<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another iPhone Killer? Yeah Right!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.intomobile.com/2008/09/17/samsung-omnia-coming-to-att-as-the-mirage.html/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2008/09/17/samsung-omnia-coming-to-att-as-the-mirage.html</link>
	<description>Cell Phone News, Information, and Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 22:02:56 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Robinson</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2008/09/17/samsung-omnia-coming-to-att-as-the-mirage.html/comment-page-1/#comment-318260</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Robinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 20:48:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/?p=24425#comment-318260</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s daft, that&#039;s for sure. However, I think the reference is to the fact that to be &quot;the best&quot; (in this case that would be selling LOTS of devices), then you have to beat &quot;the best&quot; - which in terms of touchscreen, is the iPhone.

Personally, I just can&#039;t see anyone improving upon the touch sensitivity that the iPhone has - it&#039;s phenomenal. Sure, it has got some awesome faults (low-res camera, no cut and paste, etc), but it&#039;s got the one thing that you can&#039;t buy, no matter how much PR cash you throw - fans who love and adore the device (and Apple products generally) - that kind of end-user loyalty is GOLD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s daft, that&#8217;s for sure. However, I think the reference is to the fact that to be &#8220;the best&#8221; (in this case that would be selling LOTS of devices), then you have to beat &#8220;the best&#8221; &#8211; which in terms of touchscreen, is the iPhone.</p>
<p>Personally, I just can&#8217;t see anyone improving upon the touch sensitivity that the iPhone has &#8211; it&#8217;s phenomenal. Sure, it has got some awesome faults (low-res camera, no cut and paste, etc), but it&#8217;s got the one thing that you can&#8217;t buy, no matter how much PR cash you throw &#8211; fans who love and adore the device (and Apple products generally) &#8211; that kind of end-user loyalty is GOLD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: [TheBORG]</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2008/09/17/samsung-omnia-coming-to-att-as-the-mirage.html/comment-page-1/#comment-318245</link>
		<dc:creator>[TheBORG]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 16:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/?p=24425#comment-318245</guid>
		<description>Bud Light was supposed to be the Miller Light killer, but that didn&#039;t happen because Miller Light tastes great and is less filling than Bud Light.

I can&#039;t stand when people refer to a device as an &quot;iPhone Killer.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bud Light was supposed to be the Miller Light killer, but that didn&#8217;t happen because Miller Light tastes great and is less filling than Bud Light.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t stand when people refer to a device as an &#8220;iPhone Killer.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
