<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AT&amp;T launches the almost-Omnia Samsung Eternity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.intomobile.com/2008/11/14/att-launches-the-almost-omnia-samsung-eternity.html/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2008/11/14/att-launches-the-almost-omnia-samsung-eternity.html</link>
	<description>Cell Phone News, Information, and Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 14:06:50 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2008/11/14/att-launches-the-almost-omnia-samsung-eternity.html/comment-page-1/#comment-343717</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 19:39:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/?p=30549#comment-343717</guid>
		<description>This phone is a lot of hype anbd overpriced for what you get.  I foolishly was suckered into buying this instead of the iphone when my local wireless dealer wasn&#039;t carrying apple products yet (lame). For $220 bucks I have had to replace this phone already in three months.  It was represented to me as a comperable smart phone to the blackberry  but obviously is not! Contstant lock ups, not having a good operating system to use app&#039;s with, and a lousy representation of its capabilities makes this a loser in my book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This phone is a lot of hype anbd overpriced for what you get.  I foolishly was suckered into buying this instead of the iphone when my local wireless dealer wasn&#8217;t carrying apple products yet (lame). For $220 bucks I have had to replace this phone already in three months.  It was represented to me as a comperable smart phone to the blackberry  but obviously is not! Contstant lock ups, not having a good operating system to use app&#8217;s with, and a lousy representation of its capabilities makes this a loser in my book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: abcyesn</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2008/11/14/att-launches-the-almost-omnia-samsung-eternity.html/comment-page-1/#comment-322992</link>
		<dc:creator>abcyesn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 22:01:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/?p=30549#comment-322992</guid>
		<description>Similar to the Vu, the Samsung model isn&#039;t described as a smartphone and so will compete more against high-end media phones. Samsung will bring its in-house operating system with a TouchWiz layer rather than use Windows Mobile like some of its touch devices. The leak would have the Eternity ship in November for $149 with a two-year plan.  There&#039;s already a fans forum for this at http://www.Samsung-Eternity.com check it out folks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Similar to the Vu, the Samsung model isn&#8217;t described as a smartphone and so will compete more against high-end media phones. Samsung will bring its in-house operating system with a TouchWiz layer rather than use Windows Mobile like some of its touch devices. The leak would have the Eternity ship in November for $149 with a two-year plan.  There&#8217;s already a fans forum for this at <a href="http://www.Samsung-Eternity.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.Samsung-Eternity.com</a> check it out folks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
