<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will 5MP on the C902 be good enough?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.intomobile.com/2008/08/09/will-5mp-on-the-c902-be-good-enough.html/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2008/08/09/will-5mp-on-the-c902-be-good-enough.html</link>
	<description>Cell Phone News, Information, and Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:24:17 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: sakai giirl</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2008/08/09/will-5mp-on-the-c902-be-good-enough.html/comment-page-1/#comment-332388</link>
		<dc:creator>sakai giirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 04:59:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/2008/08/09/will-5mp-on-the-c902-be-good-enough.html#comment-332388</guid>
		<description>okay ..
i&#039;ve been using c902 ..
the camera wasn&#039;t good.
n the flash..
OMG.
terrible..
the picture come out will look so so so yellow-ish..
seriously..
not good..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>okay ..<br />
i&#8217;ve been using c902 ..<br />
the camera wasn&#8217;t good.<br />
n the flash..<br />
OMG.<br />
terrible..<br />
the picture come out will look so so so yellow-ish..<br />
seriously..<br />
not good..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zak</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2008/08/09/will-5mp-on-the-c902-be-good-enough.html/comment-page-1/#comment-298887</link>
		<dc:creator>Zak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 06:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/2008/08/09/will-5mp-on-the-c902-be-good-enough.html#comment-298887</guid>
		<description>Great post ben!

I also had owned a SE 2 megapixel cameraphone (w810i) which produced suprisingly good pictures for its time. 

I then moved to a nokia n82 (black of course) and was pretty impressed but not blown away. 
In my opinion the n82 took great pics but didn&#039;t do anything spectacular as far as features were concerned.
I should note that the video recording on the n82 was phenomenal!

Unfortunately the n82 not only felt like a cheap piece of plastic, it was a cheap piece of plastic.  After only a couple of weeks of use the exposed xenon had cracked.

I then moved on to another 5 megapixel contender, the samsung g810.
So far id say the colours are slighty more accurate on the n82 however the feature list on the g810 is amazing. Today i finally had the chance to test the camera and i was absolutely blown away with shots i took in macro.
The optical zoom does lose some quality when zoomed in all the way but no where near as bad as digital zoom.

Anyways those were my expiriences with my 5 megapixel phones.  But from what i&#039;ve seen the C902 took horrible videos and mediocre photos.
I would say it&#039;s a poor mans 5 megapixel phone, or a chicks phone seeing as how it doesn&#039;t really do anything else besides take photos and make phonecalls
:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post ben!</p>
<p>I also had owned a SE 2 megapixel cameraphone (w810i) which produced suprisingly good pictures for its time. </p>
<p>I then moved to a nokia n82 (black of course) and was pretty impressed but not blown away.<br />
In my opinion the n82 took great pics but didn&#8217;t do anything spectacular as far as features were concerned.<br />
I should note that the video recording on the n82 was phenomenal!</p>
<p>Unfortunately the n82 not only felt like a cheap piece of plastic, it was a cheap piece of plastic.  After only a couple of weeks of use the exposed xenon had cracked.</p>
<p>I then moved on to another 5 megapixel contender, the samsung g810.<br />
So far id say the colours are slighty more accurate on the n82 however the feature list on the g810 is amazing. Today i finally had the chance to test the camera and i was absolutely blown away with shots i took in macro.<br />
The optical zoom does lose some quality when zoomed in all the way but no where near as bad as digital zoom.</p>
<p>Anyways those were my expiriences with my 5 megapixel phones.  But from what i&#8217;ve seen the C902 took horrible videos and mediocre photos.<br />
I would say it&#8217;s a poor mans 5 megapixel phone, or a chicks phone seeing as how it doesn&#8217;t really do anything else besides take photos and make phonecalls<br />
 <img src='http://static.intomobile.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2008/08/09/will-5mp-on-the-c902-be-good-enough.html/comment-page-1/#comment-298634</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 20:14:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/2008/08/09/will-5mp-on-the-c902-be-good-enough.html#comment-298634</guid>
		<description>Been looking at the SE 902, but wondering if it will surpass the Imobile 902 (image quality wise) that came out long before it...

I had the chance to own the I-Mobile 902 - it has bar none been the best camera phone I have used - 5mp, xenon flash, auto-focus.  And it came out more than 2 years ago.  Pictures when viewed at their actual pixels were comparably as good as a so-so point n&#039; shoot - which is still very good considering this is a phone first, camera second.  Sadly the sensor went wonky after 400 shots, and I returned it (no thanks to paypal, thanks to my credit card) - I then got the LG KG920 - what a piece of garbage that was in comparison - had the 5mp, xenon and autofocus - but dog slow and heavy in comparison.

There was a rumor that the 5mp sensor used in the Imobile was a Sony Cybershot module - but this was never confirmed.  The Imobile 902 felt very similar to an SE though (menu wise)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Been looking at the SE 902, but wondering if it will surpass the Imobile 902 (image quality wise) that came out long before it&#8230;</p>
<p>I had the chance to own the I-Mobile 902 &#8211; it has bar none been the best camera phone I have used &#8211; 5mp, xenon flash, auto-focus.  And it came out more than 2 years ago.  Pictures when viewed at their actual pixels were comparably as good as a so-so point n&#8217; shoot &#8211; which is still very good considering this is a phone first, camera second.  Sadly the sensor went wonky after 400 shots, and I returned it (no thanks to paypal, thanks to my credit card) &#8211; I then got the LG KG920 &#8211; what a piece of garbage that was in comparison &#8211; had the 5mp, xenon and autofocus &#8211; but dog slow and heavy in comparison.</p>
<p>There was a rumor that the 5mp sensor used in the Imobile was a Sony Cybershot module &#8211; but this was never confirmed.  The Imobile 902 felt very similar to an SE though (menu wise)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
