...ok, everytime!  :razz:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is true but I&#8217;m sure most of us get home after work and imediately throw our phones on the charger and I&#8217;m sure most of us (even though we know we aren&#8217;t supposed to) keep our phones on the charger over night.  So this would maake a bad habit into something useful rather then just harmful to our batteries.  </p>
<p>I know I&#8217;m one to put my phone on the charger all night even though I tell other people not to do it.  lol.  I forget sometimes&#8230;mosttimes&#8230;ok, everytime!  <img src='http://static.intomobile.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':razz:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart Halliday</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2008/01/02/stanford-researchers-develop-super-long-lasting-lithium-ion-battery.html/comment-page-1/#comment-255698</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Halliday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 12:57:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/2008/01/02/stanford-researchers-develop-super-long-lasting-lithium-ion-battery.html#comment-255698</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t forget it may require ten times longer to charge up as well!

You don&#039;t get something for nothing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t forget it may require ten times longer to charge up as well!</p>
<p>You don&#8217;t get something for nothing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TRUGROUP</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2008/01/02/stanford-researchers-develop-super-long-lasting-lithium-ion-battery.html/comment-page-1/#comment-132874</link>
		<dc:creator>TRUGROUP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 15:20:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/2008/01/02/stanford-researchers-develop-super-long-lasting-lithium-ion-battery.html#comment-132874</guid>
		<description>Lithium Li-ion Battery Technology Innovation -
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

There are technologies available now that could have a major impact on improving both the performance and safety of lithium cells. Indeed, there is technology available now that would at minimum virtually solve the safety problem. Trouble is most of the current investment in batteries is in the Far East - China and Japan - not the United States. So while the United States is a leader in technological innovation for batteries, the commercialization of these technologies is slow because of the battery industry structure. 

Now we have indications early 2008 of a new world oil price / supply crisis providing more evidence that safe batteries of sufficient power and capacity for electric vehicles - HEV and EV - is needed urgently. But existing lithium technology, that is conventional Li-ion cells, is a zero tolerance technology. Without US led innovation hand-in-hand with investment in these batteries we have a significant problem the resolution for which is unclear.

TRU Group Inc - Lithium Consultants
trugroup.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lithium Li-ion Battery Technology Innovation -<br />
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++</p>
<p>There are technologies available now that could have a major impact on improving both the performance and safety of lithium cells. Indeed, there is technology available now that would at minimum virtually solve the safety problem. Trouble is most of the current investment in batteries is in the Far East &#8211; China and Japan &#8211; not the United States. So while the United States is a leader in technological innovation for batteries, the commercialization of these technologies is slow because of the battery industry structure. </p>
<p>Now we have indications early 2008 of a new world oil price / supply crisis providing more evidence that safe batteries of sufficient power and capacity for electric vehicles &#8211; HEV and EV &#8211; is needed urgently. But existing lithium technology, that is conventional Li-ion cells, is a zero tolerance technology. Without US led innovation hand-in-hand with investment in these batteries we have a significant problem the resolution for which is unclear.</p>
<p>TRU Group Inc &#8211; Lithium Consultants<br />
trugroup.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2008/01/02/stanford-researchers-develop-super-long-lasting-lithium-ion-battery.html/comment-page-1/#comment-131693</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 05:11:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/2008/01/02/stanford-researchers-develop-super-long-lasting-lithium-ion-battery.html#comment-131693</guid>
		<description>This seems to be exactly what the mobile technology market needs right now, not only will it mean you&#039;re not charging it every night but they can put bigger and badder processors on the phones so we have no excuse for phones that clunk from one screen to another and take 30 seconds to load up my message inbox.

And still I expect we won&#039;t see this tech until around 2011 (seriously).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This seems to be exactly what the mobile technology market needs right now, not only will it mean you&#8217;re not charging it every night but they can put bigger and badder processors on the phones so we have no excuse for phones that clunk from one screen to another and take 30 seconds to load up my message inbox.</p>
<p>And still I expect we won&#8217;t see this tech until around 2011 (seriously).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Topy</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2008/01/02/stanford-researchers-develop-super-long-lasting-lithium-ion-battery.html/comment-page-1/#comment-131505</link>
		<dc:creator>Topy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 19:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/2008/01/02/stanford-researchers-develop-super-long-lasting-lithium-ion-battery.html#comment-131505</guid>
		<description>Good to see some progress with batteries too. I&#039;m happy to pay extra, but only with really high end phones...thought that&#039;s probally what they are for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to see some progress with batteries too. I&#8217;m happy to pay extra, but only with really high end phones&#8230;thought that&#8217;s probally what they are for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Park</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2008/01/02/stanford-researchers-develop-super-long-lasting-lithium-ion-battery.html/comment-page-1/#comment-131492</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Park</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 19:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/2008/01/02/stanford-researchers-develop-super-long-lasting-lithium-ion-battery.html#comment-131492</guid>
		<description>LOL@Andrew

As far as the cost of the new tech, it stands to reason that the new batteries will cost a bit more. The new tech will require &quot;one or two different steps&quot; but once manufacturing ramps up and economies of scale come into play, the cost increase should be reasonable. 

I obviously didnt mean that the new battery will cost $2 more - but it WILL cost more. I&#039;d happily pay 30-50% more in battery costs in exchange for a 10 fold increase in capacity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL@Andrew</p>
<p>As far as the cost of the new tech, it stands to reason that the new batteries will cost a bit more. The new tech will require &#8220;one or two different steps&#8221; but once manufacturing ramps up and economies of scale come into play, the cost increase should be reasonable. </p>
<p>I obviously didnt mean that the new battery will cost $2 more &#8211; but it WILL cost more. I&#8217;d happily pay 30-50% more in battery costs in exchange for a 10 fold increase in capacity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: viipottaja.</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2008/01/02/stanford-researchers-develop-super-long-lasting-lithium-ion-battery.html/comment-page-1/#comment-131481</link>
		<dc:creator>viipottaja.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 18:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/2008/01/02/stanford-researchers-develop-super-long-lasting-lithium-ion-battery.html#comment-131481</guid>
		<description>Couple more bucks, according to whom?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Couple more bucks, according to whom?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2008/01/02/stanford-researchers-develop-super-long-lasting-lithium-ion-battery.html/comment-page-1/#comment-131477</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 18:23:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/2008/01/02/stanford-researchers-develop-super-long-lasting-lithium-ion-battery.html#comment-131477</guid>
		<description>Are the explosions going to be ten times bigger as well?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are the explosions going to be ten times bigger as well?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
