<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iPhone Pro and iPhone Elite Concepts Hit the Web&#8230; Both Make Me Giddy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.intomobile.com/2008/12/29/iphone-pro-and-iphone-elite-concepts-hit-the-web-both-make-me-giddy.html/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2008/12/29/iphone-pro-and-iphone-elite-concepts-hit-the-web-both-make-me-giddy.html</link>
	<description>Cell Phone News, Information, and Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 01:25:40 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: yanGray</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2008/12/29/iphone-pro-and-iphone-elite-concepts-hit-the-web-both-make-me-giddy.html/comment-page-1/#comment-326677</link>
		<dc:creator>yanGray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 06:03:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/?p=34545#comment-326677</guid>
		<description>Yeah. . . I think Apple &lt;b&gt;should&lt;/b&gt; think about these concepts (gizmodo&#039;s and Mat Brady&#039;s) and not an &quot;iPhone Nano&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah. . . I think Apple <b>should</b> think about these concepts (gizmodo&#8217;s and Mat Brady&#8217;s) and not an &#8220;iPhone Nano&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mat Brady</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2008/12/29/iphone-pro-and-iphone-elite-concepts-hit-the-web-both-make-me-giddy.html/comment-page-1/#comment-326368</link>
		<dc:creator>Mat Brady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 22:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/?p=34545#comment-326368</guid>
		<description>James, thank you for writing about my image and Jesus Diaz&#039;s image in your excellent blog.  You have been very respectful and jeero does not parallel my feelings at all.  If there is one thing that Jesus&#039;s and my iPhone mock-ups have done it has been to generate debate, and a relatively healthy one at that.  It&#039;s amazing what simply seeing an image can do.  Your voice has been one of the most clear and thoughtful responses so far and I have thoroughly enjoyed the points you raised.  

In response to your blog, I believe it comes down to this: 

Apple need to soak up more of the business market and having a slide-out keyboard would allow this to happen fairly easily.  (I was surprised that the keyboard was the feature that received the most positive response from people)  From Apple&#039;s perspective they would be in an internal tug of war between staying with their pure &#039;forward only&#039; innovation angle, or incorporating old tech for the sake of greater profit/market/opportunity/etc.  I don&#039;t think people would hold it against them for too long if they did put in a slide-out keyboard, to be honest.  You&#039;re &quot;business&quot; re-branding idea is perfect.  I&#039;m sure that once the business sector takes up the &quot;iPhone Business&quot; model Apple would slowly phase out the slide-out keyboard once adoption of the touch keypad would have taken place and, of course, if sales figures between the business model and regular model would signal this phase out to happen also.  

If it turns out that touch screens are eventually loved by everyone and that physical keyboards really are a thing of the past, then so be it.  If it turns out that, actually, there are those that even after decades of use people still prefer a physical keyboard as opposed to those who prefer touchscreen typing, then this is fine too.  But without both to explore in the same device we&#039;ll be left to suffer an eternal divide between people buying blackberries and iphones.  What&#039;s ironic here is that Apple would probably garner more people to subscribe to touch screen typing sooner if they were to  include a physical keyboard.  Weird, huh? 

Again, this is a really interesting debate that&#039;s taking place.

Great blog, keep it up.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James, thank you for writing about my image and Jesus Diaz&#8217;s image in your excellent blog.  You have been very respectful and jeero does not parallel my feelings at all.  If there is one thing that Jesus&#8217;s and my iPhone mock-ups have done it has been to generate debate, and a relatively healthy one at that.  It&#8217;s amazing what simply seeing an image can do.  Your voice has been one of the most clear and thoughtful responses so far and I have thoroughly enjoyed the points you raised.  </p>
<p>In response to your blog, I believe it comes down to this: </p>
<p>Apple need to soak up more of the business market and having a slide-out keyboard would allow this to happen fairly easily.  (I was surprised that the keyboard was the feature that received the most positive response from people)  From Apple&#8217;s perspective they would be in an internal tug of war between staying with their pure &#8216;forward only&#8217; innovation angle, or incorporating old tech for the sake of greater profit/market/opportunity/etc.  I don&#8217;t think people would hold it against them for too long if they did put in a slide-out keyboard, to be honest.  You&#8217;re &#8220;business&#8221; re-branding idea is perfect.  I&#8217;m sure that once the business sector takes up the &#8220;iPhone Business&#8221; model Apple would slowly phase out the slide-out keyboard once adoption of the touch keypad would have taken place and, of course, if sales figures between the business model and regular model would signal this phase out to happen also.  </p>
<p>If it turns out that touch screens are eventually loved by everyone and that physical keyboards really are a thing of the past, then so be it.  If it turns out that, actually, there are those that even after decades of use people still prefer a physical keyboard as opposed to those who prefer touchscreen typing, then this is fine too.  But without both to explore in the same device we&#8217;ll be left to suffer an eternal divide between people buying blackberries and iphones.  What&#8217;s ironic here is that Apple would probably garner more people to subscribe to touch screen typing sooner if they were to  include a physical keyboard.  Weird, huh? </p>
<p>Again, this is a really interesting debate that&#8217;s taking place.</p>
<p>Great blog, keep it up.  <img src='http://static.intomobile.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Falconer</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2008/12/29/iphone-pro-and-iphone-elite-concepts-hit-the-web-both-make-me-giddy.html/comment-page-1/#comment-326360</link>
		<dc:creator>James Falconer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 19:14:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/?p=34545#comment-326360</guid>
		<description>jeero,

Last I checked I wasn&#039;t &#039;retarded&#039;. That said, I stated clearly in my post that the original &#039;Elite&#039; concept was from Mat (even linked to the source) and that Mr. Diaz whipped up his awesome version in reaction to the original (linked to his as well). Very clear. Also, I&#039;m not sure how I could have copied/pasted an entire article, when all I did was check out the concepts and write about them off the top of my head. My points, my thoughts, my post. I think we can both agree these concepts are fantastic, certainly something to talk about.

Thanks for your comments though, I have added two more links to the source articles, there are now two links going to each, which I&#039;m sure they will appreciate! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jeero,</p>
<p>Last I checked I wasn&#8217;t &#8216;retarded&#8217;. That said, I stated clearly in my post that the original &#8216;Elite&#8217; concept was from Mat (even linked to the source) and that Mr. Diaz whipped up his awesome version in reaction to the original (linked to his as well). Very clear. Also, I&#8217;m not sure how I could have copied/pasted an entire article, when all I did was check out the concepts and write about them off the top of my head. My points, my thoughts, my post. I think we can both agree these concepts are fantastic, certainly something to talk about.</p>
<p>Thanks for your comments though, I have added two more links to the source articles, there are now two links going to each, which I&#8217;m sure they will appreciate! <img src='http://static.intomobile.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeero</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2008/12/29/iphone-pro-and-iphone-elite-concepts-hit-the-web-both-make-me-giddy.html/comment-page-1/#comment-326339</link>
		<dc:creator>jeero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 17:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/?p=34545#comment-326339</guid>
		<description>Are you retarded? This was originally by Mat, but the version you have posted above was &quot;whipped up&quot; by Jesus Diaz at Gizmodo. It even says his name in the image.

If you are going to copy and paste Jesus&#039; entire article into WordPress and only change a few words, then at least freaking credit the man. (Not that he cares about a little peon like you.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you retarded? This was originally by Mat, but the version you have posted above was &#8220;whipped up&#8221; by Jesus Diaz at Gizmodo. It even says his name in the image.</p>
<p>If you are going to copy and paste Jesus&#8217; entire article into WordPress and only change a few words, then at least freaking credit the man. (Not that he cares about a little peon like you.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
