<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lotus Notes eMail coming to iPhone?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.intomobile.com/2008/01/18/lotus-notes-email-coming-to-iphone.html/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2008/01/18/lotus-notes-email-coming-to-iphone.html</link>
	<description>Cell Phone News, Information, and Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 08:11:30 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Park</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2008/01/18/lotus-notes-email-coming-to-iphone.html/comment-page-1/#comment-141314</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Park</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 19:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/2008/01/18/lotus-notes-email-coming-to-iphone.html#comment-141314</guid>
		<description>I would never use Lotus Notes because it&#039;s the epitomy of what&#039;s wrong with the PC way of thinking. Stuff features into a package without regard for usability or &quot;friendliness&quot; - it&#039;s the opposite to Apple&#039;s way of thinking. 

But, the thing that you should take away from this is that even those poor souls unfortunately tethered to Lotus Notes will be able to integrate the iPhone and its fantastic UI and user experience. I just hope IBM and Apple work together to bring a more &quot;Apple-like&quot; experience to the table.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would never use Lotus Notes because it&#8217;s the epitomy of what&#8217;s wrong with the PC way of thinking. Stuff features into a package without regard for usability or &#8220;friendliness&#8221; &#8211; it&#8217;s the opposite to Apple&#8217;s way of thinking. </p>
<p>But, the thing that you should take away from this is that even those poor souls unfortunately tethered to Lotus Notes will be able to integrate the iPhone and its fantastic UI and user experience. I just hope IBM and Apple work together to bring a more &#8220;Apple-like&#8221; experience to the table.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VitaiminCM</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2008/01/18/lotus-notes-email-coming-to-iphone.html/comment-page-1/#comment-141192</link>
		<dc:creator>VitaiminCM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 15:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/2008/01/18/lotus-notes-email-coming-to-iphone.html#comment-141192</guid>
		<description>Poor iPhone users. First they pay $400, then they have to use the worst piece of software ever invented.
Lotus notes is the most un-Apple-like software ever. I have never seen a buggier, counter-intuitive, piece of Craptastic garbage in my life.
This is not a benefit, rather a punishment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Poor iPhone users. First they pay $400, then they have to use the worst piece of software ever invented.<br />
Lotus notes is the most un-Apple-like software ever. I have never seen a buggier, counter-intuitive, piece of Craptastic garbage in my life.<br />
This is not a benefit, rather a punishment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MicahH</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2008/01/18/lotus-notes-email-coming-to-iphone.html/comment-page-1/#comment-140989</link>
		<dc:creator>MicahH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 06:15:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/2008/01/18/lotus-notes-email-coming-to-iphone.html#comment-140989</guid>
		<description>I wouldn&#039;t be surprised if they do the Lotus platform, and hold off on the MS server for Exchange. I think they will only do the MS server if they&#039;ve got overwhelming customer requests for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if they do the Lotus platform, and hold off on the MS server for Exchange. I think they will only do the MS server if they&#8217;ve got overwhelming customer requests for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
