<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Did Google omit multi-touch for Android OS on Apple&#8217;s request?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.intomobile.com/2009/02/10/did-google-omit-multi-touch-for-android-os-on-apples-request.html/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2009/02/10/did-google-omit-multi-touch-for-android-os-on-apples-request.html</link>
	<description>Cell Phone News, Information, and Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 11:05:07 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2009/02/10/did-google-omit-multi-touch-for-android-os-on-apples-request.html/comment-page-1/#comment-329674</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 22:22:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/?p=38971#comment-329674</guid>
		<description>Why do articles keep pretending that Apple has a patent on multi-touch?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do articles keep pretending that Apple has a patent on multi-touch?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
