Holiday Gift Guide »

Image Comparison: Nikon Coolpix 5000 vs Nokia N93

Categories:
By: , IntoMobile
Tuesday, January 16th, 2007 at 1:44 PM

Conclusion: The N93 pictures needed to be touched up before getting remotely close to the quality of a Nikon.

Check out this short duel over at The Creative Life

I personally can’t wait to see how the N95 stacks up against a decent point and shoot. I also have to wonder why Nokia is using Carl Zeiss optics? There are better solutions out there. COUGH Canon COUGH

Via: WOM World

About The Author

Stefan Constantinescu

Stefan Constantinescu (@WhatTheBit on Twitter) has loved technology since as far back as he can remember. It started with computers, but in the past few years his passion has turned to mobile devices. As a mobile phone enthusiast who lives and breathes devices that connect to the internet, he knows he is not alone with this radical fascination of all things wireless. He is strongly opinionated and enjoys a good debate so leave comments in his posts and he’ll get back to you! Stefan began blogging as a hobby in the fall of 2006 and joined IntoMobile in the summer of 2007. Later he got a job at Nokia in March 2008, but as of June 2009 he has rejoined the IntoMobile team. He is currently based out of Helsinki, Finland.

  • James @ The Creative Life

    ‘Th short duel’, now why didn’t I think of that? That’s a much better name for the shot out!

  • James @ The Creative Life

    Oh dear . . . why is my typing so poor? Sorry. Obviously I meant ‘The short duel’ and ‘shoot out’. :0(

  • Stefan Constantinescu

    hehe don’t worry about it

    if it wasn’t for firefox 2 or microsoft word i would be labeled an analphabet by now

  • kainor

    Carl Zeiss has big time brand recognition :-/ Same reason Sony uses them, I imagine..

  • Stefan Constantinescu

    Yea and do you see people serious about photography buying Sony cameras …

    Nikon, Canon, Leica, Sigma: these are brands that I associate with photography.

    not carl zeiss