<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WiMax or LTE? Your thoughts are welcome!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.intomobile.com/2009/03/31/wimax-or-lte-your-thoughts-are-welcome.html/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2009/03/31/wimax-or-lte-your-thoughts-are-welcome.html</link>
	<description>Cell Phone News, Information, and Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 08:47:50 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Kieth Daniels</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2009/03/31/wimax-or-lte-your-thoughts-are-welcome.html/comment-page-1/#comment-335811</link>
		<dc:creator>Kieth Daniels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 02:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/?p=44978#comment-335811</guid>
		<description>I think they will co-exist with LTE controlling true mobile devices and WiMAX for stationary devices and laptops. AT&amp;T and Verizon are clearly going with LTE. I would bet on a steady migration to LTE as equipment costs drop and the coverage areas being so widespread. Also, devices will become more and more exclusively mobile, iphone-like high-speed internet access tools. This will be a long process and I see a level of co-existance for at least 3-5 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think they will co-exist with LTE controlling true mobile devices and WiMAX for stationary devices and laptops. AT&amp;T and Verizon are clearly going with LTE. I would bet on a steady migration to LTE as equipment costs drop and the coverage areas being so widespread. Also, devices will become more and more exclusively mobile, iphone-like high-speed internet access tools. This will be a long process and I see a level of co-existance for at least 3-5 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Leong</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2009/03/31/wimax-or-lte-your-thoughts-are-welcome.html/comment-page-1/#comment-335705</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Leong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 16:07:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/?p=44978#comment-335705</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s no technical reason why a WiMAX device couldn&#039;t be dual mode so that you fall back on 3G/2G service as well.  WiMAX and LTE are both based on 4G technology (OFDM, MIMO, IP architecture) and in fact the differences between them seem to be some timing issues and a difference in the uplink.  Neither of which would make one more compatible to 3G/2G.  So the main differences seem to be political which would explain why there are 2 different standards that are pretty much the same.  1 requires a SIM card and all that jazz, and the other is built in and you use it when you want.  All other things being equal, I&#039;ll take the ease of use anyday.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s no technical reason why a WiMAX device couldn&#8217;t be dual mode so that you fall back on 3G/2G service as well.  WiMAX and LTE are both based on 4G technology (OFDM, MIMO, IP architecture) and in fact the differences between them seem to be some timing issues and a difference in the uplink.  Neither of which would make one more compatible to 3G/2G.  So the main differences seem to be political which would explain why there are 2 different standards that are pretty much the same.  1 requires a SIM card and all that jazz, and the other is built in and you use it when you want.  All other things being equal, I&#8217;ll take the ease of use anyday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ali</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2009/03/31/wimax-or-lte-your-thoughts-are-welcome.html/comment-page-1/#comment-335690</link>
		<dc:creator>Ali</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 11:05:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/?p=44978#comment-335690</guid>
		<description>LTE for sure.
1- LTE devices, it can keep you connected while on the move. Wimax can do the same but it is a little slower when connecting from 1 basestation to another. And in wimax it HAS to be the latest standard (which is 802.16e). 
2- LTE will have better power consumption, wmax will be difficult to exceed it.
3- GSM (GPRS,EDGE,HSPA,HSPA+) already exists so it is a very good failsafe in the event that there is no LTE, wimax has nothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LTE for sure.<br />
1- LTE devices, it can keep you connected while on the move. Wimax can do the same but it is a little slower when connecting from 1 basestation to another. And in wimax it HAS to be the latest standard (which is 802.16e).<br />
2- LTE will have better power consumption, wmax will be difficult to exceed it.<br />
3- GSM (GPRS,EDGE,HSPA,HSPA+) already exists so it is a very good failsafe in the event that there is no LTE, wimax has nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tanio Amadeus</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2009/03/31/wimax-or-lte-your-thoughts-are-welcome.html/comment-page-1/#comment-335647</link>
		<dc:creator>Tanio Amadeus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 21:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/?p=44978#comment-335647</guid>
		<description>I Think Wimax will win out.  It is first to market, less expensive and very strong backers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I Think Wimax will win out.  It is first to market, less expensive and very strong backers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
