<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In early 2008 Kodak will introduce image sensors that suck less</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.intomobile.com/2008/01/05/in-early-2008-kodak-will-introduce-image-sensors-that-suck-less.html/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2008/01/05/in-early-2008-kodak-will-introduce-image-sensors-that-suck-less.html</link>
	<description>Cell Phone News, Information, and Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 23:48:22 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: manish</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2008/01/05/in-early-2008-kodak-will-introduce-image-sensors-that-suck-less.html/comment-page-1/#comment-324869</link>
		<dc:creator>manish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 16:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/2008/01/05/in-early-2008-kodak-will-introduce-image-sensors-that-suck-less.html#comment-324869</guid>
		<description>1/60 sec is likely to produce slight blurring.
ISO 100 is going to make picture less bright

1/180 sec is going to be much sharper.
ISO 300 is going to make the picture brighter. 

So it could be two identical cameras placed next to each others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1/60 sec is likely to produce slight blurring.<br />
ISO 100 is going to make picture less bright</p>
<p>1/180 sec is going to be much sharper.<br />
ISO 300 is going to make the picture brighter. </p>
<p>So it could be two identical cameras placed next to each others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2008/01/05/in-early-2008-kodak-will-introduce-image-sensors-that-suck-less.html/comment-page-1/#comment-159424</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 16:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/2008/01/05/in-early-2008-kodak-will-introduce-image-sensors-that-suck-less.html#comment-159424</guid>
		<description>There are parallax differences between the two shots, which, together with the fact that the two models did not move, means the two images were taken at the same time with two different cameras.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are parallax differences between the two shots, which, together with the fact that the two models did not move, means the two images were taken at the same time with two different cameras.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MicahH</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2008/01/05/in-early-2008-kodak-will-introduce-image-sensors-that-suck-less.html/comment-page-1/#comment-133555</link>
		<dc:creator>MicahH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:41:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/2008/01/05/in-early-2008-kodak-will-introduce-image-sensors-that-suck-less.html#comment-133555</guid>
		<description>Yes, it&#039;s most definitely a fake shot. But, all this shows me is how badly their pictues suck now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, it&#8217;s most definitely a fake shot. But, all this shows me is how badly their pictues suck now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: viipottaja.</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2008/01/05/in-early-2008-kodak-will-introduce-image-sensors-that-suck-less.html/comment-page-1/#comment-133516</link>
		<dc:creator>viipottaja.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/2008/01/05/in-early-2008-kodak-will-introduce-image-sensors-that-suck-less.html#comment-133516</guid>
		<description>Lol.. JaXX, excellent point. Perhaps the girls suck more with the new technology?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lol.. JaXX, excellent point. Perhaps the girls suck more with the new technology?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JaXX</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2008/01/05/in-early-2008-kodak-will-introduce-image-sensors-that-suck-less.html/comment-page-1/#comment-133055</link>
		<dc:creator>JaXX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 23:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/2008/01/05/in-early-2008-kodak-will-introduce-image-sensors-that-suck-less.html#comment-133055</guid>
		<description>Besides the jugling guy, it looks like the girls didn&#039;t move a single angstrom in the previous pics, which then for me smells faked !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Besides the jugling guy, it looks like the girls didn&#8217;t move a single angstrom in the previous pics, which then for me smells faked !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
