<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Huawei U1215: Boring, but NAM 3G enabled</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.intomobile.com/2008/01/04/huawei-u1215-boring-but-nam-3g-enabled.html/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2008/01/04/huawei-u1215-boring-but-nam-3g-enabled.html</link>
	<description>Cell Phone News, Information, and Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 05:35:19 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Ribs</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2008/01/04/huawei-u1215-boring-but-nam-3g-enabled.html/comment-page-1/#comment-325287</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Ribs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 18:52:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/2008/01/04/huawei-u1215-boring-but-nam-3g-enabled.html#comment-325287</guid>
		<description>I can tell you the U1215 does support 850 and 1900 frequencies for WCDMA (3G). In fact, it supports video call and streaming. Besides, it can support the same bands plus 1800 for GSM (2G).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can tell you the U1215 does support 850 and 1900 frequencies for WCDMA (3G). In fact, it supports video call and streaming. Besides, it can support the same bands plus 1800 for GSM (2G).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MicahH</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2008/01/04/huawei-u1215-boring-but-nam-3g-enabled.html/comment-page-1/#comment-132725</link>
		<dc:creator>MicahH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 07:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/2008/01/04/huawei-u1215-boring-but-nam-3g-enabled.html#comment-132725</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think there&#039;s a price yet - for the North American version anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s a price yet &#8211; for the North American version anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ifenga</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2008/01/04/huawei-u1215-boring-but-nam-3g-enabled.html/comment-page-1/#comment-132690</link>
		<dc:creator>ifenga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 05:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/2008/01/04/huawei-u1215-boring-but-nam-3g-enabled.html#comment-132690</guid>
		<description>metallic layout is looks good, just like Nokia 6300, how much for this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>metallic layout is looks good, just like Nokia 6300, how much for this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MicahH</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2008/01/04/huawei-u1215-boring-but-nam-3g-enabled.html/comment-page-1/#comment-132591</link>
		<dc:creator>MicahH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 01:16:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/2008/01/04/huawei-u1215-boring-but-nam-3g-enabled.html#comment-132591</guid>
		<description>I think the best thing going for it is that it&#039;s pretty. Otherwise, I wouldn&#039;t even be interested. Especially with no 3G or EDGE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the best thing going for it is that it&#8217;s pretty. Otherwise, I wouldn&#8217;t even be interested. Especially with no 3G or EDGE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
