<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hello Kitty gets an iPhone app</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.intomobile.com/2009/01/27/hello-kitty-gets-an-iphone-app.html/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2009/01/27/hello-kitty-gets-an-iphone-app.html</link>
	<description>Cell Phone News, Information, and Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 18:05:46 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: sonyanews</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2009/01/27/hello-kitty-gets-an-iphone-app.html/comment-page-1/#comment-328280</link>
		<dc:creator>sonyanews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 20:08:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/?p=37476#comment-328280</guid>
		<description>Please tell me why this is not a web app? Why go to the trouble of making this an application? If the answer is the hope to make money from charging the high price of $4.99 then maybe the developer should have just built a web app with a Hello Kitty game and integrated ads into the mobile site. Seems to me that would offer more recurring revenue for the developer and the audience would be larger than is possible with charging $4.99 for an app.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please tell me why this is not a web app? Why go to the trouble of making this an application? If the answer is the hope to make money from charging the high price of $4.99 then maybe the developer should have just built a web app with a Hello Kitty game and integrated ads into the mobile site. Seems to me that would offer more recurring revenue for the developer and the audience would be larger than is possible with charging $4.99 for an app.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
