<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Motorola MOTOZINE ZN5 reviewed &#8211; Picture quality is top-notch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.intomobile.com/2008/07/08/motorola-motozine-zn5-reviewed-picture-quality-is-top-notch.html/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2008/07/08/motorola-motozine-zn5-reviewed-picture-quality-is-top-notch.html</link>
	<description>Cell Phone News, Information, and Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 05:35:19 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Someone</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2008/07/08/motorola-motozine-zn5-reviewed-picture-quality-is-top-notch.html/comment-page-1/#comment-323355</link>
		<dc:creator>Someone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 03:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/2008/07/08/motorola-motozine-zn5-reviewed-picture-quality-is-top-notch.html#comment-323355</guid>
		<description>The Camera of the Motorola that I brought sucked big time. For 5 MP, it looked even worse than a 1.3 MP camera at first. I exchanged it for another one, and the second one had the same problem too. Grainy images. Maybe I brought 2 phones from a bad batch?? I dont know. But, it has been a very disappointing experience. The phone will be returned back. T-mobile also wants to charge me $10 restocking fee on a defective phone!!! Isnt that a nice trade off??? I get a defective phone, and they get my money to return the damn thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Camera of the Motorola that I brought sucked big time. For 5 MP, it looked even worse than a 1.3 MP camera at first. I exchanged it for another one, and the second one had the same problem too. Grainy images. Maybe I brought 2 phones from a bad batch?? I dont know. But, it has been a very disappointing experience. The phone will be returned back. T-mobile also wants to charge me $10 restocking fee on a defective phone!!! Isnt that a nice trade off??? I get a defective phone, and they get my money to return the damn thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Akceptor</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2008/07/08/motorola-motozine-zn5-reviewed-picture-quality-is-top-notch.html/comment-page-1/#comment-313244</link>
		<dc:creator>Akceptor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 10:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/2008/07/08/motorola-motozine-zn5-reviewed-picture-quality-is-top-notch.html#comment-313244</guid>
		<description>Motorola misses a lot of time again: 5MPix cameras aren&#039;t so popular now (SE uses 7Mpix, for example)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Motorola misses a lot of time again: 5MPix cameras aren&#8217;t so popular now (SE uses 7Mpix, for example)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
