Comments on: The Nokia 5710 exists, picture for proof http://www.intomobile.com/2008/01/15/the-nokia-5710-exists-picture-for-proof.html Cell Phone News, Information, and Analysis Wed, 25 Nov 2009 14:06:50 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=abc hourly 1 By: ezuna016 http://www.intomobile.com/2008/01/15/the-nokia-5710-exists-picture-for-proof.html/comment-page-1/#comment-234606 ezuna016 Thu, 29 May 2008 11:04:47 +0000 http://www.intomobile.com/2008/01/15/the-nokia-5710-exists-picture-for-proof.html#comment-234606 haaay!! uto un black nokia 5700 lng yan eh? pwede naman gumamit ng 4gig sa 5700 eh!... meron kc ako haaay!! uto un black nokia 5700 lng yan eh? pwede naman gumamit ng 4gig sa 5700 eh!… meron kc ako

]]> By: shivani http://www.intomobile.com/2008/01/15/the-nokia-5710-exists-picture-for-proof.html/comment-page-1/#comment-171604 shivani Mon, 10 Mar 2008 15:37:22 +0000 http://www.intomobile.com/2008/01/15/the-nokia-5710-exists-picture-for-proof.html#comment-171604 FAKE!!!!!!!! FAKE!!!!!!!!

]]> By: ?????? http://www.intomobile.com/2008/01/15/the-nokia-5710-exists-picture-for-proof.html/comment-page-1/#comment-162314 ?????? Tue, 19 Feb 2008 15:43:05 +0000 http://www.intomobile.com/2008/01/15/the-nokia-5710-exists-picture-for-proof.html#comment-162314 WHEn it will?? i cant WAIT!!! :twisted: and...whan it will be in russia? )) WHEn it will?? i cant WAIT!!! :twisted:
and…whan it will be in russia? ))

]]> By: firdee http://www.intomobile.com/2008/01/15/the-nokia-5710-exists-picture-for-proof.html/comment-page-1/#comment-159305 firdee Thu, 14 Feb 2008 12:39:34 +0000 http://www.intomobile.com/2008/01/15/the-nokia-5710-exists-picture-for-proof.html#comment-159305 i don't think this is for real... i mean 5710 was exists, but not look like this.. this is 5700.... i don’t think this is for real… i mean 5710 was exists, but not look like this.. this is 5700….

]]> By: ayush3090 http://www.intomobile.com/2008/01/15/the-nokia-5710-exists-picture-for-proof.html/comment-page-1/#comment-139874 ayush3090 Thu, 17 Jan 2008 06:25:05 +0000 http://www.intomobile.com/2008/01/15/the-nokia-5710-exists-picture-for-proof.html#comment-139874 5300 and 5610 differ immensely ! 5300 and 5610 differ immensely !

]]> By: PlayerKill http://www.intomobile.com/2008/01/15/the-nokia-5710-exists-picture-for-proof.html/comment-page-1/#comment-139522 PlayerKill Wed, 16 Jan 2008 14:44:49 +0000 http://www.intomobile.com/2008/01/15/the-nokia-5710-exists-picture-for-proof.html#comment-139522 I think it's like how 5300-->5610... I think it’s like how 5300–>5610…

]]> By: ayush3090 http://www.intomobile.com/2008/01/15/the-nokia-5710-exists-picture-for-proof.html/comment-page-1/#comment-139407 ayush3090 Wed, 16 Jan 2008 08:50:50 +0000 http://www.intomobile.com/2008/01/15/the-nokia-5710-exists-picture-for-proof.html#comment-139407 just black ?????? nothing else ? holy shit !!!!!!!! why is it 57(10) then ? just black ??????

nothing else ?

holy shit !!!!!!!!

why is it 57(10) then ?

]]> By: Topy http://www.intomobile.com/2008/01/15/the-nokia-5710-exists-picture-for-proof.html/comment-page-1/#comment-139086 Topy Tue, 15 Jan 2008 15:09:53 +0000 http://www.intomobile.com/2008/01/15/the-nokia-5710-exists-picture-for-proof.html#comment-139086 You call that a new phone then anynomous :lol: You call that a new phone then anynomous :lol:

]]> By: anynomous http://www.intomobile.com/2008/01/15/the-nokia-5710-exists-picture-for-proof.html/comment-page-1/#comment-139081 anynomous Tue, 15 Jan 2008 15:01:03 +0000 http://www.intomobile.com/2008/01/15/the-nokia-5710-exists-picture-for-proof.html#comment-139081 it is funny you denied (several times) in M_R forums its existance. LOL try a bit harder stefan it is funny you denied (several times) in M_R forums its existance.
LOL
try a bit harder stefan

]]> By: Fernando http://www.intomobile.com/2008/01/15/the-nokia-5710-exists-picture-for-proof.html/comment-page-1/#comment-139057 Fernando Tue, 15 Jan 2008 14:17:02 +0000 http://www.intomobile.com/2008/01/15/the-nokia-5710-exists-picture-for-proof.html#comment-139057 Wait, I misread that, not even FP2? wtf +1 Wait, I misread that, not even FP2? wtf +1

]]> By: Fernando http://www.intomobile.com/2008/01/15/the-nokia-5710-exists-picture-for-proof.html/comment-page-1/#comment-139056 Fernando Tue, 15 Jan 2008 14:13:49 +0000 http://www.intomobile.com/2008/01/15/the-nokia-5710-exists-picture-for-proof.html#comment-139056 Just a black 5700 with fp2? wtf Nokia, why all the delays then? Just a black 5700 with fp2? wtf Nokia, why all the delays then?

]]> By: Stefan Constantinescu http://www.intomobile.com/2008/01/15/the-nokia-5710-exists-picture-for-proof.html/comment-page-1/#comment-138983 Stefan Constantinescu Tue, 15 Jan 2008 11:46:55 +0000 http://www.intomobile.com/2008/01/15/the-nokia-5710-exists-picture-for-proof.html#comment-138983 it's a black 5700. period. it’s a black 5700. period.

]]> By: ayush3090 http://www.intomobile.com/2008/01/15/the-nokia-5710-exists-picture-for-proof.html/comment-page-1/#comment-138982 ayush3090 Tue, 15 Jan 2008 11:44:28 +0000 http://www.intomobile.com/2008/01/15/the-nokia-5710-exists-picture-for-proof.html#comment-138982 u actually saw it ?? if u did , im sure u used it too so then wats new in it ? the blue ring around the joystick looks cheap u actually saw it ??
if u did , im sure u used it too

so then wats new in it ?

the blue ring around the joystick looks cheap

]]>