<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>IntoMobile &#187; Stefan Constantinescu</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.intomobile.com/author/stefan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.intomobile.com</link>
	<description>IntoMobile delivers breaking news, information, and analysis on the latest cell phones and cell phone technology.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 00:21:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Kyocera Hydro coming to Boost Mobile: $130 buys you a waterproof Ice Cream Sandwich</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2012/07/18/kyocera-hydro-coming-boost-mobile-130-buys-you-waterproof-ice-cream-sandwich/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intomobile.com/2012/07/18/kyocera-hydro-coming-boost-mobile-130-buys-you-waterproof-ice-cream-sandwich/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2012 08:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stefan Constantinescu</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boost Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kyocera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sprint]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/?p=358427</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Boost Mobile, one of the many mobile virtual network operators who piggy back on Sprint&#8217;s dilapidated 3G network, is going to offer a smartphone dubbed the &#8220;Hydro&#8221; on August 3rd for $130. Said smartphone is made by Kyocera and it&#8217;s called the Hydro because it&#8217;s splash proof and water proof up to one meter for 30 minutes. Under the hood there&#8217;s a 1 GHz processor, Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich, a 3.2 megapixel camera, and a 3.5 inch display that pushes 480 x 320 pixels. For $130, it&#8217;s not that <span style="white-space:nowrap">... <a href="http://www.intomobile.com/2012/07/18/kyocera-hydro-coming-boost-mobile-130-buys-you-waterproof-ice-cream-sandwich/">Read more</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boost Mobile, one of the many mobile virtual network operators who piggy back on Sprint&#8217;s dilapidated 3G network, is going to offer a smartphone <a href="http://www.theverge.com/2012/7/17/3164615/waterproof-kyocera-hydro-boost-pricing-availability">dubbed the &#8220;Hydro&#8221; on August 3rd for $130</a>. Said smartphone is made by Kyocera and it&#8217;s called the Hydro because it&#8217;s splash proof and water proof up to one meter for 30 minutes. Under the hood there&#8217;s a 1 GHz processor, Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich, a 3.2 megapixel camera, and a 3.5 inch display that pushes 480 x 320 pixels. For $130, it&#8217;s not that bad considering what you&#8217;re getting. This thing is clearly targeted at people who&#8217;ve never owned a smartphone before. Can you get something better at that price point on another network? Not really. Even if you&#8217;re willing to go on the second hand market, there aren&#8217;t many devices out there that will run Ice Cream Sandwich. Sure, there&#8217;s the whole custom ROM thing, but that&#8217;s not very mainstream.</p>
<p><center><iframe width="610" height="343" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/3_O8bUxcd6k?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></center></p>
<p>We can&#8217;t stress this enough however, Sprint&#8217;s 3G network has gone to complete shit after they started selling the iPhone. Everyone bought one, and everyone is using one, so the data speeds are terrible. We&#8217;re talking surfing the internet at the equivalent speed that a dial up modem delivered back in 1997. If you go with Straight Talk then you&#8217;ll be connected to AT&#038;T&#8217;s network, which itself has some problems, but it&#8217;s much better than anything Sprint currently has deployed. They&#8217;re offering the Huawei Ascend II and the ZTE Merit for $99 and $129 respectively. Both run Android 2.3, both have a 5 megapixel camera, and both have a 600 MHz processor. Despite that, they&#8217;ll be connected to a better network, and isn&#8217;t that what really counts at the end of the day?</p>
<p>But hey, if you know you have good Sprint coverage in your part of the country, or you know friends who have Sprint and don&#8217;t have any issues with their service, then $130 for a device running Android 4.0 is pretty damn cool.</p>
<p>[Additional Reading: <a href="http://www.mobileburn.com/19503/gallery/hands-on-with-the-kyocera-hydro-android-40-smartphone">MobileBurn's hands-on of the Hydro from May 2012.</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intomobile.com/2012/07/18/kyocera-hydro-coming-boost-mobile-130-buys-you-waterproof-ice-cream-sandwich/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More iOS 6 features coming to the iPhone 3GS than previously thought</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2012/07/18/more-ios-6-features-coming-iphone-3gs-than-previously-thought/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intomobile.com/2012/07/18/more-ios-6-features-coming-iphone-3gs-than-previously-thought/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2012 08:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stefan Constantinescu</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iOS / iPhone OS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/?p=358369</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When Apple announced that the three year old iPhone 3GS was going to get iOS 6, that was a huge slap in the face to everyone who bitches and moans about not getting the latest version of Android on their non-Nexus device. Two weeks later Microsoft announced that Windows Phone 8 is going to require new hardware, and that made owners of the three month old AT&#038;T Nokia Lumia 900 flip over dining room tables all across the United States. But back to iOS, just because the 3GS is getting <span style="white-space:nowrap">... <a href="http://www.intomobile.com/2012/07/18/more-ios-6-features-coming-iphone-3gs-than-previously-thought/">Read more</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Apple announced that the <strong>three year old</strong> iPhone 3GS was going to get iOS 6, that was a huge slap in the face to everyone who bitches and moans about not getting the latest version of Android on their non-Nexus device. Two weeks later Microsoft announced that Windows Phone 8 is going to require new hardware, and that made owners of the <strong>three month old</strong> AT&#038;T Nokia Lumia 900 flip over dining room tables all across the United States. But back to iOS, just because the 3GS is getting the latest version of Apple&#8217;s operating system, that doesn&#8217;t mean it&#8217;s getting all the features. Things like turn by turn navigation and Siri remain exclusive to the iPhone 4S, which make iPhone 4 owners sad, but c&#8217;est la vie. If you have an iPhone 3GS however, you need to understand that you&#8217;re not really getting anything except for a vague sense of comfort that Apple still recognizes your device as being useful.</p>
<p>Today that changes. According to <em><a href="http://www.theverge.com/2012/7/17/3164946/iphone-3gs-ios-6-beta-features">The Verge</a></em>, two iOS 6 features that originally were meant for the iPhone 4 and iPhone 4S are now coming to the 3GS. The first, shared Photo Streams, is something that lets you subscribe to another iPhone&#8217;s camera roll. So say there&#8217;s a family with two kids and the kids each have a 3GS because it&#8217;s cheap. Those children can now subscribe to each other&#8217;s Photo Streams so they can see what pictures they&#8217;ve taken at school. They can also subscribe to their parent&#8217;s Photo Streams should they want to see what Mom and Dad do at work.</p>
<p>The second feature, VIP Mail, is basically an email filter that shows you only messages from people you have on your VIP list. So say you want to see everything from your partner, your family, and the colleagues you&#8217;re working with on a specific project. Put them all on the VIP list and you&#8217;ll only see emails from them.</p>
<p>We wish the iPhone 3GS was getting more, but hey, these features are welcome for a phone that was launched in the summer of 2009!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intomobile.com/2012/07/18/more-ios-6-features-coming-iphone-3gs-than-previously-thought/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HTC wants a third of their revenue to come from China by the end of 2012</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2012/07/18/htc-wants-third-their-revenue-come-china-end-2012/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intomobile.com/2012/07/18/htc-wants-third-their-revenue-come-china-end-2012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2012 07:47:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stefan Constantinescu</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/?p=358357</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[HTC is hurting. Their devices aren&#8217;t meeting expectations in Europe, the One X faced some legal issues in the United States that delayed sales, and Samsung has proven that they have better relationships with the operators than even Apple has with AT&#038;T and Verizon. According to a report from DigiTimes, roughly 80% of HTC&#8217;s revenues currently come from Europe and the United States. They want to change that. Their goal is to have one third (33%) of their revenue coming from China by the end of this year. Should we <span style="white-space:nowrap">... <a href="http://www.intomobile.com/2012/07/18/htc-wants-third-their-revenue-come-china-end-2012/">Read more</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HTC is hurting. Their devices <a href="http://www.intomobile.com/2012/07/06/htcs-q2-2012-profits-57-lower-than-same-quarter-year-ago/">aren&#8217;t meeting expectations in Europe</a>, the One X <a href="http://www.theverge.com/2012/5/15/3022907/at-t-htc-one-x-blocked-at-us-customs-infringing-apple">faced some legal issues</a> in the United States that delayed sales, and Samsung has proven that they have better relationships with the operators than even Apple has with AT&#038;T and Verizon. According to a report from <em><a href="http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:hzqlS2DtPQEJ:www.digitimes.com/news/a20120712PD217.html+&#038;cd=1&#038;hl=en&#038;ct=clnk">DigiTimes</a></em>, roughly 80% of HTC&#8217;s revenues currently come from Europe and the United States. They want to change that. Their goal is to have one third (33%) of their revenue coming from China by the end of this year. Should we interpret this as a sign that HTC has recognized that they&#8217;re simply not competitive enough in the West? Or should we think about this news another way, that HTC is thinking about their future? We&#8217;d like to remind you that something special happened in November 2011: <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/11/23/china_overtakes_us_biggest_smartphone/">China became the world&#8217;s largest smartphone market</a>. They stole that title from the United States. Now yes, the kinds of smartphones that Americans buy are several times more expensive than the smartphones typically sold in China, but on the flip side there are more than 4x as many Chinese people in China than American people in America.</p>
<p>If HTC is serious about having China being responsible for a larger portion of their business, then we hope they know what they&#8217;re getting themselves into. Think about all the local brands in that market that release devices for a fraction of the cost of an equivalent Samsung or Nokia handset. And when it comes to the high end, Apple&#8217;s got that section of the market to themselves.</p>
<p>Where did HTC go wrong? Their devices are great, but they don&#8217;t have the distribution channels that the big boys have. That and at the end of the day they don&#8217;t really make anything themselves other than Sense UI. Their chips come from Qualcomm, their software is made by Google, so what sort of value are they adding?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intomobile.com/2012/07/18/htc-wants-third-their-revenue-come-china-end-2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chinese handset vendors to release $50 Android smartphones this year</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2012/07/18/chinese-handset-vendors-release-50-android-smartphones-year/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intomobile.com/2012/07/18/chinese-handset-vendors-release-50-android-smartphones-year/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2012 07:24:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stefan Constantinescu</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/?p=358347</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you want a brand spanking new iPhone 4S, prepare to cough up over $650. Want a Galaxy S III? That&#8217;ll be $600 please. The Galaxy Nexus is an absolute bargin at $350, but what about $100? That&#8217;s today&#8217;s bar for low end smartphones. Sure, such devices typically have QVGA screens and processors that have transistors made out of vacuum tubes, but it doesn&#8217;t matter since they run Android. That means they have Gmail, Google Maps, an extremely competent web browser, and access to a massive library of applications. According <span style="white-space:nowrap">... <a href="http://www.intomobile.com/2012/07/18/chinese-handset-vendors-release-50-android-smartphones-year/">Read more</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you want a brand spanking new iPhone 4S, prepare to cough up over $650. Want a Galaxy S III? That&#8217;ll be $600 please. The Galaxy Nexus is an absolute bargin at $350, but what about $100? That&#8217;s today&#8217;s bar for low end smartphones. Sure, such devices typically have QVGA screens and  processors that have transistors made out of vacuum tubes, but it doesn&#8217;t matter since they run Android. That means they have Gmail, Google Maps, an extremely competent web browser, and access to a massive library of applications. According to a report from <em><a href="http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:YumHlOvVQgYJ:www.digitimes.com/news/a20120712PD224.html+&#038;cd=1&#038;hl=en&#038;ct=clnk">DigiTimes</a></em>, that $100 price point is going to be halved during the second half of 2012. They say that Chinese handset vendors are going to introduce smartphones that cost just 300 Chinese yuan on the local market. Translation: Roughly $47. It should be stressed that these devices will probably never leave China, but they&#8217;ll likely drive the larger players to introduce even cheaper smartphones.</p>
<p>What sort of specs will these $50 devices have? The report doesn&#8217;t go into details, but they do say that said phones will have 3G connectivity. We&#8217;ll confess, if Chinese companies can make a $50 phone that has 3G, WiFi, and GPS, then we&#8217;ll simply stop covering feature phones since they&#8217;re no longer going to be relevant.</p>
<p>Looking at this news from another angle, how much better will a $100 smartphone be in early 2013 compared to a $100 smartphone on today&#8217;s market? Are we finally going to see the death of QVGA screens at the $100 price point? Dare we say it, are we going to start seeing dual core processors at the $150 price point?</p>
<p>We understand that many of you probably don&#8217;t care about these budget devices, but you have to think about how far we&#8217;ve come during the past five years. You can buy five or six Android smartphones today with the same specifications as the first generation iPhone for the same price as today&#8217;s iPhone.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s incredible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intomobile.com/2012/07/18/chinese-handset-vendors-release-50-android-smartphones-year/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple patents the hiding vertical scrolling indicator; cue the lawsuits</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2012/07/17/apple-patents-hiding-vertical-scrolling-indicator-cue-lawsuits/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intomobile.com/2012/07/17/apple-patents-hiding-vertical-scrolling-indicator-cue-lawsuits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2012 06:58:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stefan Constantinescu</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Patents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/?p=358339</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chances are that the computer you&#8217;re using right now has a vertical sidebar that tells you where you are on the page. Drag it down and the page moves down. Magic, right? Apple introduced a &#8220;feature&#8221; in iOS whereby that vertical sidebar disappears when you&#8217;re not scrolling anymore. Why? It&#8217;s pretty, but it&#8217;s actually quite functional when you consider how small the screen is on a mobile phone. Anyway, that disappearing act has now been patented according to The Verge. If you look at the patent itself [PDF document] you&#8217;ll <span style="white-space:nowrap">... <a href="http://www.intomobile.com/2012/07/17/apple-patents-hiding-vertical-scrolling-indicator-cue-lawsuits/">Read more</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chances are that the computer you&#8217;re using right now has a vertical sidebar that tells you where you are on the page. Drag it down and the page moves down. Magic, right? Apple introduced a &#8220;feature&#8221; in iOS whereby that vertical sidebar disappears when you&#8217;re not scrolling anymore. Why? It&#8217;s pretty, but it&#8217;s actually quite functional when you consider how small the screen is on a mobile phone. Anyway, that disappearing act has now been patented according to <em><a href="http://www.theverge.com/2012/7/17/3165237/intellectual-properly-apple-patents-disappearing-vertical-scroll-bars">The Verge</a></em>. If you look at the patent itself [<a href="http://assets.sbnation.com/assets/1241669/US8223134B1.pdf">PDF document</a>] you&#8217;ll notice two key things. First, Scott Forstall (pictured above), Senior Vice President of iOS at Apple, is listed as one of the five inventors who came up with concept. That&#8217;s impressive. Second, the patent was filed in March 2012, which means it took just four months to process. That&#8217;s extremely strange since some patents dating back from more than a decade ago are only just now being approved.</p>
<p>Anyway, what does this patent mean for you? It&#8217;s additional ammunition that Apple can use against their competitors in court. The report from <em>The Verge</em> has a screenshot of Android that features the disappearing vertical scrolling bar, so how long do you think it&#8217;ll take until Apple tries to ban yet another Samsung device from entering the market?</p>
<p>We&#8217;d like to point out that Microsoft uses the same sort of scrolling indicator throughout Windows 8, so does that mean Apple will sue Microsoft? We don&#8217;t think so, mainly because of the relationship that both companies formed in 1997. In case you forgot, Apple almost went bankrupt, but Microsoft threw them $150 million to keep on chugging along. Think Steve Ballmer regrets that investment? Probably.</p>
<p>As always, we want to stress that this patent stuff is pure bullshit, but we have to cover it since it&#8217;s relevant to our industry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intomobile.com/2012/07/17/apple-patents-hiding-vertical-scrolling-indicator-cue-lawsuits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New NXP chip aims to make annoying ringtones up to 5x louder</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2012/07/17/new-nxp-chip-aims-make-annoying-ringtones-up-5x-louder/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intomobile.com/2012/07/17/new-nxp-chip-aims-make-annoying-ringtones-up-5x-louder/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2012 06:39:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stefan Constantinescu</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hottest Hardware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/?p=358325</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NXP Semiconductors has just announced a new chip called the TFA9887. It combines a DSP, class-D amplifier, and DC-to-DC boost converter to enable the dinky little speakers in your smartphone or tablet to output sound that&#8217;s up to 5x louder than what they&#8217;re normally capable of delivering. What strange form of voodoo makes all this possible? The engineering is best explained in the seven minute video below, but here&#8217;s the layman&#8217;s explanation: This new chip includes a sensor that tracks how the speaker is performing. The audio that&#8217;s outputted is <span style="white-space:nowrap">... <a href="http://www.intomobile.com/2012/07/17/new-nxp-chip-aims-make-annoying-ringtones-up-5x-louder/">Read more</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NXP Semiconductors has <a href="http://www.nxp.com/news/press-releases/2012/07/revolutionary-mobile-audio-solution-delivers-over-5-times-the-power-to-micro-speakers.html">just announced a new chip called the TFA9887</a>. It combines a DSP, class-D amplifier, and DC-to-DC boost converter to enable the dinky little speakers in your smartphone or tablet to output sound that&#8217;s up to 5x louder than what they&#8217;re normally capable of delivering. What strange form of voodoo makes all this possible?</p>
<p>The engineering is best explained in the seven minute video below, but here&#8217;s the layman&#8217;s explanation: This new chip includes a sensor that tracks how the speaker is performing. The audio that&#8217;s outputted is tuned to the performance characteristics of the speaker in question. Instead of simply boosting the audio signal evenly, which could damage the speaker, NXP&#8217;s new chip makes sure that only the right frequencies are boosted. So when will we see smartphones on the market that use the TFA9887? That&#8217;s a good question. NXP says samples are immediately available, so our gut feeling is that you&#8217;ll have to wait until the second half of 2013 to see this chip in retail hardware.</p>
<p><center><iframe width="610" height="343" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/oLMXCTvCB70?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></center></p>
<p>We hope you guys realize that the creation of the TFA9887 has some extremely negative implications. Those assholes who forget to silence their phones during a movie? Their phone is going to be deafening. The people who ride the bus and let their phone ring and ring and ring because they don&#8217;t want to answer, they&#8217;re going to be up to 5x more irritating. And let&#8217;s not forget about the teenagers who think that they have the best taste in music. You&#8217;re going to be hearing the theme song to Jersey Shore and Teen Mom at volumes that might drive you to commit an act of murder.</p>
<p>All joking aside, we&#8217;re happy that NXP invented this chip because today&#8217;s phones aren&#8217;t as loud as the phones from a few years ago. Why? Because they&#8217;re ultra skinny, so you physically can&#8217;t shove better speakers in there.</p>
<p>[Via: <a href="http://www.allaboutsymbian.com/flow/item/15283_New_audio_system_promises_loud.php">All About Symbian</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intomobile.com/2012/07/17/new-nxp-chip-aims-make-annoying-ringtones-up-5x-louder/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>First Nanoradio, now CSR, what exactly is Samsung up to?</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2012/07/17/first-nanoradio-now-csr-exactly-samsung-up/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intomobile.com/2012/07/17/first-nanoradio-now-csr-exactly-samsung-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2012 10:59:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stefan Constantinescu</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/?p=358183</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Samsung has just announced that they&#8217;ve purchased CSR&#8217;s mobile phone connectivity and location technology for $310 million. They&#8217;re also getting 21 patents in the deal. Never heard of CSR? They were founded in 1998 as &#8220;Cambridge Silicon Radio&#8221; and they&#8217;ve done things such as design Bluetooth, WiFI, and GPS chips. The thing is, no one buys individual chips like that anymore in today&#8217;s market. Companies call up someone like Qualcomm and buy their Snapdragon product which integrates a CPU, GPU, Bluetooth, WiFi, GPS, 2G, 3G, and even 4G LTE. Samsung <span style="white-space:nowrap">... <a href="http://www.intomobile.com/2012/07/17/first-nanoradio-now-csr-exactly-samsung-up/">Read more</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Samsung has just announced that they&#8217;ve <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/samsung-buys-chipmaker-csrs-handset-technology-062216629--sector.html">purchased CSR&#8217;s mobile phone connectivity and location technology for $310 million</a>. They&#8217;re also getting 21 patents in the deal. Never heard of CSR? They were founded in 1998 as &#8220;Cambridge Silicon Radio&#8221; and they&#8217;ve done things such as design Bluetooth, WiFI, and GPS chips. The thing is, no one buys individual chips like that anymore in today&#8217;s market. Companies call up someone like Qualcomm and buy their Snapdragon product which integrates a CPU, GPU, Bluetooth, WiFi, GPS, 2G, 3G, and even 4G LTE. <a href="http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9227658/Samsung_buys_Swedish_wireless_chip_company_Nanoradio">Samsung also bought Nanoradio</a> quite recently; barely six weeks ago. They&#8217;re similar to CSR, meaning they&#8217;ve specialized in making single purposes chips. Their focus was on ultra low power WiFi.</p>
<p>So now the big question: What&#8217;s Samsung going to do with these companies? CSR&#8217;s CEO, Joep van Beurden, <a href="http://uk.reuters.com/article/2012/07/17/us-samsung-csr-idUKBRE86G06K20120717">said this to <em>Reuters</em></a> earlier today:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;There is a big war going on between the giants of the semiconductor industry like Qualcomm, Intel and Samsung LSI to deliver the complete solution into smartphones. Our team and technology &#8211; location and connectivity &#8211; is in its own right an extremely important part of that platform, but it is even more important if it completes your product offering and that is exactly what Samsung is doing.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>There you have it. Samsung wants to be able to go to their competitors in the handset business, companies like Apple, HTC, even Nokia, and be able to offer them an integrated solution that will allow them to build a phone in no time. Right now it&#8217;s fair to say that the market for these highly integrated chips is dominated by Qualcomm. Most, if not all, of the 4G LTE smartphones sold in the United States use chips that were designed by them.</p>
<p>Samsung obviously wants to enter this space since smartphones have recently begun to outsell personal computers, despite smarpthone penetration being quite low when you look at it from a global perspective.</p>
<p>Translation: Huge market oppertunity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intomobile.com/2012/07/17/first-nanoradio-now-csr-exactly-samsung-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AT&amp;T is likely going to charge iPhone users to FaceTime over cellular</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2012/07/17/att-likely-going-charge-iphone-users-facetime-over-cellular/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intomobile.com/2012/07/17/att-likely-going-charge-iphone-users-facetime-over-cellular/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2012 10:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stefan Constantinescu</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AT&T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iOS / iPhone OS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rumors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/?p=358165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to a screenshot that was discovered by 9to5Mac, it looks like the ability to have a FaceTime call over a cellular connection, a feature that&#8217;s standard in iOS 6, is going to be switched off by AT&#038;T. They&#8217;re either going to disable the feature completely or find some way to nickel and dime you to death to use it. If Steve Jobs were alive, would this have happened? That&#8217;s a stupid question, and it was kind of sort of supposed to be a joke, but think about it for <span style="white-space:nowrap">... <a href="http://www.intomobile.com/2012/07/17/att-likely-going-charge-iphone-users-facetime-over-cellular/">Read more</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to a <a href="http://9to5mac.com/2012/07/16/att-appears-set-to-control-and-charge-for-facetime-over-cellular-in-ios-6/">screenshot that was discovered by <em>9to5Mac</em></a>, it looks like the ability to have a FaceTime call over a cellular connection, a feature that&#8217;s standard in iOS 6, is going to be switched off by AT&#038;T. They&#8217;re either going to disable the feature completely or find some way to nickel and dime you to death to use it. If Steve Jobs were alive, would this have happened? That&#8217;s a stupid question, and it was kind of sort of supposed to be a joke, but think about it for a second. AT&#038;T sold 5.5 million smartphones during Q1 2012. Know how many of those were iPhones? <a href="http://thenextweb.com/apple/2012/04/24/att-activates-4-3-million-iphones-in-q1-as-churn-hits-its-lowest-level-in-five-quarters/">4.3 million</a>. Who do you think is wearing the pants in this relationship? Why didn&#8217;t Apple put their foot down and tell AT&#038;T to simply cut the bullshit? Then again, tethering does cost extra on Verizon, so maybe Apple just recognizes that in order to sell phones in the United States they&#8217;re going to have to play the rules.</p>
<p><center><img src="http://images.intomobile.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/facetimecell.jpg"></center></p>
<p>If you live in Europe or Asia, chances are that you&#8217;re not going to deal with this &#8220;issue&#8221;. Why? Because European operators have figured out that it&#8217;s better to invest in network quality and customer service than tinkering with the user experience of the devices they sell. Sure, there may be a few exceptions in the UK, but go to Spain, Italy, or Germany and you&#8217;re going to have a hard time finding a device that has an operator logo etched on it. Anyway, back to the news at hand. AT&#038;T told <em>9to5Mac</em> that:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;We&#8217;re working closely with Apple on the new developer build of iOS6 and we&#8217;ll share more information with our customers as it becomes available.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Translation: We&#8217;re about to experience a shit storm, so let&#8217;s brace ourselves, find a way to explain why we&#8217;ve come to the discussion we have, and we should prepare to change our stance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intomobile.com/2012/07/17/att-likely-going-charge-iphone-users-facetime-over-cellular/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IDC: &#8220;Samsung is expected to be the smartphone hero in the second quarter.&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2012/07/17/idc-samsung-expected-smartphone-hero-second-quarter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intomobile.com/2012/07/17/idc-samsung-expected-smartphone-hero-second-quarter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2012 09:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stefan Constantinescu</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/?p=358105</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The end of July is quickly approaching, and that means one thing: Companies are soon going to begin reporting their Q2 2012 financial results. Nokia is due to publish their numbers on Thursday, the 19th; Apple&#8217;s turn is next Tuesday, the 24th; and as for Samsung, they&#8217;re booked for next Friday, the 27th. According to analysts polled by Retuers, Samsung is expected to have sold over 50 million smartphones during the quarter; Apple is expected to have shipped 30.5 million iPhones, and as for Nokia &#8230; let&#8217;s not go there. <span style="white-space:nowrap">... <a href="http://www.intomobile.com/2012/07/17/idc-samsung-expected-smartphone-hero-second-quarter/">Read more</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The end of July is quickly approaching, and that means one thing: Companies are soon going to begin reporting their Q2 2012 financial results. Nokia is due to publish their numbers on Thursday, the 19th; Apple&#8217;s turn is next Tuesday, the 24th; and as for Samsung, they&#8217;re booked for next Friday, the 27th. According to analysts polled by <em><a href="http://in.reuters.com/article/2012/07/16/idINL6E8IG0FK20120716">Retuers</a></em>, Samsung is expected to have sold over 50 million smartphones during the quarter; Apple is expected to have shipped 30.5 million iPhones, and as for Nokia &#8230; let&#8217;s not go there. Anyway, to quote IDC analyst Francisco Jeronimo: &#8220;Samsung is expected to be the smartphone hero in the second quarter.&#8221;</p>
<p>Now we&#8217;d like to remind you that <a href="http://9to5mac.com/2011/07/29/samsung-stops-reporting-phone-and-tablet-sales-data-due-to-competitive-and-legal-pressure-from-apple/">Samsung stopped posting sales volumes during the same quarter last year</a>. What does that mean? They no longer say how many phones they shipped. Sure, they&#8217;ll tell you that their flagship device hit X milestone, and that the Galaxy Note has achieved Y sales, but as for the mobile phone division as a whole? Forget about. The same can be said about HTC. Not to worry though, Apple reports how many iPhones they sell, though they don&#8217;t break things down by model. And as for Nokia, they&#8217;re great. They report volumes for feature phones versus smartphones, and they&#8217;ll even tell you how many devices they sold in Europe versus China versus America, and so on and so forth.</p>
<p>Next month, in August, you&#8217;re going to see the heavy weight analyst firms compile reports that say which smartphone platform is leading, which company is dominating in terms of profit share, and so and so forth. Usually we quote the big three: Gartner, IDC, and Strategy Analytics. There are some smaller boutique firms out there, but they haven&#8217;t been around as long. Plus people think Gartner&#8217;s numbers were delivered straight from god, which is pretty hysterical because their forecasts are laughable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intomobile.com/2012/07/17/idc-samsung-expected-smartphone-hero-second-quarter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ZTE profits for 1H2012 expected to be 60% to 80% lower; 12,000 jobs at risk</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2012/07/17/zte-profits-1h2012-expected-60-80-lower-12000-jobs-risk/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intomobile.com/2012/07/17/zte-profits-1h2012-expected-60-80-lower-12000-jobs-risk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2012 08:23:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stefan Constantinescu</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZTE]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/?p=358093</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ZTE, who many people know because of their cheap Android handsets, is also in the business of providing infrastructure equipment to operators. According to Mobile Business Briefing, the company has issued a warning that profits for the first half of 2012 are going to be between 60% and 80% lower than profits during the same time last year. How low is low? We&#8217;re looking at $24 million here, which is barely break even. Rumors are now floating around that the company intends to cut around 12,000 jobs, many of which <span style="white-space:nowrap">... <a href="http://www.intomobile.com/2012/07/17/zte-profits-1h2012-expected-60-80-lower-12000-jobs-risk/">Read more</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ZTE, who many people know because of their cheap Android handsets, is also in the business of providing infrastructure equipment to operators. According to <em><a href="http://www.mobilebusinessbriefing.com/articles/zte-warns-of-steep-profit-drop-12-000-job-cuts-rumoured/24593?elq=3e622afad44e4dfbb89d2d6fb9c61d52">Mobile Business Briefing</a></em>, the company has issued a warning that profits for the first half of 2012 are going to be between 60% and 80% lower than profits during the same time last year. How low is low? We&#8217;re looking at $24 million here, which is barely break even. Rumors are now floating around that the company intends to cut around 12,000 jobs, many of which are outside of China.</p>
<p>So why is ZTE in such bad shape? The report suggests that the current economic situation in Europe is partially to blame, that and operators in China are delaying rolling out new networks. If you think about it, Nokia is facing the same issues. Quarter after quarter, it&#8217;s the network side of the company, Nokia Siemens Networks, that&#8217;s having trouble with their finacnes. It seems that the only people who can make money off of selling cell towers are Ericsson and Huawei.</p>
<p>Anyway, what does all this mean for you? Probably nothing since chances are you&#8217;re not buying a ZTE smartphone. And as for their networking gear, there&#8217;s a high probability that if you&#8217;re reading this you&#8217;re either in Europe or the United States. Those countries mainly rely on equipment from Ericsson, Alcatel-Lucent, and Nokia Siemens Networks. So again, you&#8217;re not going to be impacted.</p>
<p>And as for the 12,000 people who are going to lose their job &#8230; there&#8217;s something to be said about the fact that many of them are based outside of China. That means ZTE wants to focus on their home market, which by the way <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/11/23/china_overtakes_us_biggest_smartphone/">became the largest smartphone market late last year</a>. Maybe repositioning the company to target their home market will prove to be a good idea in the long term?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intomobile.com/2012/07/17/zte-profits-1h2012-expected-60-80-lower-12000-jobs-risk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WSJ: Next iPhone to have a thinner screen thanks to in-cell technology</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2012/07/17/wsj-next-iphone-have-thinner-screen-thanks-incell-technology/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intomobile.com/2012/07/17/wsj-next-iphone-have-thinner-screen-thanks-incell-technology/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2012 07:44:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stefan Constantinescu</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rumors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/?p=358073</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple is going to ship a new iPhone this year and it&#8217;s going to run iOS 6. That&#8217;s pretty much all we know with 100% certainty. How large will the screen be? What chip will it have inside? Will it support NFC? Will it support 4G LTE? Will the back of the device still be as fragile as the back of the iPhone 4 and iPhone 4S? Those questions are going to be answered in late September or early October when Tim Cook gets up on stage and starts his <span style="white-space:nowrap">... <a href="http://www.intomobile.com/2012/07/17/wsj-next-iphone-have-thinner-screen-thanks-incell-technology/">Read more</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple is going to ship a new iPhone this year and it&#8217;s going to run iOS 6. That&#8217;s pretty much all we know with 100% certainty. How large will the screen be? What chip will it have inside? Will it support NFC? Will it support 4G LTE? Will the back of the device still be as fragile as the back of the iPhone 4 and iPhone 4S? Those questions are going to be answered in late September or early October when Tim Cook gets up on stage and starts his 90 minute presentation that&#8217;s going to be live blogged by hundreds of journalists, each banging away on what&#8217;s likely a MacBook Air. Anyway, today&#8217;s news about the next iPhone comes courtesy of <em><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303754904577532121136436182.html">The Wall Street Journal</a></em>. They say that the next iPhone will have a thinner screen because it uses something called &#8220;in-cell&#8221; technology. Apple will probably rebrand &#8220;in-cell&#8221; and call it &#8220;Magic Good Touch&#8221; or something to that effect.</p>
<p><center><iframe width="610" height="343" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/pB0CQOGJcHg?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></center></p>
<p>So what the hell is &#8220;in-cell&#8221; all about? Instead of making a screen touch enabled by putting a capacitive layer on top of a display layer, with &#8220;in-cell&#8221; you basically integrate the capacitive layer into the actual display itself. Now this isn&#8217;t anything new. Samsung was the first to do this when they introduced the original Galaxy S in early 2010. Their fancy pants name for &#8220;in-cell&#8221; is &#8220;Super AMOLED&#8221;. One year later Samsung introduced &#8220;Super AMOLED Plus&#8221; with the Galaxy S II, which is basically the same thing, but minus the PenTile subpixel configuration. And what about this year, what screen technology did Samsung introduce for 2012? That&#8217;s an easy one, just look at the Samsung Galaxy S III, which has a &#8220;Super AMOLED HD&#8221; display. Any guesses as to what Samsung is going to introduce in 2013? Probably something called &#8220;Super AMOLED HD Plus&#8221;.</p>
<p>Anyway, millions of words will be written about the next iPhone. Just you wait.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intomobile.com/2012/07/17/wsj-next-iphone-have-thinner-screen-thanks-incell-technology/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching using memcached
Object Caching 1207/1306 objects using memcached

 Served from: www.intomobile.com @ 2013-05-22 17:45:23 by W3 Total Cache -->