<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Please don&#8217;t let this be Windows Mobile 6.5!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.intomobile.com/2009/01/21/please-dont-let-this-be-windows-mobile-65.html/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2009/01/21/please-dont-let-this-be-windows-mobile-65.html</link>
	<description>Cell Phone News, Information, and Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 11:05:07 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2009/01/21/please-dont-let-this-be-windows-mobile-65.html/comment-page-1/#comment-327967</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 06:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/?p=36904#comment-327967</guid>
		<description>heh, somehow despite my lack of faith in Microsoft&#039;s ability to execute (Windows 7 may actually be the exception) I don&#039;t think it could possibly be this bad. It&#039;s either a skin or a developers hack-job version.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>heh, somehow despite my lack of faith in Microsoft&#8217;s ability to execute (Windows 7 may actually be the exception) I don&#8217;t think it could possibly be this bad. It&#8217;s either a skin or a developers hack-job version.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2009/01/21/please-dont-let-this-be-windows-mobile-65.html/comment-page-1/#comment-327958</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 04:14:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/?p=36904#comment-327958</guid>
		<description>Good grief.  You need to revamp this story.

It&#039;s probably just pictures of a Chinese phone with fake WM, just as they do fake Apple stuff.

And the &quot;previously leaked&quot; screenshots were clearly some kids&#039; idea, since everything in it was misspelled.  I thought they&#039;d been debunked a while ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good grief.  You need to revamp this story.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s probably just pictures of a Chinese phone with fake WM, just as they do fake Apple stuff.</p>
<p>And the &#8220;previously leaked&#8221; screenshots were clearly some kids&#8217; idea, since everything in it was misspelled.  I thought they&#8217;d been debunked a while ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ezra olubi</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2009/01/21/please-dont-let-this-be-windows-mobile-65.html/comment-page-1/#comment-327948</link>
		<dc:creator>ezra olubi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 22:28:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/?p=36904#comment-327948</guid>
		<description>@odpoa.com
Yea, sure that&#039;s a manufacturer&#039;s design. but that aint the WinMo kernel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@odpoa.com<br />
Yea, sure that&#8217;s a manufacturer&#8217;s design. but that aint the WinMo kernel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ODPOA.COM</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2009/01/21/please-dont-let-this-be-windows-mobile-65.html/comment-page-1/#comment-327943</link>
		<dc:creator>ODPOA.COM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 21:08:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/?p=36904#comment-327943</guid>
		<description>Um... You do know that manufacturer&#039;s have access to the Windows Mobile kernel, for customizations and so forth to take place. So... Most likely, you are seeing an manufacturer&#039;s design. IF it looks like s*** you can always mod it.

- Source: MSDN</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um&#8230; You do know that manufacturer&#8217;s have access to the Windows Mobile kernel, for customizations and so forth to take place. So&#8230; Most likely, you are seeing an manufacturer&#8217;s design. IF it looks like s*** you can always mod it.</p>
<p>- Source: MSDN</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ezra olubi</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2009/01/21/please-dont-let-this-be-windows-mobile-65.html/comment-page-1/#comment-327942</link>
		<dc:creator>ezra olubi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 21:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/?p=36904#comment-327942</guid>
		<description>how the hell can this be windows mobile? cant you see its a freaking chinese UI? or are u blind to the obvious courier fonts?

and did u say this is on par wit WinMo6.1? this is a freaking step backwards... lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how the hell can this be windows mobile? cant you see its a freaking chinese UI? or are u blind to the obvious courier fonts?</p>
<p>and did u say this is on par wit WinMo6.1? this is a freaking step backwards&#8230; lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
