IntoMobile

Breaking news, information, and analysis on the latest mobile phones and mobile technology

Open NavigationOpen Search
  • Home
  • Platforms
    • iOS / iPhone OS
    • Android
    • Windows Phone
    • BlackBerry OS
  • Hardware
    • New Hardware
    • Tablets
    • Reviews
    • Rumors
  • Carriers
    • AT&T
    • Sprint
    • T-Mobile
    • Verizon
  • Manufacturers
    • Apple
    • Samsung
    • HTC
    • LG
    • Motorola
  • Best VPNs
  • Best AI Tools

T-Mobile under fire in Washington state over its no-contract advertising

April 25, 2013 by Kelly Hodgkins - 1 Comment

Share on Twitter Share on Facebook

T-Mobile is looking to shake up the mobile marketplace as the uncarrier. It’s first challenge isn’t going to be customer adoption, but an overeager attorney general looking to challenge the carrier’s no-contract marketing. According to a report in the Seattle Times, Bob Ferguson, Attorney General for the state of Washington, filed a complaint against the carrier’s no-contract advertising claiming it was deceptive.

Ferguson argued that T-Mobile’s Simple Choice plan was much more complex than advertised and that the terms of the plan and its device payment options were not disclosed in the fine print. He released the following statement with his complaint along with a suggested resolution.

After an investigation of the company’s practices, the Attorney General’s Office learned that the company failed to disclose that customers who purchase a phone using the 24-month payment plan must carry a wireless service agreement with T-Mobile for the entire 24 months— or pay the full balance owed on phone if they cancel earlier.

Consumers who cancel their wireless service face an unanticipated balloon payment for the phone equipment – in most cases higher than termination fees for other wireless carriers depending on how early they cancel. Instead of a “two-year sentence” for wireless service, consumers face a different two-year “sentence” to avoid a lump-sum balloon payment for the phone.

T-Mobile, ironically represented by former Washington Attorney General Rob McKenna, disagreed with the claims, but still voluntarily submitted to the arrangement offered by Ferguson.

As America’s Un-carrier, our goal is to increase transparency with our customers, unleashing them from restrictive long-term service contracts – this kind of simple, straight forward approach is core to the new company we are building. While we believe our advertising was truthful and appropriate, we voluntarily agreed to this arrangement with the Washington AG in this spirit.

As part of its settlement, T-Mobile must also pay legal fees of $26,000. No consumers have complained about T-Mobile’s advertising, but if they do, they now have recourse to return their phones and cancel the payment plan without any additional fees

[Via The Seattle Times and Ars Technica]

Share on Twitter Share on Facebook

Back to top ▴

Back to top ▴

Follow IntoMobile

38k
36k
4k
13k
12k

Most Recent Posts

  • iPhone Duo launches on time, but finding one is another story
  • One UI 9.0 lets you move your Galaxy Tab taskbar icons left or right
  • ColorOS 17 goes global and OPPO is swinging hard on speed, smoothness, and AI
  • Apple HomeView is here, and it wants to be the center of your home
  • Apple’s new Apple TV 4K gets hands-free Siri and four-speaker surround sound

About IntoMobile

  • About IntoMobile
  • Contact IntoMobile
  • Send us News Tips
  • Privacy Policy

Social Links

  • IntoMobile on Facebook
  • IntoMobile on Twitter
  • IntoMobile on Google+
  • IntoMobile on YouTube

Copyright © 2006-2021 IntoMobile. All rights reserved.