<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RIM stock drops on poor Pearl Flip sales</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.intomobile.com/2008/10/20/rim-stock-drops-on-poor-pearl-flip-sales.html/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2008/10/20/rim-stock-drops-on-poor-pearl-flip-sales.html</link>
	<description>Cell Phone News, Information, and Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 01:25:40 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: GtBoss</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2008/10/20/rim-stock-drops-on-poor-pearl-flip-sales.html/comment-page-1/#comment-320825</link>
		<dc:creator>GtBoss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 21:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/?p=27907#comment-320825</guid>
		<description>I really, really wanted to get the Flip. But now that it&#039;s out, it just doesn&#039;t make $$ and sense. Here&#039;s the math for the 2yr commit here in Seattle....

RIM Pearl 8220 Flip...
Phone cost $150 + Monthly voice plan $40  + Data Plan $25 = $1710.00 total life of contract.

HTC G1...
Phone cost $200 + Monthly voice plan $40 + Data Plan $25 = $17160.00 total life of contract.

So, for another $50, I can browse the web with 3G, enjoy a larger screen, have a useable GPS, have way more application choices, and (add your personal pref here).

The Flip is a great voice phone, email reader, and music player, but not a great web browser. It doesn&#039;t need a $25/mo data plan. They would of sold thousands more at the $50 price point without the data requirement. I gotta spend $700 more to browse the web on that tiny screen? I don&#039;t think so. I got over priced gas to pay for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really, really wanted to get the Flip. But now that it&#8217;s out, it just doesn&#8217;t make $$ and sense. Here&#8217;s the math for the 2yr commit here in Seattle&#8230;.</p>
<p>RIM Pearl 8220 Flip&#8230;<br />
Phone cost $150 + Monthly voice plan $40  + Data Plan $25 = $1710.00 total life of contract.</p>
<p>HTC G1&#8230;<br />
Phone cost $200 + Monthly voice plan $40 + Data Plan $25 = $17160.00 total life of contract.</p>
<p>So, for another $50, I can browse the web with 3G, enjoy a larger screen, have a useable GPS, have way more application choices, and (add your personal pref here).</p>
<p>The Flip is a great voice phone, email reader, and music player, but not a great web browser. It doesn&#8217;t need a $25/mo data plan. They would of sold thousands more at the $50 price point without the data requirement. I gotta spend $700 more to browse the web on that tiny screen? I don&#8217;t think so. I got over priced gas to pay for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conrad Longmore</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2008/10/20/rim-stock-drops-on-poor-pearl-flip-sales.html/comment-page-1/#comment-320709</link>
		<dc:creator>Conrad Longmore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 22:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/?p=27907#comment-320709</guid>
		<description>Why would a candybar or slide be an improvement over a flip? The flip format gives you more room for the keyboard and screen and helps prevent making accidental calls when it&#039;s in your pocket or bag. I&#039;ve always thought that the clamshell / flip design is the most logical one for a phone.. but for some reason it&#039;s just not fashionable in Europe.

I&#039;m definitely after a BlackBerry flip.. but T-Mobile UK don&#039;t have it yet. It&#039;s a much more practical design than the ordinary Pearl!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would a candybar or slide be an improvement over a flip? The flip format gives you more room for the keyboard and screen and helps prevent making accidental calls when it&#8217;s in your pocket or bag. I&#8217;ve always thought that the clamshell / flip design is the most logical one for a phone.. but for some reason it&#8217;s just not fashionable in Europe.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m definitely after a BlackBerry flip.. but T-Mobile UK don&#8217;t have it yet. It&#8217;s a much more practical design than the ordinary Pearl!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2008/10/20/rim-stock-drops-on-poor-pearl-flip-sales.html/comment-page-1/#comment-320705</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 21:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/?p=27907#comment-320705</guid>
		<description>Well I had choice the E71  phone of the year and best smartphone 2008</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I had choice the E71  phone of the year and best smartphone 2008</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AC</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2008/10/20/rim-stock-drops-on-poor-pearl-flip-sales.html/comment-page-1/#comment-320703</link>
		<dc:creator>AC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 21:16:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/?p=27907#comment-320703</guid>
		<description>@JG Mason: &quot;Backwards&quot;? How do you figure...?

The vast majority of mobile handsets in Japan are flips, and I wouldn&#039;t exactly call them backwards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@JG Mason: &#8220;Backwards&#8221;? How do you figure&#8230;?</p>
<p>The vast majority of mobile handsets in Japan are flips, and I wouldn&#8217;t exactly call them backwards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Park</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2008/10/20/rim-stock-drops-on-poor-pearl-flip-sales.html/comment-page-1/#comment-320700</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Park</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 20:23:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/?p=27907#comment-320700</guid>
		<description>I would have thought the 8220 would have at least hit par with expectations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would have thought the 8220 would have at least hit par with expectations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JG Mason</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2008/10/20/rim-stock-drops-on-poor-pearl-flip-sales.html/comment-page-1/#comment-320698</link>
		<dc:creator>JG Mason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 20:08:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/?p=27907#comment-320698</guid>
		<description>I figured I was just out of touch.  I feel a little better knowing my gut was right on this flip BB.  If a user wants pro-grade email, they&#039;ve probably already converted to a candybar or slider phone.  No one wants to go backwards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I figured I was just out of touch.  I feel a little better knowing my gut was right on this flip BB.  If a user wants pro-grade email, they&#8217;ve probably already converted to a candybar or slider phone.  No one wants to go backwards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
