<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who knew the iPhone camera was this good?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.intomobile.com/2009/03/01/who-knew-the-iphone-camera-was-this-good.html/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2009/03/01/who-knew-the-iphone-camera-was-this-good.html</link>
	<description>Cell Phone News, Information, and Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 22:02:56 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Damian</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2009/03/01/who-knew-the-iphone-camera-was-this-good.html/comment-page-1/#comment-331870</link>
		<dc:creator>Damian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 02:37:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/?p=41362#comment-331870</guid>
		<description>Can anyone say Photoshop? These images are not the original photos, they&#039;re processed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can anyone say Photoshop? These images are not the original photos, they&#8217;re processed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jon</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2009/03/01/who-knew-the-iphone-camera-was-this-good.html/comment-page-1/#comment-331829</link>
		<dc:creator>jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 22:09:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/?p=41362#comment-331829</guid>
		<description>noah, you must stop being a troll...with decent light, the iphone is one of the best 2mp shooters out there...its actually very good...and means its suited for small prints, not stamp

i guess you´re just a really crap photographer...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>noah, you must stop being a troll&#8230;with decent light, the iphone is one of the best 2mp shooters out there&#8230;its actually very good&#8230;and means its suited for small prints, not stamp</p>
<p>i guess you´re just a really crap photographer&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brian</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2009/03/01/who-knew-the-iphone-camera-was-this-good.html/comment-page-1/#comment-331667</link>
		<dc:creator>brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 20:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/?p=41362#comment-331667</guid>
		<description>Having managed to take moderately good pics (when as noted, sized appropriately) with crappy phone cams for years, I can say I&#039;m not surprised. But then, anyone who knows anything will tell you that even  the butt of a droopy tailed dog gets a little sunlight once in a while. Let&#039;s see the other 9,999 shots that don&#039;t quite come off that well. Oh, and throw some 640 X 480, 30 fps video in there too.  I enjoy almost everything about the iPhone but the camera is possibly the largest deal breaker for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having managed to take moderately good pics (when as noted, sized appropriately) with crappy phone cams for years, I can say I&#8217;m not surprised. But then, anyone who knows anything will tell you that even  the butt of a droopy tailed dog gets a little sunlight once in a while. Let&#8217;s see the other 9,999 shots that don&#8217;t quite come off that well. Oh, and throw some 640 X 480, 30 fps video in there too.  I enjoy almost everything about the iPhone but the camera is possibly the largest deal breaker for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noah</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2009/03/01/who-knew-the-iphone-camera-was-this-good.html/comment-page-1/#comment-331665</link>
		<dc:creator>Noah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 20:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/?p=41362#comment-331665</guid>
		<description>...except that it needs to be postage-stamp sized to look any good. Click Original size on any of the photos and have a look.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;except that it needs to be postage-stamp sized to look any good. Click Original size on any of the photos and have a look.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
