Nokia N95 vs Sony Cybershot T9

Stefan Constantinescu

Stefan Constantinescu (@WhatTheBit on Twitter) has loved technology since as far back as he can remember. It started with computers, but in the past few years his passion has turned to mobile devices. As a mobile phone enthusiast who lives and breathes devices that connect to the internet, he knows he is not alone with this radical fascination of all things wireless. He is strongly opinionated and enjoys a good debate so leave comments in his posts and he’ll get back to you! Stefan began blogging as a hobby in the fall of 2006 and joined IntoMobile in the summer of 2007. Later he got a job at Nokia in March 2008, but as of June 2009 he has rejoined the IntoMobile team. He is currently based out of Helsinki, Finland.

• mazor

  Indeed from viewing this photos , the T9 wins. It looks like the N95 at ISO100 to ISO400 does not change that much, although there is a difference and ISO100 does look better. The T9 on the other hand excels at ISO100, and is much better than the N95 at ISO100. At ISO400, the T9 suffers from alot of colour noise, and just noise in general, but ins’s non conservative approach to noise reduction sees that details are retained throughout the image.

  Also when comparing the iamge of the spoons and fork on wooden tray, we can see straight away, the T9 renders shiny objects real, whereas N95 the shiny metal looks kind of liquid, almost CGI looking. Also note, the Sony is showing nicer background blur, this is possibly due to T9′s alot bigger sensor. the N95 here too could benefit from a much bigger sensor.