IntoMobile

Breaking news, information, and analysis on the latest mobile phones and mobile technology

Open NavigationOpen Search
  • Home
  • Platforms
    • iOS / iPhone OS
    • Android
    • Windows Phone
    • BlackBerry OS
  • Hardware
    • New Hardware
    • Tablets
    • Reviews
    • Rumors
  • Carriers
    • AT&T
    • Sprint
    • T-Mobile
    • Verizon
  • Manufacturers
    • Apple
    • Samsung
    • HTC
    • LG
    • Motorola
  • Best VPNs
  • Best AI Tools

Samsung trying to become a serious player in the infrastructure game, can they do it?

August 8, 2011 by Stefan Constantinescu - Leave a Comment

Share on Twitter Share on Facebook ( 0 shares )

Samsung, who many of you know for their mobile phones, is also one of the world’s leading suppliers of components. It’s highly likely that there are several chips in your current smartphone that bear the South Korean company’s logo. In fact, Apple is one of Samsung’s largest customers! Looking to expand their business, Samsung has begun a campaign to be taken seriously in Europe as an infrastructure vendor, meaning they want to be the company that an operator can call and say “we need some cell towers, core network equipment, some smartphones, feature phones, and what the hell, throw in some maintenance too!” The list of companies that are currently in a position to do that is very short. There’s Huawei, who is more known for their infrastructure gear, but have recently become increasingly popular due to their budget handsets, and ZTE, who is a controversial infrastructure vendor since some say their gear isn’t up to snuff, but at least they too make super cheap Android smartphones and also provide a wide range of feature phones.

So why is Samsung doing this? IP Hong, Vice President of Marketing at Samsung’s Telecom Systems Business says: “We have the complete package for mobile operators. They need a new vendor in 4G in Europe. We can change the situation in Europe. We are ready to go.” Until recently Samsung didn’t actually sell any gear that supported GSM. This is due to the country where they’re active, South Korea, relying on CDMA. That situation has now changed and Samsung’s equipment does GSM, LTE, WCDMA, WiMAX, and CDMA. Will European operators bite though? Is Samsung going to outbid their competitors and take a loss just so they can establish themselves as credible? We’ll see what happens.

If we were Ericsson or Nokia Siemens Networks, we’d be worried, especially after Everything Everywhere signed a massive deal with Huawei. Operators are indeed examining their options.

Share on Twitter Share on Facebook ( 0 shares )

Back to top ▴

Back to top ▴

Follow IntoMobile

38k
36k
4k
13k
12k

Most Recent Posts

  • Realme C100i launches in India: Big battery, budget price, but is it worth it?
  • Redmi Note 17 Pro Max review: Xiaomi’s first 10,000mAh phone is a battery monster
  • FWA was supposed to save rural America’s internet. cities want in too.
  • Vivo X500 Pro will be the first phone with a 2nm Dimensity chip
  • Huawei Mate XT 2 could track your health — and that changes everything about foldables

Get Updates Via E-Mail

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

About IntoMobile

  • About IntoMobile
  • Contact IntoMobile
  • Send us News Tips
  • Privacy Policy

Social Links

  • IntoMobile on Facebook
  • IntoMobile on Twitter
  • IntoMobile on Google+
  • IntoMobile on YouTube

Copyright © 2006-2021 IntoMobile. All rights reserved.