<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>IntoMobile &#187; Government</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.intomobile.com/category/government/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.intomobile.com</link>
	<description>IntoMobile delivers breaking news, information, and analysis on the latest cell phones and cell phone technology.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 00:49:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Apple Vs. Samsung: Apple Says Google Now Violates Siri Patents</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2013/05/22/apple-v-samsung-apple-says-google-now-violates-siri-patents/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intomobile.com/2013/05/22/apple-v-samsung-apple-says-google-now-violates-siri-patents/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 23:36:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ian Kersey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iOS / iPhone OS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/?p=427203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple has been mum about any new product developments over the last few months, but the company is certainly not rolling over to the likes of Samsung in its ongoing patent infringement battle. Interestingly, Apple is now claiming that Samsung is violating Siri patents, via an amendment in its current court case. Apple is claiming that Samsung is infringing on patents 8,086,604 and 6,846,959, which detail a &#8220;universal interface for retrieval of information in a computer system,&#8221; a.k.a. Siri, by using Google&#8217;s Google Now technology in their devices. Apple is also claiming <span style="white-space:nowrap">... <a href="http://www.intomobile.com/2013/05/22/apple-v-samsung-apple-says-google-now-violates-siri-patents/">Read more</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple has been mum about any new product developments over the last few months, but the company is certainly not rolling over to the likes of Samsung in its <a href="http://www.intomobile.com/2013/04/05/itc-judge-rules-samsung-infringes-apples-text-selection-patent/">ongoing patent infringement battle</a>. Interestingly, Apple is now claiming that Samsung is violating Siri patents, via an amendment in its current court case. Apple is claiming that Samsung is infringing on patents 8,086,604 and 6,846,959, which detail a &#8220;universal interface for retrieval of information in a computer system,&#8221; a.k.a. Siri, by using Google&#8217;s Google Now technology in their devices. Apple is also claiming that the <a href="http://www.intomobile.com/reviews/samsung-galaxy-s4-review/">Samsung Galaxy S4</a> is infringing on five more patents, which follow below:</p>
<ul>
<li>U.S. Patent No. 8,086,604 and U.S. Patent No. 6,847,959 on a &#8220;universal interface for retrieval of information in a computer system&#8221;</li>
<li>Apple asserted the &#8217;604 patent in a preliminary injunction motion. The Federal Circuit reversed a preliminary injunction against the Galaxy Nexus and, in addition to equitable reasons, overturned Judge Koh&#8217;s claim construction in a way that affects both &#8220;Siri&#8221; patents alike (for an excellent explanation of this claim construction issue, see Patently-O&#8217;s post). Apple claims that the &#8217;604 and &#8217;959 patents are infringed even under the appeals court&#8217;s construction.</li>
<li>U.S. Patent No. 5,666,502 on a &#8220;graphical user interface using historical lists with field classes&#8221;</li>
<li>U.S. Patent No. 5,946,647 on a &#8220;system and method for performing an action on a structure in computer-generated data&#8221; (which I dubbed the &#8220;data tapping&#8221; patent, a term many reporters have since adopted)</li>
<li>Apple prevailed over HTC on this patent at the ITC. Apple claims that Android infringes this patent at the operating system level (the &#8220;linkify&#8221; library), as you can see in this infringement claim chart from the HTC case. Apple was enforcing an ITC import ban against HTC but ceased enforcement after a settlement (the parties stipulated to rescission of the exclusion order).</li>
<li>U.S. Patent No. 7,761,414 on &#8220;asynchronous data synchronization amongst devices&#8221;</li>
</ul>
<p>Interestingly enough, Apple has not yet mentioned the recently announced <a href="http://www.intomobile.com/2013/05/15/google-io-2013-google-unveils-developer-edition-samsung-galaxy-s4/">Samsung Galaxy S4 Google Editio</a>n in its claims, and it would not be surprising if they did in the future. How the battle turns out is now in the hands of the courts.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-427253" title="Screenshot_2013-05-22-16-30-55 (1)" src="http://images.intomobile.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Screenshot_2013-05-22-16-30-55-1-343x610.png" alt="" width="343" height="610" /></p>
<p>[Via: <a href="http://www.droid-life.com/2013/05/22/apple-sets-eyes-on-galaxy-s4-and-google-now-in-newest-patent-infringements-claim/">Droid Life</a> , <a href="http://www.fosspatents.com/2013/05/apple-identifies-certain-patents.html">FOSS Patents</a>] [Image: <a href="http://www.technobuffalo.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/apple-vs-samsung-rock-em-sock-em-robots.jpg">Techno Buffalo</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intomobile.com/2013/05/22/apple-v-samsung-apple-says-google-now-violates-siri-patents/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iOS 6 gets green light from the US Defense Department</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2013/05/17/ios-6-gets-green-light-us-defense-department/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intomobile.com/2013/05/17/ios-6-gets-green-light-us-defense-department/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 18:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charles West</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iOS / iPhone OS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/?p=425877</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good news for Apple as the company’s iOS 6 software just received clearance from the United States Defense Department. This undoubtedly sets the stage for the iPhone and iPad to become standard commonplace in the hands of workers in the Pentagon.  This comes to no ones surprise, considering how the approval of the DoD has been rumored for some time now. Apple’s iOS 6 joins Samsung running the Knox security suite and BlackBerry 10 devices. The government looks to be just about done with those obsolete BlackBerry 7 handsets that’s <span style="white-space:nowrap">... <a href="http://www.intomobile.com/2013/05/17/ios-6-gets-green-light-us-defense-department/">Read more</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p dir="ltr">Good news for <a href="http://www.intomobile.com/companies/apple/">Apple</a> as the company’s iOS 6 software just received clearance from the United States Defense Department. This undoubtedly sets the stage for the iPhone and iPad to become standard commonplace in the hands of workers in the Pentagon.  This comes to no ones surprise, considering how the approval of the DoD has been rumored for some time now. Apple’s iOS 6 joins Samsung running the Knox security suite and BlackBerry 10 devices.</p>
<p dir="ltr">The government looks to be just about done with those obsolete BlackBerry 7 handsets that’s grown synonymous with the image of public figures. Now if only stock Android could join the party.</p>
<p>[<a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-05-17/apple-mobile-devices-approved-for-use-on-u-s-military-networks.html">Bloomberg</a>; via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2013/05/17/ios-6-approved-for-use-on-american-military-networks/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=feedly">engadget</a>]</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intomobile.com/2013/05/17/ios-6-gets-green-light-us-defense-department/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cops to Apple: Help! We Can&#8217;t Decrypt iPhones!</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2013/05/10/cops-apple-help-we-cant-decrypt-iphones/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intomobile.com/2013/05/10/cops-apple-help-we-cant-decrypt-iphones/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 21:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ian Kersey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iOS / iPhone OS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/?p=423977</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sometimes, even the cops need a helping hand. According to reports from CNET, law enforcement officials across the country are having a hard time extracting data from iPhones that have been seized as evidence in investigations. Apple has been receiving requests from law enforcement officials to decrypt iPhones, and the list is long. Like seven weeks long. Even the ATF is having trouble, with CNET&#8217;s report saying that an ATF agent spent three months last summer trying to find a local, state or federal law enforcement agency with the skills <span style="white-space:nowrap">... <a href="http://www.intomobile.com/2013/05/10/cops-apple-help-we-cant-decrypt-iphones/">Read more</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes, even the cops need a helping hand. According to reports from <em>CNET</em>, law enforcement officials across the country are having a hard time extracting data from iPhones that have been seized as evidence in investigations. Apple has been receiving requests from law enforcement officials to decrypt iPhones, and the list is long. Like seven weeks long.</p>
<p>Even the ATF is having trouble, with CNET&#8217;s report saying that an ATF agent spent three months last summer trying to find a local, state or federal law enforcement agency with the skills needed to decrypt an iPhone 4S before calling on Apple.</p>
<p>Brute force password attacks are possible on iPhones, and can be cracked fairly easily if the pin is only four or five digits. Passwords that are nine or ten digits long however can take years to crack. Apple has the ability to crack passwords with ease, a method that the Cupertino company is keeping close to their chests.</p>
<p>Unlocking mobile phones by law enforcement is increasing in popularity, and raises privacy concerns. If done without a warrant, the process raises Fourth Amendment concerns.</p>
<p>Google has a process for helping law enforcement crack Android devices, by resetting the password of the device and then handing it over to authorities. If this process is initiated, Google also notifies the user that their device has been compromised.</p>
<p>[Via: <a href="http://gizmodo.com/apples-got-a-huge-waiting-list-of-cops-who-need-iphone-500136154">Gizmodo</a> , <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-57583843-38/apple-deluged-by-police-demands-to-decrypt-iphones/">CNET</a>] [Image: <a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/07/its-legal-cops-seize-cell-phone-impersonate-owner/">ArsTechnica</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intomobile.com/2013/05/10/cops-apple-help-we-cant-decrypt-iphones/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SFPD Uses Undercover Cops Selling iPhones on the Street in Attempt to Curb Smartphone Thefts</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2013/04/29/sfpd-uses-undercover-cops-selling-iphones-street-attempt-curb-smartphone-thefts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intomobile.com/2013/04/29/sfpd-uses-undercover-cops-selling-iphones-street-attempt-curb-smartphone-thefts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 17:27:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ian Kersey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BlackBerry OS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iOS / iPhone OS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Phone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/?p=420889</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In an attempt to curb stolen smartphone sales, San Francisco police officers are using a tactic that they hope will shock and awe those who buy stolen iPhones out of doing so. The SFPD is sending out plainclothes officers to some of the rougher areas of SF, offering &#8220;stolen&#8221; iPhones to unwitting civilians. When someone shows interest in purchasing the device, the cops make an arrest. According to SFPD, half of all thefts in the city by the bay involve stolen smartphones, with women being the targets of most robberies. <span style="white-space:nowrap">... <a href="http://www.intomobile.com/2013/04/29/sfpd-uses-undercover-cops-selling-iphones-street-attempt-curb-smartphone-thefts/">Read more</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In an attempt to curb stolen smartphone sales, San Francisco police officers are using a tactic that they hope will shock and awe those who buy stolen iPhones out of doing so. The SFPD is sending out plainclothes officers to some of the rougher areas of SF, offering &#8220;stolen&#8221; iPhones to unwitting civilians. When someone shows interest in purchasing the device, the cops make an arrest.</p>
<p>According to SFPD, half of all thefts in the city by the bay involve stolen smartphones, with women being the targets of most robberies. The SFPD are picking some of the most notoriously shady places in SF, such as 7th and Market streets, where selling of stolen smartphones and other items regularly take place.</p>
<p>In order for the SFPD to be able to make arrests, the police need the prospective buyer to name a price for the item. Undercover cops will approach prospective buyers, clearly state that the item is stolen than ask for the customer to make an offer. Only at that point can SFPD make an arrest.</p>
<p>Whether or not this approach will actually curb stolen smartphone sales is to be determined, but one thing&#8217;s for sure; if the deal seems too good to be true, it probably is. And taking it just may land you in jail or with a nice fat fine. <span style="font-size: 13px; line-height: 19px;">What are your thoughts on the SFPD&#8217;s strategy? </span></p>
<p>[Via: <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5995493/undercover-cops-are-selling-iphones-on-the-street-to-get-people-to-stop-buying-stolen-iphones">Gizmodo</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intomobile.com/2013/04/29/sfpd-uses-undercover-cops-selling-iphones-street-attempt-curb-smartphone-thefts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ITC shoots down Google&#8217;s infringement suit against the iPhone</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2013/04/23/itc-shoots-down-googles-infringement-suit-against-iphone/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intomobile.com/2013/04/23/itc-shoots-down-googles-infringement-suit-against-iphone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 15:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charles West</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iOS / iPhone OS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/?p=419283</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The battle between Apple and Google seems to be coming to a bit of a slowdown, thanks to the ruling of an ITC judge. The United States International Trade Commission ruled that Apple’s iPhone does not infringe on technology Google gained when it acquired Motorola Mobility in 2011. This whole thing started over the search giant trying to get an import ban on all iPhone 4’s for using Motorola’s technology. However judges seen it another way, by deciding to rule that the proximity sensor patent Motorola was asserting is invalid. <span style="white-space:nowrap">... <a href="http://www.intomobile.com/2013/04/23/itc-shoots-down-googles-infringement-suit-against-iphone/">Read more</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p dir="ltr">The battle between <a href="http://www.intomobile.com/companies/apple/">Apple</a> and Google seems to be coming to a bit of a slowdown, thanks to the ruling of an ITC judge. The United States International Trade Commission ruled that Apple’s iPhone does not infringe on technology Google gained when it acquired Motorola Mobility in 2011. This whole thing started over the search giant trying to get an import ban on all iPhone 4’s for using Motorola’s technology.</p>
<p dir="ltr">However judges seen it another way, by deciding to rule that the proximity sensor patent Motorola was asserting is invalid. After the court&#8217;s decision was laid out, a Google spokesperson said that the company was “disappointed with this outcome and are evaluating our options.”</p>
<p dir="ltr">So this means back to the drawing board for Google. The company’s acquisition of <a href="http://www.intomobile.com/companies/motorola/">Motorola</a> is puzzling because it hasn&#8217;t brought any real results to these legal squabbles with Apple. Google still seems vulnerable to patent trolling, and buying Motorola was supposed to be this maximum chip for defending itself. None of Google’s infringement cases against Apple seem effective. The only effect these patent cases have had is the wasting of time and resources.</p>
<p dir="ltr">Everyone should just kiss and makeup, and just license with one another already.</p>
<p>[via <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/04/23/us-apple-google-patent-idUSBRE93L17Y20130423">Reuters</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intomobile.com/2013/04/23/itc-shoots-down-googles-infringement-suit-against-iphone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boston Bombing Suspects: Chechen President Denies Affiliation via Instagram</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2013/04/19/boston-bombing-suspects-chechen-president-denies-affiliation-via-instagram/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intomobile.com/2013/04/19/boston-bombing-suspects-chechen-president-denies-affiliation-via-instagram/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 18:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ian Kersey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Breaking News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Networking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/?p=418453</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many of us awoke today to startling developments about the recent Boston Marathon bombing. The two suspects in the case have Chechen roots, and the President of the Chechen Republic Ramzan Kadyrov took to Instagram, one of his favorite mediums, to belay any rumors of the suspected bombers having any connection with the Chechen government. Kadyrov had this to say (translated from Russian via Google Translate): &#8220;Any attempt to make the connection between Chechnya and Tsarnaevymi if they are guilty, in vain,&#8221; &#8220;They grew up in the United States, their <span style="white-space:nowrap">... <a href="http://www.intomobile.com/2013/04/19/boston-bombing-suspects-chechen-president-denies-affiliation-via-instagram/">Read more</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many of us awoke today to startling developments about the recent Boston Marathon bombing. The two suspects in the case have Chechen roots, and the President of the Chechen Republic Ramzan Kadyrov took to Instagram, one of his favorite mediums, to belay any rumors of the suspected bombers having any connection with the Chechen government. Kadyrov had this to say (translated from Russian via Google Translate):</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Any attempt to make the connection between Chechnya and Tsarnaevymi if they are guilty, in vain,&#8221; &#8220;They grew up in the United States, their attitudes and beliefs were formed there. It is necessary to seek the roots of evil in America.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>The FBI identified two brothers as suspected bombers in the Boston Marathon attack that left two dead and dozens injured. The two brothers Tamerlan Tsarnaev and Dzhokar Tsarnaev have Chechen roots, and some reports are claiming that the brothers lived in Chechnya for some time. The brothers had spent some time in the U.S., with the younger brother Dzhokhar graduating from public high school in Cambridge in 2011. Whether the brothers had connections to Chechen groups has yet to be determined.</p>
<p>Kadyrov has been using Instagram since April 2013 and uses it to comment on current events and post updates about his activities, and has over 116,000 followers.</p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px; line-height: 19px;">Kadyrov&#8217;s full statement, as translated by Google Translate, below:</span></p>
<blockquote><p>The tragic events took place in Boston. The blast killed people. We have previously expressed their condolences to the people of the city and the people of America. Today, as reported by the media, while trying to arrest a Tsarnaea was killed. It would be logical if he was detained and investigated, found all the circumstances and the degree of his guilt. Apparently, the special services needed by all means to calm the result of society. Any attempt to make the connection between Chechnya and Tsarnaevymi if they are guilty, in vain. They grew up in the United States, their attitudes and beliefs were formed there. It is necessary to seek the roots of evil in America. From terrorism to fight the whole world. We know better than anyone else. We wish recovery to all the victims and share the feelings of sorrow Americans. # # Boston # bombing investig</p></blockquote>
<p>[Via: <a href="http://mashable.com/2013/04/19/chechen-leader-denies-boston-connection/">Mashable</a>] [Image: <a href="http://mashable.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/chechnya-instagram.png">@kadyrov_95</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intomobile.com/2013/04/19/boston-bombing-suspects-chechen-president-denies-affiliation-via-instagram/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ACLU Asks FTC to Investigate Carriers Over Security Risks, Delayed Android Updates</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2013/04/17/aclu-asks-ftc-investigate-carriers-over-security-risks-due-lack-updates/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intomobile.com/2013/04/17/aclu-asks-ftc-investigate-carriers-over-security-risks-due-lack-updates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 22:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wade Keye</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AT&T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sprint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T-Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verizon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virgin Mobile]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/?p=417879</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) issued a formal complaint to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) on Wednesday. In it they contend that Mobile Carriers are creating security risks for their customers by not releasing updates in a timely manner. As anyone still suffering with an ancient version of Android can tell you, carriers can take their time to push new Android updates even when the manufacturer has completed it, and there&#8217;s a point where a phone model will be completely left behind, often long before the end of its contract. <span style="white-space:nowrap">... <a href="http://www.intomobile.com/2013/04/17/aclu-asks-ftc-investigate-carriers-over-security-risks-due-lack-updates/">Read more</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) issued a formal <a href="http://www.wired.com/images_blogs/threatlevel/2013/04/aclu_-_android_ftc_complaint_-_final.pdf" target="_blank">complaint</a> to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) on Wednesday. In it they contend that Mobile Carriers are creating security risks for their customers by not releasing updates in a timely manner. As anyone still suffering with an ancient version of Android can tell you, carriers can take their time to push new <a href="http://www.intomobile.com/category/platforms/android/" target="_blank">Android</a> updates even when the manufacturer has completed it, and there&#8217;s a point where a phone model will be completely left behind, often long before the end of its contract.</p>
<blockquote><p>“A significant number of consumers are using smartphones running a version of the Android operating system with known, exploitable security vulnerabilities for which fixes have been published by Google, but have not been distributed to consumers’ smartphones by the wireless carriers and their handset manufacturer partners,” the text of the complaint states, “There are millions of vulnerable Android phones in the hands of consumers today because wireless phone carriers and phone hardware makers refuse to transmit existing software security fixes to phones in a timely manner, according to a security researcher.”</p></blockquote>
<p>The security concerns are absolutely real and an increasing concern for Android users. But I have to say anything that forces carriers to get out the updates in a more timely manner is great news for all customers since so many folks are still running outdated versions of the OS. Gingerbread is still on a majority of devices and it&#8217;s two years old!</p>
<p>The ACLU complaint ends with a &#8220;Request for Relief&#8221; that outlines the way it feels carriers should address the alleged grievance. Whatever comes of this, hopefully it will lead to faster updates for everyone!</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;REQUEST FOR RELIEF<br />
The ACLU requests that the Commission investigate the major wireless carriers and enjoin<br />
their unfair and deceptive business practices. Specifically, the ACLU requests that the<br />
Commission:<br />
A. Compel the major wireless carriers to warn all subscribers using carrier-supplied<br />
Android smartphones with known, unpatched security vulnerabilities about the<br />
existence and severity the vulnerabilities, as well as any reasonable steps those<br />
consumers can take to protect themselves, including purchasing a different<br />
smartphone.<br />
B. Compel the major wireless carriers to permit consumers under contract who are<br />
using carrier-supplied Android smartphones which have not received prompt,<br />
regular security updates to end their contracts early, without any early termination<br />
fee.<br />
C. Compel the wireless carriers to permit consumers who are using carrier-supplied<br />
Android smartphones less than two years old which have not received prompt,<br />
regular security updates to either:<br />
1. Exchange, at no cost, their existing device for another phone that will<br />
receive prompt, regular updates directly from Apple, Google, Microsoft or<br />
another mobile operating system vendor.<br />
2. Return the phone and receive a full refund of the original purchase price&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>[Via: <a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2013/04/aclu-android-security-issue/" target="_blank">Wired</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intomobile.com/2013/04/17/aclu-asks-ftc-investigate-carriers-over-security-risks-due-lack-updates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>White House Threatens Veto of CISPA in Memo</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2013/04/16/white-house-threatens-veto-cispa-memo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intomobile.com/2013/04/16/white-house-threatens-veto-cispa-memo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 21:21:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wade Keye</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Breaking News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/?p=417349</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a memo issued today, the White House stated its opposition to the Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act (CISPA), at least in its current form.  Stating privacy concerns, the memo made it clear that President Obama would veto the bill as it stands now. &#8220;Citizens have a right to know that corporations will be held accountable – and not granted immunity – for failing to safeguard personal information adequately,&#8221; the memo states. &#8220;Moreover, the Administration is confident that such measures can be crafted in a way that is not overly onerous or <span style="white-space:nowrap">... <a href="http://www.intomobile.com/2013/04/16/white-house-threatens-veto-cispa-memo/">Read more</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a memo issued today, the White House stated its opposition to the Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act (CISPA), at least in its current form.  Stating privacy concerns, the memo made it clear that President Obama would veto the bill as it stands now.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Citizens have a right to know that corporations will be held accountable – and not granted immunity – for failing to safeguard personal information adequately,&#8221; the memo states. &#8220;Moreover, the Administration is confident that such measures can be crafted in a way that is not overly onerous or cost prohibitive on the businesses sending the information.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>CISPA is reportedly up for a vote on the floor of the United States House this week, possibly as soon as tomorrow (Weds.).  The bill&#8217;s stated goal is to help the U.S government investigate cyber threats and ensure the security of networks against cyberattack.  To this end, CISPA would allow for the sharing of Internet traffic information between the U.S. government and certain technology and manufacturing companies.</p>
<p>But privacy activists such the <a href="https://www.eff.org/">Electronic Frontier Foundation</a> have criticized the bill for having weak limits on how and when the government may monitor an individual’s Internet browsing information, and they fear that such new powers could be used to spy on the general public rather than to pursue hackers or cyber terrorists.</p>
<p>Apparently the Obama administration agrees with their fears, at least to an extent.  The memo is very clear that the White House wants change to CISPA, not do away with the bill and they &#8221;stands ready&#8221; to work with the House Intelligence Committee and other lawmakers to &#8220;incorporate our core priorities&#8221; into the final bill.</p>
<p>Congressman Mike Rogers (R-Mich.) of the House Intelligence Committee  disagreed with the President saying, &#8220;You can&#8217;t get more oversight on making sure that people&#8217;s personally identifiable information is protected than the way we structured it in this bill.&#8221;</p>
<p>[Via:<a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-valley/technology/294247-white-house-issues-veto-threat-against-cispa-citing-privacy-concerns"> TheHill.com</a>]</p>
<p>[Image: <a href="http://www.etsy.com/shop/sharpwriter?ref=pr_shop_more">Jason Heuser</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intomobile.com/2013/04/16/white-house-threatens-veto-cispa-memo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FCC to look into cell phone unlocking ban</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2013/03/01/fcc-investigate-cell-phone-unlocking-ban/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intomobile.com/2013/03/01/fcc-investigate-cell-phone-unlocking-ban/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 16:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kelly Hodgkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lifestyle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/?p=406307</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to a report in TechCrunch, the FCC will look into the legality of a law that bans the unlocking of cell phones. The law went into effect this year after the Library of Congress removed the cell phone unlock exemption from the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. The “ban raises competition concerns; it raises innovation concerns,” FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski told TechCrunch during a CrunchGov event. “It’s something that we will look at at the FCC to see if we can and should enable consumers to use unlocked phones.” TechCrunch <span style="white-space:nowrap">... <a href="http://www.intomobile.com/2013/03/01/fcc-investigate-cell-phone-unlocking-ban/">Read more</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to <a href="http://techcrunch.com/2013/02/28/fcc-to-investigate-cell-phone-unlocking-ban/">a report in TechCrunch</a>, the FCC will look into the legality of a law that bans the unlocking of cell phones. The law <a href="http://www.intomobile.com/2013/01/24/jailbreaking/">went into effect this year</a> after the Library of Congress removed the cell phone unlock exemption from the Digital Millennium Copyright Act.</p>
<p>The “ban raises competition concerns; it raises innovation concerns,” FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski told TechCrunch during a CrunchGov event. “It’s something that we will look at at the FCC to see if we can and should enable consumers to use unlocked phones.”</p>
<p>TechCrunch notes that the FCC might not have authority in this area to force any changes in the law, but it&#8217;s encouraging that at least one arm of the government has taken notice of this issue. Hopefully, the <a href="http://www.intomobile.com/2013/02/21/cell-phone-unlocking-petition-close-reaching-its-signature-goal/">successful White House petition</a> that asks the President to consider changing this law will also move us closer to overturning this ban.</p>
<p>[Via  <a href="http://techcrunch.com/2013/02/28/fcc-to-investigate-cell-phone-unlocking-ban/">TechCrunch</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intomobile.com/2013/03/01/fcc-investigate-cell-phone-unlocking-ban/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>North Korea to offer foreign visitors mobile internet, citizens get left out</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2013/02/22/north-korea-offer-foreign-visitors-mobile-internet-citizens-get-left-out/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intomobile.com/2013/02/22/north-korea-offer-foreign-visitors-mobile-internet-citizens-get-left-out/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 16:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charles West</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile Broadband]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/?p=403471</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[North Korea and its partly owned mobile phone provider Koryolink plan to offer mobile internet access at 3G speeds to foreign visitors and residents from abroad. This after the company recently hit a milestone of 1 million mobile phone users in the country. Citizens of North Korea will not be able to use the 3G network for internet as they remain limited to only making phone calls. It was just a month ago when the strict North Korean government started allowing foreign visitors to bring their own mobile devices into <span style="white-space:nowrap">... <a href="http://www.intomobile.com/2013/02/22/north-korea-offer-foreign-visitors-mobile-internet-citizens-get-left-out/">Read more</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>North Korea and its partly owned mobile phone provider Koryolink plan to offer mobile internet access at 3G speeds to foreign visitors and residents from abroad. This after the company recently <a href="http://www.intomobile.com/2012/02/06/north-koreas-reaches-1-million-mobile-phone-users/">hit a milestone of 1 million mobile phone users</a> in the country. Citizens of North Korea will not be able to use the 3G network for internet as they remain limited to only making phone calls.</p>
<p>It was just a month ago when the strict North Korean government started allowing <a href="http://www.intomobile.com/2013/01/26/foreign-visitors-can-now-use-mobile-phones-north-korea/">foreign visitors to bring their own mobile devices into the country</a> with them. Now the country is beginning to ease up a bit.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, North Korean citizens have to suffer through limited internet as a whole, with access to only message boards, chat functions, and state sponsored media. The country’s stubbornness keeps it laughably behind South Korea in the field of technology.</p>
<p>[via <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-21546877">BBC</a>]</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intomobile.com/2013/02/22/north-korea-offer-foreign-visitors-mobile-internet-citizens-get-left-out/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 3/40 queries in 0.029 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 1220/1296 objects using memcached

 Served from: www.intomobile.com @ 2013-05-22 22:52:22 by W3 Total Cache -->