Comments on: Fake Chinese iPhone – C-002 is the REAL iPhone killer http://www.intomobile.com/2008/02/05/fake-chinese-iphone-c-002-is-the-real-iphone-killer.html Cell Phone News, Information, and Analysis Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:16:36 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=abc hourly 1 By: me http://www.intomobile.com/2008/02/05/fake-chinese-iphone-c-002-is-the-real-iphone-killer.html/comment-page-1/#comment-356611 me Fri, 16 Oct 2009 06:19:52 +0000 http://www.intomobile.com/2008/02/05/fake-chinese-iphone-c-002-is-the-real-iphone-killer.html#comment-356611 No software support but still its impresive No software support but still its impresive

]]> By: salwa http://www.intomobile.com/2008/02/05/fake-chinese-iphone-c-002-is-the-real-iphone-killer.html/comment-page-1/#comment-351020 salwa Thu, 13 Aug 2009 13:12:45 +0000 http://www.intomobile.com/2008/02/05/fake-chinese-iphone-c-002-is-the-real-iphone-killer.html#comment-351020 where did u buy your iphone from? i want to buy one 2 where did u buy your iphone from? i want to buy one 2

]]> By: reggy http://www.intomobile.com/2008/02/05/fake-chinese-iphone-c-002-is-the-real-iphone-killer.html/comment-page-1/#comment-340158 reggy Thu, 14 May 2009 12:15:05 +0000 http://www.intomobile.com/2008/02/05/fake-chinese-iphone-c-002-is-the-real-iphone-killer.html#comment-340158 Another iphone exact clone is the Meizu M8 with wifi function Another iphone exact clone is the Meizu M8 with wifi function

]]> By: reggy http://www.intomobile.com/2008/02/05/fake-chinese-iphone-c-002-is-the-real-iphone-killer.html/comment-page-1/#comment-340154 reggy Thu, 14 May 2009 11:52:30 +0000 http://www.intomobile.com/2008/02/05/fake-chinese-iphone-c-002-is-the-real-iphone-killer.html#comment-340154 The EPHONE M8 is the 100% iphone clone with accurate touch screen response with wireless application protocol and gprs support connection,camera,tv function and bluetooth. Better than iphone.The EPHONE M8 cost only around 140$ compared to 700 dollar of unblocked iphone. The EPHONE M8 is the 100% iphone clone with accurate touch screen response
with wireless application protocol and gprs support connection,camera,tv function and bluetooth.
Better than iphone.The EPHONE M8 cost only around 140$ compared to 700 dollar of unblocked iphone.

]]> By: john http://www.intomobile.com/2008/02/05/fake-chinese-iphone-c-002-is-the-real-iphone-killer.html/comment-page-1/#comment-340129 john Thu, 14 May 2009 04:13:36 +0000 http://www.intomobile.com/2008/02/05/fake-chinese-iphone-c-002-is-the-real-iphone-killer.html#comment-340129 I wouldn't be surprised that by the time the clones get to be "100% iPhone" that it would be like $100 less than an unlocked iPhone. There is no iPhone killer. I haven't seen one iClone yet to be as rich as the iPhone. The user interface still dominates big-time in the iPhone. Nothing is as smoothe and reliable. And no Wi-Fi or GPS? That sucks. I bought an i68 (God knows whichever version was brought to me...I can't figure it out) for about $100 and I think it's crap that it's called a clone. It's a good phone for the money, don't get me wrong...but it's no clone. I wouldn’t be surprised that by the time the clones get to be “100% iPhone” that it would be like $100 less than an unlocked iPhone.

There is no iPhone killer. I haven’t seen one iClone yet to be as rich as the iPhone.

The user interface still dominates big-time in the iPhone. Nothing is as smoothe and reliable. And no Wi-Fi or GPS? That sucks.

I bought an i68 (God knows whichever version was brought to me…I can’t figure it out) for about $100 and I think it’s crap that it’s called a clone. It’s a good phone for the money, don’t get me wrong…but it’s no clone.

]]> By: rohan http://www.intomobile.com/2008/02/05/fake-chinese-iphone-c-002-is-the-real-iphone-killer.html/comment-page-1/#comment-336467 rohan Sat, 11 Apr 2009 04:51:22 +0000 http://www.intomobile.com/2008/02/05/fake-chinese-iphone-c-002-is-the-real-iphone-killer.html#comment-336467 did u just pay 239$ for it?hahahahahah i got mine yesterday for 100$... did u just pay 239$ for it?hahahahahah i got mine yesterday for 100$…

]]> By: Sam http://www.intomobile.com/2008/02/05/fake-chinese-iphone-c-002-is-the-real-iphone-killer.html/comment-page-1/#comment-327724 Sam Sat, 17 Jan 2009 14:36:21 +0000 http://www.intomobile.com/2008/02/05/fake-chinese-iphone-c-002-is-the-real-iphone-killer.html#comment-327724 Well i have this one but i have a little problem, maybe u can help me. On some way i turned on Flight Mode and now i don't know how to turn it off. i am a little piddes off cus i can only lisen music on it now.... Well i have this one but i have a little problem, maybe u can help me.
On some way i turned on Flight Mode and now i don’t know how to turn it off. i am a little piddes off cus i can only lisen music on it now….

]]> By: reptile18 http://www.intomobile.com/2008/02/05/fake-chinese-iphone-c-002-is-the-real-iphone-killer.html/comment-page-1/#comment-160826 reptile18 Sat, 16 Feb 2008 22:34:36 +0000 http://www.intomobile.com/2008/02/05/fake-chinese-iphone-c-002-is-the-real-iphone-killer.html#comment-160826 just discovered that it doesn't support wifi and gps :( just discovered that it doesn’t support wifi and gps :(

]]> By: Kay http://www.intomobile.com/2008/02/05/fake-chinese-iphone-c-002-is-the-real-iphone-killer.html/comment-page-1/#comment-154139 Kay Wed, 06 Feb 2008 04:46:20 +0000 http://www.intomobile.com/2008/02/05/fake-chinese-iphone-c-002-is-the-real-iphone-killer.html#comment-154139 Still, it's impressive. Still, it’s impressive.

]]> By: reptile18 http://www.intomobile.com/2008/02/05/fake-chinese-iphone-c-002-is-the-real-iphone-killer.html/comment-page-1/#comment-154073 reptile18 Wed, 06 Feb 2008 01:14:50 +0000 http://www.intomobile.com/2008/02/05/fake-chinese-iphone-c-002-is-the-real-iphone-killer.html#comment-154073 I love that they kept the apple logo on startup, and the fact that it's not the "iphone", it's the "HIphone!" but it does seem a bit slow at registering inputs, though I love that they kept the apple logo on startup, and the fact that it’s not the “iphone”, it’s the “HIphone!”

but it does seem a bit slow at registering inputs, though

]]>