<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cartier sues Apple over trademark infringement [updated]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.intomobile.com/2009/05/23/cartier-sues-apple-over-trademark-infringement.html/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2009/05/23/cartier-sues-apple-over-trademark-infringement.html</link>
	<description>Cell Phone News, Information, and Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 08:47:50 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: sloane</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2009/05/23/cartier-sues-apple-over-trademark-infringement.html/comment-page-1/#comment-341625</link>
		<dc:creator>sloane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 18:07:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/?p=50527#comment-341625</guid>
		<description>John Tantillo named Apple the weekly brand winner on his  &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.marketingdoctor.tv&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;marketing blog&lt;/a&gt; (once again) for the way they handled this situation, saying it&#039;s a great example of how successful marketing requires constant corrections/adjustments to a company&#039;s course - &quot;the key is responding promptly and correctly to evolving realities.&quot;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.marketingdoctor.tv/2009/05/24/john-tantillos-brand-winner-and-loser-apple-and-schwarzenegger.aspx&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; Full post &lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Tantillo named Apple the weekly brand winner on his  <a href="http://blog.marketingdoctor.tv" rel="nofollow">marketing blog</a> (once again) for the way they handled this situation, saying it&#8217;s a great example of how successful marketing requires constant corrections/adjustments to a company&#8217;s course &#8211; &#8220;the key is responding promptly and correctly to evolving realities.&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://blog.marketingdoctor.tv/2009/05/24/john-tantillos-brand-winner-and-loser-apple-and-schwarzenegger.aspx" rel="nofollow"> Full post </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sleepy</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2009/05/23/cartier-sues-apple-over-trademark-infringement.html/comment-page-1/#comment-341034</link>
		<dc:creator>sleepy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 10:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/?p=50527#comment-341034</guid>
		<description>Cartier want to prevent people publishing pictures of their products? Make sure keep yours concealed in public, in case someone takes a picture. 

Or is it that the hands go round in the picture, making it a copy of a Cartier watch? Or are they afraid that customers might realise what an utterly pointless, obsolete product a Cartier watch is, because they will see for themselves that a pointless animated picture is just as good? (I haven&#039;t worn a watch for ten years, nor any mechanical watch for 25 years).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cartier want to prevent people publishing pictures of their products? Make sure keep yours concealed in public, in case someone takes a picture. </p>
<p>Or is it that the hands go round in the picture, making it a copy of a Cartier watch? Or are they afraid that customers might realise what an utterly pointless, obsolete product a Cartier watch is, because they will see for themselves that a pointless animated picture is just as good? (I haven&#8217;t worn a watch for ten years, nor any mechanical watch for 25 years).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2009/05/23/cartier-sues-apple-over-trademark-infringement.html/comment-page-1/#comment-341018</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 03:57:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/?p=50527#comment-341018</guid>
		<description>Apple deserves every copyright infringement case that comes their way. After the way they jumped all over anyone whom they perceived as violating their iPhone copyrighted materials, they deserve a serious taste of their own medicine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple deserves every copyright infringement case that comes their way. After the way they jumped all over anyone whom they perceived as violating their iPhone copyrighted materials, they deserve a serious taste of their own medicine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
