<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iPhone 3G costs Apple $173 in parts, and how Apple saved $53 over the original iPhone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.intomobile.com/2008/06/24/iphone-3g-costs-apple-173-in-parts-and-how-apple-saved-53-over-the-original-iphone.html/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2008/06/24/iphone-3g-costs-apple-173-in-parts-and-how-apple-saved-53-over-the-original-iphone.html</link>
	<description>Cell Phone News, Information, and Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 23:48:22 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Hlorri</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2008/06/24/iphone-3g-costs-apple-173-in-parts-and-how-apple-saved-53-over-the-original-iphone.html/comment-page-1/#comment-258451</link>
		<dc:creator>Hlorri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 22:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/2008/06/24/iphone-3g-costs-apple-173-in-parts-and-how-apple-saved-53-over-the-original-iphone.html#comment-258451</guid>
		<description>Hmm, that much cash reserves would seem to be a liability, as they are opening themselves up for a &quot;leveraged buyout&quot;.   Basically, for someone to come up with enough shares+money to buy Apple&#039;s shares, they would then have those $15 billion available to pay for the purchase.

That&#039;s why a lot of companies that want to prevent takeovers buy back stock, thus reducing cash reserves (even to the point of incurring debt).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, that much cash reserves would seem to be a liability, as they are opening themselves up for a &#8220;leveraged buyout&#8221;.   Basically, for someone to come up with enough shares+money to buy Apple&#8217;s shares, they would then have those $15 billion available to pay for the purchase.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s why a lot of companies that want to prevent takeovers buy back stock, thus reducing cash reserves (even to the point of incurring debt).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Free Ringtones</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2008/06/24/iphone-3g-costs-apple-173-in-parts-and-how-apple-saved-53-over-the-original-iphone.html/comment-page-1/#comment-258330</link>
		<dc:creator>Free Ringtones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 20:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/2008/06/24/iphone-3g-costs-apple-173-in-parts-and-how-apple-saved-53-over-the-original-iphone.html#comment-258330</guid>
		<description>WOW that is just impressive.  I mean its amazing how much revenue this company generates and still doesn&#039;t payout anything to its shareholders.  15 Billion in cash reserves.. Shouldn&#039;t they start acquiring some companies already?

They sold 6 million handsets last year and with this new price drop it would probably double if not triple.  Now do the math 10 million handsets @ $53 a pop = buy some Aplle shares ... lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW that is just impressive.  I mean its amazing how much revenue this company generates and still doesn&#8217;t payout anything to its shareholders.  15 Billion in cash reserves.. Shouldn&#8217;t they start acquiring some companies already?</p>
<p>They sold 6 million handsets last year and with this new price drop it would probably double if not triple.  Now do the math 10 million handsets @ $53 a pop = buy some Aplle shares &#8230; lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
