<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>IntoMobile &#187; Hardware</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.intomobile.com/category/hardware/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.intomobile.com</link>
	<description>IntoMobile delivers breaking news, information, and analysis on the latest cell phones and cell phone technology.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:47:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/>		<item>
		<title>Consumers may love the iPhone, but carriers hate it</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2012/02/09/consumers-may-love-iphone-but-carriers-hate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intomobile.com/2012/02/09/consumers-may-love-iphone-but-carriers-hate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>George Tinari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AT&T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Devices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iOS / iPhone OS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sprint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verizon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/?p=312189</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ever wonder why when you walk into a carrier store, they always subtly (or in some cases, not so subtly) try to push you toward buying an Android device? The reason is because even though Apple requires a grandiose display of the iPhone, carriers make much more money off of Android phones. Carriers pay Apple the subsidy that is able to keep the iPhone down to its $199 price point even after cramming in loads of new features in every release. For Apple, this is good. For consumers, this is <span style="white-space:nowrap">... <a href="http://www.intomobile.com/2012/02/09/consumers-may-love-iphone-but-carriers-hate/">Read more</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ever wonder why when you walk into a carrier store, they always subtly (or in some cases, not so subtly) try to push you toward buying an Android device? The reason is because even though Apple requires a grandiose display of the iPhone, carriers make much more money off of Android phones.</p>
<p>Carriers pay Apple the subsidy that is able to keep the iPhone down to its $199 price point even after cramming in loads of new features in every release. For Apple, this is good. For consumers, this is good. For carriers, this is very bad.</p>
<p>During 2009 and 2010 before Verizon Wireless was selling the iPhone, its EBITDA margin was at an average of 46.4 percent. Right after the <a href="http://www.intomobile.com/2011/01/11/verizon-iphone-official/">Verizon iPhone became a reality</a>, the profit margin dropped to 43.7 percent. Last quarter, which was the first quarter to include iPhone 4S sales, Verizon&#8217;s margin was at 42.2 percent.</p>
<p>Fortunately for Verizon, its margins are comparably high to those of AT&amp;T and Sprint. AT&amp;T&#8217;s EBITDA service margin last quarter was 28.7 percent, an 8.9 percent decline year-over-year. Sprint&#8217;s margin last quarter was even worse at a sad 9.5 percent. The year before that when Sprint wasn&#8217;t selling the iPhone, its margin was 16 percent.</p>
<p>The good news is since <a href="http://www.intomobile.com/2012/01/24/apples-q1-2012-earnings-exceed-expectations/">Apple sells so many iPhones</a>, carriers are still making plenty of money off of them. Don&#8217;t ever lose sleep about them not making money &#8212; if something doesn&#8217;t add to their bottom line, you can bet carriers will not go through with it.</p>
<p>[<a href="http://money.cnn.com/2012/02/08/technology/iphone_carrier_subsidy/" target="_blank">via CNN Money</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intomobile.com/2012/02/09/consumers-may-love-iphone-but-carriers-hate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Love your new Android phone? You won&#8217;t for long</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2012/02/09/love-your-new-android-phone-you-wont-long/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intomobile.com/2012/02/09/love-your-new-android-phone-you-wont-long/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>George Tinari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BlackBerry OS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iOS / iPhone OS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DROID]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone 3GS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/?p=312317</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Flash back to 2009: You just bought a brand new Motorola Droid, the first phone to run Android 2.0 and one of the very first Android handsets to successfully compete with the iPhone. Your friend, however, decided to buy a recently released iPhone 3GS. Now jump ahead to the present: You and your friend still own those same phones, but which one out of the two feels like a worthless piece of crap? The Motorola Droid. This is the case with many Android and BlackBerry devices &#8212; they lose their <span style="white-space:nowrap">... <a href="http://www.intomobile.com/2012/02/09/love-your-new-android-phone-you-wont-long/">Read more</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Flash back to 2009: You just bought a brand new Motorola Droid, the first phone to run Android 2.0 and one of the very first Android handsets to successfully compete with the iPhone. Your friend, however, decided to buy a recently released <span class='bm_keywordlink' id='iphone-3gs-span'><a href="http://www.intomobile.com/phones/apple/iphone-3gs/">iPhone 3GS</a></span>. </p>
<p>Now jump ahead to the present: You and your friend still own those same phones, but which one out of the two feels like a worthless piece of crap? The Motorola Droid. This is the case with many Android and BlackBerry devices &#8212; they lose their value after a short period of time &#8212; and a new study from Priceonomics supports this.</p>
<p>Priceonomics studied cell phone resale values after usage for 18 months. It found that after that period of time, iPhones retain 53 percent of their original value. Android phones have only 42 percent of their initial worth and BlackBerrys have 41 percent. This means an 18-month-old iPhone would sell for $312.</p>
<p>Additionally, the total cost of ownership for BlackBerry and Android devices are far higher than that of an iPhone. Apple&#8217;s handset only costs an average of $13.20 per month, while BlackBerry is around $17 per month and Android phones are around $18 per month &#8212; the latter being 40 percent more than the iPhone.</p>
<p>Priceonomics had this to say about the study:</p>
<blockquote><p>At Priceonomics, we firmly believe that resale value is the best objective indicator of product quality. If you wanted to figure out the best cell phone, you could look at all the reviews, test out all the phones, talk to all the experts, but still your assessment will be subjective. Or you could let the market tell you which phones are the highest quality by seeing which ones best retain their value over time.</p></blockquote>
<p>Taking that belief into consideration, it&#8217;s clear the iPhone reigns in terms of overall quality, even in the long run.</p>
<p>[<a href="http://priceonomics.com/phones/#cell-phone-depreciation" target="_blank">via Priceonomics</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intomobile.com/2012/02/09/love-your-new-android-phone-you-wont-long/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Motorola: Hardware causes late Android updates, not custom UIs</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2012/02/09/hardware-causes-late-android-updates-not-custom-uis-motorola-claims/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intomobile.com/2012/02/09/hardware-causes-late-android-updates-not-custom-uis-motorola-claims/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:31:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charles West</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motorola]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/?p=312171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When it comes to explaining the cause of Android fragmentation; we&#8217;ve heard it all &#8230; or so we thought. Recently, Motorola senior vice president Christy Wyatt voiced her thoughts on the company&#8217;s current struggles on delivering new versions of the Android OS to customers, such as Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich. To no one&#8217;s surprise, Wyatt mentioned how time-consuming it is to integrate a new version of Android into Motorola&#8217;s platform. If you read deep into the words: &#8220;integrate&#8221; and &#8220;time-consuming&#8221; you instantly think about a software related issue, right? <span style="white-space:nowrap">... <a href="http://www.intomobile.com/2012/02/09/hardware-causes-late-android-updates-not-custom-uis-motorola-claims/">Read more</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When it comes to explaining the cause of Android fragmentation; we&#8217;ve heard it all &#8230; or so we thought. Recently, Motorola senior vice president Christy Wyatt voiced her thoughts on the company&#8217;s current struggles on delivering new versions of the Android OS to customers, such as Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich. To no one&#8217;s surprise, Wyatt mentioned how time-consuming it is to integrate a new version of Android into Motorola&#8217;s platform.</p>
<p>If you read deep into the words: &#8220;integrate&#8221; and &#8220;time-consuming&#8221; you instantly think about a software related issue, right? Well, not according to Moto&#8217;s SVP. She claims that &#8220;hardware is the long pole in the tent,&#8221; adding that many hardware components found in the company&#8217;s devices need some fine tuning to fuse a new OS. When someone asked her about Motorola&#8217;s custom user interface, MOTOBLUR or whatever it&#8217;s called today, Wyatt responded saying &#8220;the software is never the hard part.&#8221;</p>
<p>She also talked about things we already knew, like Google prioritizing manufacturers who has dibs on the company&#8217;s &#8220;hero&#8221; device (think any Nexus phone), as this gives them access to the new code first. Sorting through all the fluff, I found that the most compelling part of what Wyatt said was carriers have the final say when it comes to updates. Motorola also says the carriers have a large impact on when things happen, or whether they happen at all. Wow.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve said it before, and I&#8217;ll say it again: This ultimately is a Google issue, as it needs grow a pair and put its foot down on some of the behavior from these carriers. Truth is, the search giant has empowered the carriers way too much, giving them the last say so when upgrades go out. It&#8217;s ridiculous that only <a href="http://www.intomobile.com/2012/02/02/fragmentation-still-plagues-android-as-only-1-of-all-devices-carry-ics-4-0/">1 percent of Android user have ICS 4.0</a>, especially since its been out for over two months &#8212; it&#8217;s <em>absurd</em>. Just stating the facts, people.</p>
<p>[via<a href="http://www.mobileburn.com/18499/news/custom-ui-not-the-cause-of-android-os-update-delays-its-the-hardware-says-motorola"> mobileburn</a>]</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intomobile.com/2012/02/09/hardware-causes-late-android-updates-not-custom-uis-motorola-claims/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Halliburton dumps BlackBerry, starts distributing iPhones to workers</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2012/02/08/halliburton-dumps-blackberrys-starts-distributing-iphones-workers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intomobile.com/2012/02/08/halliburton-dumps-blackberrys-starts-distributing-iphones-workers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 22:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>George Tinari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BlackBerry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BlackBerry OS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Devices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enterprise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iOS / iPhone OS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIM (Research in Motion)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/?p=311969</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the world&#8217;s largest oilfield companies, Halliburton, publicly acknowledged its decision to stop giving workers BlackBerrys and start equipping them with iPhones. This is a gigantic blow to Research in Motion because the BlackBerry has for a very long time been widely considered the best phone for enterprise users. Halliburton obviously disagrees and so will many other companies if RIM doesn&#8217;t step its game up in time. Spokesperson for Halliburton, Tara Mullee Agard, said to Reuters in an email, &#8220;We are making this transition in order to better support our <span style="white-space:nowrap">... <a href="http://www.intomobile.com/2012/02/08/halliburton-dumps-blackberrys-starts-distributing-iphones-workers/">Read more</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the world&#8217;s largest oilfield companies, Halliburton, publicly acknowledged its decision to stop giving workers BlackBerrys and start equipping them with iPhones. This is a gigantic blow to Research in Motion because the BlackBerry has for a very long time been widely considered the best phone for enterprise users. Halliburton obviously disagrees and so will many other companies if RIM doesn&#8217;t step its game up in time.</p>
<p>Spokesperson for Halliburton, Tara Mullee Agard, said to <em>Reuters</em> in an email, &#8220;We are making this transition in order to better support our mobile applications initiatives.&#8221; The transition she speaks of is the movement from BlackBerry to iPhone over the next two years for 4,500 employees. She also pointed out Apple is helping the company with the process.</p>
<p>Apple didn&#8217;t just steal a large amount of candy from RIM, it&#8217;s getting the dirty pleasure of chewing slowly right in front of RIM.</p>
<p>BlackBerry advocates, you are now presented with a challenge: come up with a better excuse than &#8220;BlackBerry devices are for business users.&#8221; I&#8217;m afraid that argument is no longer valid. Oh, and since <a href="http://www.intomobile.com/2012/01/22/does-rim-go-now/">BlackBerry isn&#8217;t so hot with consumers either</a>, what exactly is the target market? Please hurry. The <a href="http://gtdaily.net/post/17283133419/the-blackberry-bold-team" target="_blank">BlackBerry Bold Team</a> is waiting for its next mission.</p>
<p>[<a href="http://www.digitaltrends.com/mobile/blackberry-devices-rejected-by-halliburton-in-favor-of-the-iphone/" target="_blank">via Digital Trends</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intomobile.com/2012/02/08/halliburton-dumps-blackberrys-starts-distributing-iphones-workers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Samsung squashes hopes of Galaxy S III debuting at March 22 event</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2012/02/07/samsung-squashes-hopes-galaxy-s-iii-debuting/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intomobile.com/2012/02/07/samsung-squashes-hopes-galaxy-s-iii-debuting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 23:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>George Tinari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Devices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung Galaxy S2]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/?p=311545</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Contrary to the wishful thinking of many, Samsung confirmed it will not introduce the Galaxy S III smartphone at its March 22nd event in France. The vendor announced plans to hold a special event yesterday and it immediately sparked rumors for an unveiling of the Galaxy S II successor. Instead, a spokesperson for Samsung told The Next Web that the event will just be a regular day of talking about the company&#8217;s current line of products. How fun. Last week, Samsung also shot down rumors of a Galaxy S III debut <span style="white-space:nowrap">... <a href="http://www.intomobile.com/2012/02/07/samsung-squashes-hopes-galaxy-s-iii-debuting/">Read more</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Contrary to the wishful thinking of many, Samsung confirmed it will not introduce the <span class='bm_keywordlink' id='galaxy-s-i9000-span'><a href="http://www.intomobile.com/phones/samsung/galaxy-s-i9000/">Galaxy S</a></span> III smartphone at its March 22nd event in France. </p>
<p>The vendor announced plans to hold a special event yesterday and it immediately <a href="http://www.intomobile.com/2012/02/07/samsung-hosting-event-march-22nd-france-well-see-galaxy-s-iii/">sparked rumors for an unveiling of the Galaxy S II successor</a>. Instead, a spokesperson for Samsung told <em>The Next Web</em> that the event will just be a regular day of talking about the company&#8217;s current line of products. How fun.</p>
<p>Last week, Samsung also <a href="http://www.intomobile.com/2012/02/01/breaking-samsung-confirms-no-galaxy-s-iii-mobile-world-congress/">shot down rumors of a Galaxy S III debut at Mobile World Congress 2012</a>, which officially begins in Barcelona on February 27th. A representative responded to those rumors saying, &#8220;The successor to the Galaxy SII smartphone will be unveiled at a separate Samsung-hosted event in the first half of the year, closer to commercial availability of the product.&#8221;</p>
<p>So there&#8217;s no <span class='bm_keywordlink' id='galaxy-s-i9000-span'><a href="http://www.intomobile.com/phones/samsung/galaxy-s-i9000/">Galaxy S</a></span> III at MWC or at the French event. Maybe the third time&#8217;s a charm?</p>
<p>This rumored device is anticipated to be the king of all Android phones so far. Think only 7mm thin, 2GB of RAM, a Super AMOLED Plus display, an 8MP camera on the back and a 2MP shooter on the front, and of course Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich. Alas, this dream will not become a reality any time soon.</p>
<p>[<a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/07/samsung-debunks-rumors-of-march-22nd-galaxy-s-iii-unveiling/" target="_blank">via BGR</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intomobile.com/2012/02/07/samsung-squashes-hopes-galaxy-s-iii-debuting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Samsung used low-cost LTE chip in the Galaxy Nexus</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2012/02/07/samsung-used-lowcost-lte-chip-galaxy-nexus/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intomobile.com/2012/02/07/samsung-used-lowcost-lte-chip-galaxy-nexus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 20:57:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charles West</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LTE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/?p=311385</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Samsung in an Apple-like way has cut its cost for components, with the installation of a cheaper LTE baseband chip that went into the Verizon Galaxy Nexus. This dirty little secret was exposed when the wildly popular phone was stripped down to its innards, revealing the newer chip. The new chip has the same high-speed data performance as the older version. Now what&#8217;s the big deal, you ask? Well, the newer LTE chip inside the Galaxy Nexus is substantially cheaper than the previous version, as the latest model is estimated to cost half as <span style="white-space:nowrap">... <a href="http://www.intomobile.com/2012/02/07/samsung-used-lowcost-lte-chip-galaxy-nexus/">Read more</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Samsung in an Apple-like way has cut its cost for components, with the installation of a cheaper LTE baseband chip that went into the Verizon Galaxy Nexus. This dirty little secret was exposed when the wildly popular phone was stripped down to its innards, revealing the newer chip. The new chip has the same high-speed data performance as the older version.</p>
<p>Now what&#8217;s the big deal, you ask? Well, the newer LTE chip inside the Galaxy Nexus is substantially cheaper than the previous version, as the latest model is estimated to cost half as much as its $23 predecessor, according ABI Research. The cost shouldn&#8217;t be surprising because this kind of thing tends to happen when consumers are shelling out big money for technology that seems to get better and faster.</p>
<p>In the end, this, without question, is great news for manufacturers who want to bring in these 4G smartphones downmarket and offer them at a lower price point. I guess the big picture is how components are becoming cheaper, but this doesn&#8217;t make smartphones ultimately less expensive &#8212; case in point &#8212; Apple makes over $400 dollars profit from a phone that costs the company slightly less than $200 to make.</p>
<p>[via <a href="http://www.mobileburn.com/18469/news/samsung-used-lower-cost-lte-chip-in-galaxy-nexus">mobileburn</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intomobile.com/2012/02/07/samsung-used-lowcost-lte-chip-galaxy-nexus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Study: Women dig gadgets too</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2012/02/06/study-chicks-diggin-gadgets-too/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intomobile.com/2012/02/06/study-chicks-diggin-gadgets-too/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 23:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>George Tinari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/?p=311195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s a common stereotype that men are far more interested in the latest gadgets than women are. There&#8217;s perhaps no better example of this than Motorola&#8217;s marketing strategy for the Droid line of smartphones: keep it cool, badass and overly aggressive. A study entitled Women in CE from the Consumer Electronics Association, however, is finding that more and more women are expressing a fondness for technology than ever before. Eight in ten women now say they have an interest in consumer electronics and 41 percent of them indicated they were &#8220;very <span style="white-space:nowrap">... <a href="http://www.intomobile.com/2012/02/06/study-chicks-diggin-gadgets-too/">Read more</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a common stereotype that men are far more interested in the latest gadgets than women are. There&#8217;s perhaps no better example of this than Motorola&#8217;s marketing strategy for the Droid line of smartphones: keep it cool, badass and overly aggressive. A study entitled <em>Women in CE</em> from the Consumer Electronics Association, however, is finding that more and more women are expressing a fondness for technology than ever before.</p>
<p>Eight in ten women now say they have an interest in consumer electronics and 41 percent of them indicated they were &#8220;very interested.&#8221; This is an increase of about 10 percent from CEA&#8217;s 2007 <em>The Truth About Women and Consumer Electronics</em> study. You can bet that the rise in smartphones and tablets is helping this cause because these are much more personal devices.</p>
<p>Men typically spend more than women per year in electronics, but the gap is shrinking. Men previously spent around $200 more on average than women, but this latest study tightens the gap to about $61 with men spending $728 per year and women spending $667. 61 percent of women indicated they were at least a part of the decision-making process for buying gadgets, so even if they aren&#8217;t doing the spending, women very well could be a driving force behind it.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s<a href="http://www.intomobile.com/2011/03/08/five-influential-women-mobile-technology/"> plenty of important women working in the CE field</a>, too. <em>IntoMobile</em>‘s own Kelly Hodgkins is a prime example and she can corroborate portions of this study. </p>
<p>&#8220;Just in the last few years, many of my non-technical friends are now rocking an iPhone, iPad or Android device. I also get lots of questions about which camera to buy and which eReader is the best. I can see more and more ladies now stepping up their interest in devices and most are not swayed by pastel products,&#8221; Hodgkins said. &#8220;They may grab a purple case, but they are looking for devices that fit in their palms and their purses, not ones that look pretty in pink.&#8221;</p>
<p>[<a href="http://techcrunch.com/2012/02/06/ll-cool-g-ladies-love-cool-gadgets-too-says-study/" target="_blank">via TechCrunch</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intomobile.com/2012/02/06/study-chicks-diggin-gadgets-too/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How&#8217;s that &#8216;big and bulky&#8217; strategy working out for HTC?</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2012/02/06/so-hows-big-and-bulky-strategy-working-out-htc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intomobile.com/2012/02/06/so-hows-big-and-bulky-strategy-working-out-htc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 21:14:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>George Tinari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/?p=311127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CFO of HTC Winston Yung admitted the company &#8220;dropped the ball&#8221; in 2011 and its high-end devices are not selling as well as expected. This is due mostly to HTC&#8217;s hardware being substantially thicker than the competition and often having poor battery life. &#8220;While short term performance may not meet the results as expected, we have gained further experience and advancement in the areas of brand management and product innovation,&#8221; CEO Peter Chou stated in a press release. &#8220;These fundamental strengths and the groundwork we have laid will take us <span style="white-space:nowrap">... <a href="http://www.intomobile.com/2012/02/06/so-hows-big-and-bulky-strategy-working-out-htc/">Read more</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CFO of HTC Winston Yung admitted the company &#8220;dropped the ball&#8221; in 2011 and its high-end devices are not selling as well as expected. This is due mostly to HTC&#8217;s hardware being substantially thicker than the competition and often having poor battery life.</p>
<p>&#8220;While short term performance may not meet the results as expected, we have gained further experience and advancement in the areas of brand management and product innovation,&#8221; CEO Peter Chou stated in a press release. &#8220;These fundamental strengths and the groundwork we have laid will take us into 2012 with a renewed focus and determination.&#8221; </p>
<p>His message seems to echo the same one given by the company&#8217;s CFO: HTC shit the bed.</p>
<p>The handset manufacturer posted its first profit decline in two years this morning and <a href="http://www.intomobile.com/2012/02/06/htc-our-q1-2012-revenues-going-down-36-we-just-have-keep-hustlin/">expects revenue to drop even further during first quarter</a>. Revenue for the fourth quarter dropped 2.5 percent from Q4 2010 and by over 25 percent from Q3 2011 to $3.44 billion.</p>
<p>HTC was arguably the top Android smartphone vendor in 2010, pumping out <a href="http://www.intomobile.com/2010/06/01/review-sprint-htc-evo-4g-is-it-as-good-as-it-looks/">the first 4G Android phone</a> along with many other successful devices with great combinations of solid hardware and software. But in 2011, the spotlight that once engulfed HTC was very dim at best. 2011 was Samsung&#8217;s year to shine: it had much thinner Android hardware and did an overall better job than anyone at stealing a bit of Apple&#8217;s thunder, <a href="http://www.intomobile.com/2012/01/24/apples-q1-2012-earnings-exceed-expectations/">albeit not a whole lot</a>. Samsung also had a stronger focus on Android handsets, while HTC flip-flopped between Android and Windows Phone in 2011.</p>
<p>[<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/htc-we-dropped-the-ball-with-oversized-lte-phones-06212197/" target="_blank">via SlashGear</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intomobile.com/2012/02/06/so-hows-big-and-bulky-strategy-working-out-htc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More smartphones were shipped than PCs last year</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2012/02/03/report-more-smartphones-were-shipped-than-pcs-2011/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intomobile.com/2012/02/03/report-more-smartphones-were-shipped-than-pcs-2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 22:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>George Tinari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/?p=310679</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Canalys research firm issued a report today that makes us all think back to our very first time getting a blue screen of death on a PC. According to combined statistics from 2011, manufacturers shipped more smartphones than computers in 2011 &#8211; 488 million smartphones hit shelves last year, while only 414.6 million PCs did. Though tablets were supposed to reign in the &#8220;post-PC&#8221; era, the PC numbers do factor in tablet shipments. &#8220;Smart phone shipments overtaking those of client PCs should be seen as a significant milestone,&#8221; VP and <span style="white-space:nowrap">... <a href="http://www.intomobile.com/2012/02/03/report-more-smartphones-were-shipped-than-pcs-2011/">Read more</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Canalys research firm issued a report today that makes us all think back to our very first time getting a blue screen of death on a PC. According to combined statistics from 2011, manufacturers shipped more smartphones than computers in 2011 &#8211; 488 million smartphones hit shelves last year, while only 414.6 million PCs did. Though tablets were supposed to reign in the &#8220;post-PC&#8221; era, the PC numbers do factor in tablet shipments.</p>
<p>&#8220;Smart phone shipments overtaking those of client PCs should be seen as a significant milestone,&#8221; VP and Principal Analyst of Canalys, Chris Jones, commented. &#8220;In the space of a few years, smart phones have grown from being a niche product segment at the high-end of the mobile phone market to becoming a truly mass-market proposition.&#8221;</p>
<p>The 488 million smartphone shipments are up 63 percent from the 299.7 million in 2010. PC shipments grew too, but by 15 percent. Even with tablet growth at a staggering 274 percent in 2011, the PC still couldn&#8217;t keep up with the enormous demand for iOS and Android handsets. However, Canalys interestingly predicts slowed smartphone growth in 2012 &#8220;as vendors exercise greater cost control and discipline, and put more focus on profitability.&#8221; The <a href="http://www.intomobile.com/2011/12/14/galaxy-nexus-now-available-verizon-299-free-overnight-shipping/">rise in $299 Android phones</a> seems to support the latter suggestion, but only time can tell.</p>
<p>Whatever happens in 2012, it&#8217;s clear that the future of computing is changing. </p>
<p>[<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/03/canalys-more-smartphones-than-pcs-shipped-in-2011/" target="_blank">via Engadget</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intomobile.com/2012/02/03/report-more-smartphones-were-shipped-than-pcs-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nokia Lumia 900 pre-orders start at Microsoft</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2012/02/02/nokia-lumia-900-preorders-start-microsoft/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intomobile.com/2012/02/02/nokia-lumia-900-preorders-start-microsoft/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 23:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>George Tinari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nokia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nokia Lumia 900]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/?p=310439</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The highly anticipated Nokia Lumia 900 is now available for pre-order at Microsoft retail stores &#8212; all fifteen of them! Microsoft confirmed you can pre-order one of these devices for $25. That&#8217;s nice, but there&#8217;s still no release date or full price tag. Rumor has it the phone will launch on March 18th for a very aggressive $99 with a two-year contract on AT&#38;T, but there&#8217;s no official word just yet. Once consumers realized Nokia made a winner in the Lumia 800 overseas, an imminent American counterpart only made sense <span style="white-space:nowrap">... <a href="http://www.intomobile.com/2012/02/02/nokia-lumia-900-preorders-start-microsoft/">Read more</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The highly anticipated Nokia Lumia 900 is now available for pre-order at Microsoft retail stores &#8212; all fifteen of them! Microsoft confirmed you can pre-order one of these devices for $25. That&#8217;s nice, but there&#8217;s still no release date or full price tag. Rumor has it the phone will launch on <a href="http://www.intomobile.com/2012/01/25/nokia-lumia-900-land-march-18th-99-price-tag/">March 18th for a very aggressive $99</a> with a two-year contract on AT&amp;T, but there&#8217;s no official word just yet.</p>
<p>Once consumers realized <a href="http://www.intomobile.com/2011/12/07/nokia-lumia-800-sales-through-roof-gives-windows-phone-needed-boost/">Nokia made a winner in the Lumia 800</a> overseas, an imminent American counterpart only made sense for Nokia to fulfill the requests. The Lumia 900 has a larger 4.3-inch display (the 800&#8242;s display spans 3.7 inches) and is the first 4G LTE Windows Phone device. Inside there&#8217;s a 1.4GHz single-core processor, but don&#8217;t underestimate how fast this handset really is in combination with the OS. An 8MP camera is located on the rear and a 1MP camera is on the front.</p>
<p>IntoMobile&#8217;s Marin Perez got a <a href="http://www.intomobile.com/2012/01/09/ces-2012-nokia-lumia-900-att-handson-video/">hands-on with the Nokia Lumia 900</a> at CES 2012 and found it to be quite impressive. It&#8217;s a tad large, but Android users should be more than accustomed to phones similar in size to dinner plates. If the phone seems attractive and you by slim chance happen to live near a Microsoft retail store, head on over and reserve one.</p>
<p>[<a href="http://www.theverge.com/2012/2/2/2767094/nokia-lumia-900-microsoft-retail-store-preorder" target="_blank">via The Verge</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intomobile.com/2012/02/02/nokia-lumia-900-preorders-start-microsoft/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple climbs past LG to become the world&#8217;s #3 phone manufacturer</title>
		<link>http://www.intomobile.com/2012/02/02/apple-climbs-past-lg-become-worlds-3-phone-manufacturer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intomobile.com/2012/02/02/apple-climbs-past-lg-become-worlds-3-phone-manufacturer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 21:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>George Tinari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hottest Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iOS / iPhone OS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LG]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intomobile.com/?p=310225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IDC, a technology research firm, released statistics today on the data it gathered on mobile phone sales in Q4 2011. According to the numbers, Apple is now the third largest phone manufacturer in the world by shipments, surpassing LG. Apple&#8217;s record-breaking iPhone sales last quarter skyrocketed the company into an easy third place, claiming 8.7 percent market share. Nokia and Samsung still hold their respective positions as the top phone manufacturers by a long shot. Last quarter, Nokia shipped 113.5 million mobile phones and Samsung shipped 97.6 million. After that, <span style="white-space:nowrap">... <a href="http://www.intomobile.com/2012/02/02/apple-climbs-past-lg-become-worlds-3-phone-manufacturer/">Read more</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IDC, a technology research firm, released statistics today on the data it gathered on mobile phone sales in Q4 2011. According to the numbers, Apple is now the third largest phone manufacturer in the world by shipments, surpassing LG. <a href="http://www.intomobile.com/2012/01/24/apples-q1-2012-earnings-exceed-expectations/">Apple&#8217;s record-breaking iPhone sales</a> last quarter skyrocketed the company into an easy third place, claiming 8.7 percent market share.</p>
<p>Nokia and Samsung still hold their respective positions as the top phone manufacturers by a long shot. Last quarter, Nokia shipped 113.5 million mobile phones and Samsung shipped 97.6 million. After that, shipments drop significantly to Apple&#8217;s 37 million. Comparably, that doesn&#8217;t seem like a lot, but keep in mind Apple only ships iPhones. That&#8217;s it. Samsung and Nokia ship all sorts of smartphones and basic dumbphones. Looking at it from that perspective, it&#8217;s quite astonishing.</p>
<p>Coming in after Apple is LG with only 17.7 units shipped and ZTE with 17.1. The grand total of mobile phones shipped in Q4 factoring in all other manufacturers as well? 427.4 million. That&#8217;s a year-over-year change of 6.1 percent, which was overall a bit lower than expected.</p>
<p>&#8220;The introduction of high-growth products such as the iPhone 4S, which shipped in the fourth quarter, bolstered smartphone growth. Yet overall market growth fell to its lowest point since 3Q09 when the global economic recession was in full bloom,&#8221; said senior research analyst at IDC, Kevin Restivo.</p>
<p>[<a href="http://www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=prUS23297412">via IDC</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intomobile.com/2012/02/02/apple-climbs-past-lg-become-worlds-3-phone-manufacturer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 4/6 queries in 0.002 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 1365/1365 objects using memcached

Served from: www.intomobile.com @ 2012-02-10 10:28:30 -->
