<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Verizon&#8217;s &#8220;Open Network&#8221; initiative just lip service?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.intomobile.com/2009/01/06/verizons-open-network-initiative-just-lip-service.html/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2009/01/06/verizons-open-network-initiative-just-lip-service.html</link>
	<description>Cell Phone News, Information, and Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 19:46:44 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: N. Buck</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2009/01/06/verizons-open-network-initiative-just-lip-service.html/comment-page-1/#comment-338088</link>
		<dc:creator>N. Buck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 20:56:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/?p=35169#comment-338088</guid>
		<description>Piss Piss Piss.  Will is correct in his statements.  For being so &quot;open&quot; they have kept their mouths CLOSED concerning cell phones.  Let&#039;s go to the Verizon Wireless website.  On here I see . . . OH SNAP . . . Cell Phones!  So that means most of Verizon Wireless customers are looking for . . . OH SNAP . . . Cell Phones.
That means VW is making money off of . . . OH SHOOT . . . Cell Phones.  And to keep that profit rolling they should keep closing their . . . OH JOY! . . . Cell Phones.

VW New slogan when LTE rolls out and there are no open phones or 3rd party apps - &quot;Ha, we got you didn&#039;t we?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Piss Piss Piss.  Will is correct in his statements.  For being so &#8220;open&#8221; they have kept their mouths CLOSED concerning cell phones.  Let&#8217;s go to the Verizon Wireless website.  On here I see . . . OH SNAP . . . Cell Phones!  So that means most of Verizon Wireless customers are looking for . . . OH SNAP . . . Cell Phones.<br />
That means VW is making money off of . . . OH SHOOT . . . Cell Phones.  And to keep that profit rolling they should keep closing their . . . OH JOY! . . . Cell Phones.</p>
<p>VW New slogan when LTE rolls out and there are no open phones or 3rd party apps &#8211; &#8220;Ha, we got you didn&#8217;t we?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janet</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2009/01/06/verizons-open-network-initiative-just-lip-service.html/comment-page-1/#comment-332055</link>
		<dc:creator>Janet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 17:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/?p=35169#comment-332055</guid>
		<description>How is it that it&#039;s Verizon&#039;s fault when it is the global economic crisis that makes funding impossible for anyone to do stuff?

Verizon approved AirVoice&#039;s phone, but AirVoice doesn&#039;t have the money to launch the phone --- not Verizon&#039;s fault.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How is it that it&#8217;s Verizon&#8217;s fault when it is the global economic crisis that makes funding impossible for anyone to do stuff?</p>
<p>Verizon approved AirVoice&#8217;s phone, but AirVoice doesn&#8217;t have the money to launch the phone &#8212; not Verizon&#8217;s fault.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snidely</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2009/01/06/verizons-open-network-initiative-just-lip-service.html/comment-page-1/#comment-327032</link>
		<dc:creator>Snidely</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 09:47:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/?p=35169#comment-327032</guid>
		<description>Will, how many consumer-focused CDMA devices even exist outside of the traditional manufacturers?  Of course industry and business-specific devices would be the first ones approved; that&#039;s where the demand is.  I always saw the open network as a way for Sprint/Alltel/other CDMA customers to bring their existing handsets to VZ.  I doubt VZ will ever go to the trouble of certifying some Sprint verisioned phone as approved.  With CDMA in major decline no start-up device manufacturer is going to make CDMA phones without selling them through the carrier channel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will, how many consumer-focused CDMA devices even exist outside of the traditional manufacturers?  Of course industry and business-specific devices would be the first ones approved; that&#8217;s where the demand is.  I always saw the open network as a way for Sprint/Alltel/other CDMA customers to bring their existing handsets to VZ.  I doubt VZ will ever go to the trouble of certifying some Sprint verisioned phone as approved.  With CDMA in major decline no start-up device manufacturer is going to make CDMA phones without selling them through the carrier channel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2009/01/06/verizons-open-network-initiative-just-lip-service.html/comment-page-1/#comment-326991</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 22:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/?p=35169#comment-326991</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m pretty sure the open network policy only applies to the 700mhz spectrum, which hasn&#039;t materialized as a network quite yet, but when the 4g lte stuff starts happening hopefully they&#039;ll be true to the open network stuff. I believe that was the stipulation put in by the fcc when the bid reached a certain number and why google pushed it up that high. So for now, they don&#039;t really have to be open at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m pretty sure the open network policy only applies to the 700mhz spectrum, which hasn&#8217;t materialized as a network quite yet, but when the 4g lte stuff starts happening hopefully they&#8217;ll be true to the open network stuff. I believe that was the stipulation put in by the fcc when the bid reached a certain number and why google pushed it up that high. So for now, they don&#8217;t really have to be open at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
