How the iPhone and Apple products stay years ahead of the competition

steve-jobs

Remember back when Steve Jobs announced the iPhone in January 2007? Everyone thought it was a phone from the future, and it completely upended the smartphone industry. We’d seen touchscreens before, but none quite as elegant or responsive as the one Apple used for the iPhone. Why did it take so long for competitors, namely Android, to make a halfway decent capacitive touchscreen? And why did so many others before even bother with those annoying, inaccurate resistive touchscreens?

This is just one of many examples of Apple’s ability to get in on high-quality components and mass production of those components early. The following is an interesting answer to a question on Quora regarding Apple’s knack for staying ahead of its competitors in terms of designing and building hardware and components:

Apple actually uses its cash hoard in a very interesting way to maintain a decisive advantage over its rivals: When new component technologies (touchscreens, chips, LED displays) first come out, they are very expensive to produce, and building a factory that can produce them in mass quantities is even more expensive. Oftentimes, the upfront capital expenditure can be so huge and the margins are small enough (and shrink over time as the component is rapidly commoditized) that the companies who would build these factories cannot raise sufficient investment capital to cover the costs.

What Apple does is use its cash hoard to pay for the construction cost (or a significant fraction of it) of the factory in exchange for exclusive rights to the output production of the factory for a set period of time (maybe 6 – 36 months), and then for a discounted rate afterwards. This yields two advantages:

 

  1. Apple has access to new component technology months or years before its rivals. This allows it to release groundbreaking products that are actually impossible to duplicate. Remember how for up to a year or so after the introduction of the iPhone, none of the would-be iPhone clones could even get a capacitive touchscreen to work as well as the iPhone’s? It wasn’t just the software – Apple simply has access to new components earlier, before anyone else in the world can gain access to it in mass quantities to make a consumer device. One extraordinary example of this is the aluminum machining technology used to make Apple’s laptops – this remains a trade secret that Apple continues to have exclusive access to and allows them to make laptops with (for now) unsurpassed strength and lightness.
  2. Eventually its competitors catch up in component production technology, but by then Apple has their arrangement in place whereby it can source those parts at a lower cost due to the discounted rate they have negotiated with the (now) most-experienced and skilled provider of those parts – who has probably also brought his production costs down too. This discount is also potentially subsidized by its competitors buying those same parts from that provider – the part is now commoditized so the factory is allowed to produce them for all buyers, but Apple gets special pricing.

Apple is not just crushing its rivals through superiority in design, Steve Jobs’s deep experience in hardware mass production (early Apple, NeXT) has been brought to bear in creating an unrivaled exclusive supply chain of advanced technology literally years ahead of anyone else on the planet. If it feels like new Apple products appear futuristic, it is because Apple really is sending back technology from the future.

Once those technologies (or more accurately, their mass production techniques) become sufficiently commoditized, Apple is then able to compete effectively on cost and undercut rivals. It’s a myth that Apple only makes premium products – it makes them all right, but that is because they are literally more advanced than anything else (i.e. the price premium is not just for design), and once the product line is no longer premium, they are produced more cheaply than competitor equivalents, yielding higher margins, more cash, which results in more ability to continue the cycle.

By controlling hardware production and undercutting its competitors, one could easily argue that Apple is controlling not just its entire product line (hardware and software), but perhaps even the entire market. To this day, it’s hard to argue that anyone else has come close to Apple’s build quality, product tolerances and designs.

What do you think? Is this really how Apple has maintained a strong advantage with the iPhone, iPad tablet and its Mac line of computers?

[Via: TiPB]

  • Mkinsey29

    Sorry Marc, but I’ll have to disagree. While Apple may have some of the best build quality out there, their devices are absolutely not years, months, or even days ahead of the competition from a technology standpoint. They are usually the ones behind or being the late adopters. Whether this is them waiting on new technology to mature or wanting to form it right instead of rushing things out, they are not the bleeding edge of tech.

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_CRM3HRNZT7YYHBDL33E63NKMMY royland

      you are so right,what in the heck is dude talking about.

    • Anonymous

      Interesting, because I do remember RIM thinking that it was impossible that the iPhone, with its full, bright touchscreen display and innards, would have enough battery power to last a day. Also interesting is that it took other smartphones over a year to develop capacitive touchscreens with the accuracy and responsiveness of the iPhone–most phones were using resistive touchscreens. Moreover, Apple’s use of steel, aluminum and glass was unheard of in an era where nearly all smartphones made heavy use of plastics and faux-metals.

      • Anonymous

        Yup, when it 1st came out it was different but NOT more advanced tech-wize!
        Since then, Apple made 3 more phones that look, act and feel the same, no innovation since 2007.
        They only add things cause bloggers were complaining that its missing stuff that they knew from other smart-phones.

  • Guest

    Samsung Galaxy Skin… nuff said really.

  • Anonymous

    Wow…. what a misunderstanding of the industry, this article is sad!
    Apple implementation is good, but saying they are a head of others tech-wize… way off.
    What I mean is, when the iPhone came out and we saw for the 1st’ time in a phone with rotating UI  I remember saying to myself, “hey they stole it from cannons cameras…” so yes, the implmetation is new, not the tech, ever! Apple likes to claim they invented a lot, they haven’t. Nothing that they put in thier products is new, show me one thing tech-wize that is NEW from Apple, nothing.

    “it’s hard to argue that anyone else has come close to Apple’s build
    quality” are you kidding me?!?, my god, you guys like Apple so much, just change the name of your website to intoapple.com

    P.S
    Apple loves tech so much, light years ahead of others, still can’t send files via blue-tooth…

  • Anonymous

    So now on some articles you guys moderate the comments(by length? author? who knows)… great journalism intomobile, really!

    Waiting for my reply to appear….

  • http://twitter.com/#!/PitoVH787 Pito V.H

    APPLE IS THE FUTURE…THE OTHER COMPANIES JUST FOLLOW AND COPY APPLE…..

    • Anonymous

      Let me guess… before your iPhone you had a Motorola Razr!
      HeHe… no wonder you think the iPhone is good. :)

      • http://twitter.com/#!/PitoVH787 Pito V.H

        jajaj back in the days a have LG’S CELL jajaj and a htc mogul went they drop the iphone yes i got one and it was the best i never use my htc no more it have a pen i was like hell no jajajaja i love Apple design… i got the g2x and for real love my jailbrake IPHONE 4

Back to top ▴