<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sony Ericsson Whips out the Crystal Ball: 20MP Cameras and HD for Mobile Devices by 2012</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.intomobile.com/2008/11/07/sony-ericsson-whips-out-the-crystal-ball-20mp-cameras-and-hd-for-mobile-devices-by-2012.html/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2008/11/07/sony-ericsson-whips-out-the-crystal-ball-20mp-cameras-and-hd-for-mobile-devices-by-2012.html</link>
	<description>Cell Phone News, Information, and Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 08:47:50 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2008/11/07/sony-ericsson-whips-out-the-crystal-ball-20mp-cameras-and-hd-for-mobile-devices-by-2012.html/comment-page-1/#comment-340416</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 17:37:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/?p=29637#comment-340416</guid>
		<description>This makes me wonder if SE really have a vision. Is it really true that the vision of SE is only about specs? No vision about how people will use their devices?

Also, the specs make me wonder if they really have common sense. 
In particular, having a good lense and 5MP provides good enough quality for all your holiday photos. In fact 3MP is probably even enough for most purposes. But then 12MP? Do they expect people to take pictures and enlarge them to poster size?

The screen size may be realistic but also there the question is whether such a high resolution would really provide a better experience on such a small screen then lets say 480 x640.

Surprised they don&#039;t mention battery life in their &#039;vision&#039; of the future of technical specs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This makes me wonder if SE really have a vision. Is it really true that the vision of SE is only about specs? No vision about how people will use their devices?</p>
<p>Also, the specs make me wonder if they really have common sense.<br />
In particular, having a good lense and 5MP provides good enough quality for all your holiday photos. In fact 3MP is probably even enough for most purposes. But then 12MP? Do they expect people to take pictures and enlarge them to poster size?</p>
<p>The screen size may be realistic but also there the question is whether such a high resolution would really provide a better experience on such a small screen then lets say 480 x640.</p>
<p>Surprised they don&#8217;t mention battery life in their &#8216;vision&#8217; of the future of technical specs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zak</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2008/11/07/sony-ericsson-whips-out-the-crystal-ball-20mp-cameras-and-hd-for-mobile-devices-by-2012.html/comment-page-1/#comment-322162</link>
		<dc:creator>Zak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 21:05:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/?p=29637#comment-322162</guid>
		<description>I think this article just made me ejaculate :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this article just made me ejaculate <img src='http://static.intomobile.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Browne</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2008/11/07/sony-ericsson-whips-out-the-crystal-ball-20mp-cameras-and-hd-for-mobile-devices-by-2012.html/comment-page-1/#comment-322151</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Browne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 16:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/?p=29637#comment-322151</guid>
		<description>The first four predictions are quite conservative. They are almost certainly going to happen.

The final one is in a different category. It takes years to build out cellular infrastructure. So although 100Mbit/s technology might be in deployment by 2012, there&#039;s no way that access to it will be widespread. Look at how many places still don&#039;t have access to 3G in 2008.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first four predictions are quite conservative. They are almost certainly going to happen.</p>
<p>The final one is in a different category. It takes years to build out cellular infrastructure. So although 100Mbit/s technology might be in deployment by 2012, there&#8217;s no way that access to it will be widespread. Look at how many places still don&#8217;t have access to 3G in 2008.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
