<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Webkit-based Iris browser for Windows Mobile hits final preview stage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.intomobile.com/2008/08/13/webkit-based-iris-browser-for-windows-mobile-hits-final-preview-stage.html/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2008/08/13/webkit-based-iris-browser-for-windows-mobile-hits-final-preview-stage.html</link>
	<description>Cell Phone News, Information, and Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 08:47:50 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: PoisedSimplified</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2008/08/13/webkit-based-iris-browser-for-windows-mobile-hits-final-preview-stage.html/comment-page-1/#comment-301919</link>
		<dc:creator>PoisedSimplified</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 12:45:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/2008/08/13/webkit-based-iris-browser-for-windows-mobile-hits-final-preview-stage.html#comment-301919</guid>
		<description>Aesthetically, it&#039;s &quot;cool&quot; that it might render pages like the iPhone&#039;s Safari browser due to it&#039;s use of WebKit, but the Safari dev team does not handle Iris&#039; development. The app has only one thing going for it - WebKit.  But that is not enough, and after testing Iris, I am wanting all the life back that I lost waiting for pages to load.  A Torch representative wrote back to me saying that Iris uses Internet Explorer for some of Iris&#039; inner-workings .... terrible plan, Torch!  Did you use IE Mobile before deciding it was good idea.  There is virtually nothing that can be done to dramatically improve IE Mobile unless Microsoft wakes up, so why use it as a part of your software when competitors like Opera Mobile, Skyfire, and NetFront have wiped the floor with IE Mobile.  My opinion is don&#039;t waste your time with Iris.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aesthetically, it&#8217;s &#8220;cool&#8221; that it might render pages like the iPhone&#8217;s Safari browser due to it&#8217;s use of WebKit, but the Safari dev team does not handle Iris&#8217; development. The app has only one thing going for it &#8211; WebKit.  But that is not enough, and after testing Iris, I am wanting all the life back that I lost waiting for pages to load.  A Torch representative wrote back to me saying that Iris uses Internet Explorer for some of Iris&#8217; inner-workings &#8230;. terrible plan, Torch!  Did you use IE Mobile before deciding it was good idea.  There is virtually nothing that can be done to dramatically improve IE Mobile unless Microsoft wakes up, so why use it as a part of your software when competitors like Opera Mobile, Skyfire, and NetFront have wiped the floor with IE Mobile.  My opinion is don&#8217;t waste your time with Iris.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
