<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Touchscreens: who&#8217;s got it right and wrong&#8230;?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.intomobile.com/2008/11/14/touchscreens-whos-got-it-right-and-wrong.html/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2008/11/14/touchscreens-whos-got-it-right-and-wrong.html</link>
	<description>Cell Phone News, Information, and Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:32:28 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: nick</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2008/11/14/touchscreens-whos-got-it-right-and-wrong.html/comment-page-1/#comment-323048</link>
		<dc:creator>nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 15:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/?p=30526#comment-323048</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m always surprised that no mentions the existence of Palm and Palm OS, basically the creators of the PDA. Yes Apple had its Newton (but I don&#039;t remember who was first) but they dropped the Newton since it wasn&#039;t competing with the Palms. So maybe Palm is &#039;old&#039; these days, but they&#039;ve been in the smartphone business long before the iPhone and always with a touch screen that didn&#039;t require a stylus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m always surprised that no mentions the existence of Palm and Palm OS, basically the creators of the PDA. Yes Apple had its Newton (but I don&#8217;t remember who was first) but they dropped the Newton since it wasn&#8217;t competing with the Palms. So maybe Palm is &#8216;old&#8217; these days, but they&#8217;ve been in the smartphone business long before the iPhone and always with a touch screen that didn&#8217;t require a stylus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2008/11/14/touchscreens-whos-got-it-right-and-wrong.html/comment-page-1/#comment-323012</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 02:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/?p=30526#comment-323012</guid>
		<description>Nokia 5800 ftw. So much more features and the features are better than other touchscreen phones</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nokia 5800 ftw. So much more features and the features are better than other touchscreen phones</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 4DThinker</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2008/11/14/touchscreens-whos-got-it-right-and-wrong.html/comment-page-1/#comment-322886</link>
		<dc:creator>4DThinker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 19:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/?p=30526#comment-322886</guid>
		<description>Since the iPhone/Touch came out from Apple I&#039;ve been looking hard for something better and truly expected to see something by now. There are products with better features (Samsung P2 with great Bluetooth capabilities, Samsung Instinct with a longer feature list than the iPhone, etc.) but none so far that makes the touchscreen experience so fluid. What everyone fails to realize is that Apple didn&#039;t come up with the hardware and software of the iPhone overnight. I suspect they&#039;ve been playing with the concept since the Newton. Everyone else seems to be just starting out. Not really innovating.  No deep research behind their efforts. 

I expect 2009 to bring out a few peers (to the iPhone).  2010 may show us some stunning advancement. Hopefully all the beginners will take note of their failures this year and learn from them. 

4D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since the iPhone/Touch came out from Apple I&#8217;ve been looking hard for something better and truly expected to see something by now. There are products with better features (Samsung P2 with great Bluetooth capabilities, Samsung Instinct with a longer feature list than the iPhone, etc.) but none so far that makes the touchscreen experience so fluid. What everyone fails to realize is that Apple didn&#8217;t come up with the hardware and software of the iPhone overnight. I suspect they&#8217;ve been playing with the concept since the Newton. Everyone else seems to be just starting out. Not really innovating.  No deep research behind their efforts. </p>
<p>I expect 2009 to bring out a few peers (to the iPhone).  2010 may show us some stunning advancement. Hopefully all the beginners will take note of their failures this year and learn from them. </p>
<p>4D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2008/11/14/touchscreens-whos-got-it-right-and-wrong.html/comment-page-1/#comment-322688</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 21:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/?p=30526#comment-322688</guid>
		<description>My next touchphone be the Nokia 5800 Xpressmusic &quot;Tube&quot;
for shoore , yes the touch are nice in iphone but sad it lack all other things you need , like MMS , Copy/Paste Better Camera , shoot Video ,use like webcam  etc. 

But yes there be real good stuff upcoming soon !
The Tube is just the beginning of a new level.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My next touchphone be the Nokia 5800 Xpressmusic &#8220;Tube&#8221;<br />
for shoore , yes the touch are nice in iphone but sad it lack all other things you need , like MMS , Copy/Paste Better Camera , shoot Video ,use like webcam  etc. </p>
<p>But yes there be real good stuff upcoming soon !<br />
The Tube is just the beginning of a new level.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
