<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New TSA regulations for spare batteries on airplanes &#8211; ridiculous</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.intomobile.com/2008/01/06/new-tsa-regulations-for-spare-batteries-on-airplanes-ridiculous.html/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2008/01/06/new-tsa-regulations-for-spare-batteries-on-airplanes-ridiculous.html</link>
	<description>Cell Phone News, Information, and Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 05:35:19 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2008/01/06/new-tsa-regulations-for-spare-batteries-on-airplanes-ridiculous.html/comment-page-1/#comment-323135</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 17:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/2008/01/06/new-tsa-regulations-for-spare-batteries-on-airplanes-ridiculous.html#comment-323135</guid>
		<description>November 4, 2008 my 4 AAA batteries &amp; blunt nose under 1/2&quot; tip   scissors were removed from my carry-on luggage at the Puerto Vallarta airport in Mexico on our return flight to California. Somehow LAX TSA felt these items were safe enough to allow me to have them in my carry-on bags into Mexico - but the Mexican TSA decided to make up their own rules.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>November 4, 2008 my 4 AAA batteries &amp; blunt nose under 1/2&#8243; tip   scissors were removed from my carry-on luggage at the Puerto Vallarta airport in Mexico on our return flight to California. Somehow LAX TSA felt these items were safe enough to allow me to have them in my carry-on bags into Mexico &#8211; but the Mexican TSA decided to make up their own rules.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sid</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2008/01/06/new-tsa-regulations-for-spare-batteries-on-airplanes-ridiculous.html/comment-page-1/#comment-135240</link>
		<dc:creator>sid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 02:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/2008/01/06/new-tsa-regulations-for-spare-batteries-on-airplanes-ridiculous.html#comment-135240</guid>
		<description>and it only applies to SPARE batteries and then those of a professional standard(photographer batteries basically)

anything up to the size of 2x most laptop battery is exempt

and yes its an old DOT ruling, the TSA is catching up with, has nothing to do with exploding chinese batteries
it has to do with exploding batteries on a ups plane parked on the runway</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and it only applies to SPARE batteries and then those of a professional standard(photographer batteries basically)</p>
<p>anything up to the size of 2x most laptop battery is exempt</p>
<p>and yes its an old DOT ruling, the TSA is catching up with, has nothing to do with exploding chinese batteries<br />
it has to do with exploding batteries on a ups plane parked on the runway</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: screener</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2008/01/06/new-tsa-regulations-for-spare-batteries-on-airplanes-ridiculous.html/comment-page-1/#comment-133868</link>
		<dc:creator>screener</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 13:29:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/2008/01/06/new-tsa-regulations-for-spare-batteries-on-airplanes-ridiculous.html#comment-133868</guid>
		<description>Pretty bizarre, but not the first time to find out about changes to the job on the news -- our handlers still haven&#039;t a clue about the changes.  I suspect the FAA released the news item and the &quot;journalists&quot; attributed it to TSA.  Failure to connect the dots on the part of the news media adds to confusion for a travelling public that can&#039;t tell the difference between carry-on and checked baggage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty bizarre, but not the first time to find out about changes to the job on the news &#8212; our handlers still haven&#8217;t a clue about the changes.  I suspect the FAA released the news item and the &#8220;journalists&#8221; attributed it to TSA.  Failure to connect the dots on the part of the news media adds to confusion for a travelling public that can&#8217;t tell the difference between carry-on and checked baggage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Deth</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2008/01/06/new-tsa-regulations-for-spare-batteries-on-airplanes-ridiculous.html/comment-page-1/#comment-133782</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Deth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 09:58:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/2008/01/06/new-tsa-regulations-for-spare-batteries-on-airplanes-ridiculous.html#comment-133782</guid>
		<description>The Dept of Transportation put the battery regulation into effect after a UPS plane went up in flames on the runway.
Not the TSA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Dept of Transportation put the battery regulation into effect after a UPS plane went up in flames on the runway.<br />
Not the TSA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
