Contact Us
We love getting feedback from our readers - we'd love to hear what you liked or disliked, what you'd like to see in the future, or simply what you think of IntoMobile. No suggestion or critique is too small or overlooked.
Contact
HP, who in February said they’d support Microsoft and their Windows Phone 7 mobile operating system, but then went ahead and purchased Palm in April for $1.2 billion, has recently said that they’re going to stick to webOS, and only webOS, for their smartphones going forward.
Not that HP ever made any good smartphones to begin with. Compaq was the company who made interesting personal digital assistants, with specifications such as built in WiFi and a 640 x 480 screen in the iPaq hx4700 which was released in 2004. HP bought Compaq, took the brand, and basically did nothing with them. HP just wanted to grow, and Compaq’s desktop computer business offered them those precious percentage points of market share to leverage future business contracts.
After HP purchased Palm we at IntoMobile all chimed in with our thought, you can read that piece here, and I just want to repeat what I said back then:
“I’m one of those people who has long memories of Palm. I’ve had several Palm OS devices and during high school, while taking advanced placement courses, I even used a Palm connected to a serial keyboard to take notes. I, along with many other folks, want to see them survive, but I don’t think this deal with Palm will do anything. I hope the future will prove me wrong.”
I still hold the same opinion today. So HP is skipping Windows Phone 7 … who really cares, did you expect them to make something worth your while anyway? When was the last time you saw an iPaq and had gadget lust? More importantly for HP going forward, when was the last time you saw a Palm device and had a burning hole in your wallet?
I bet the answer to both those question isn’t too reassuring for stockholders.
[Via: Mobile Business Briefing]
Palm's WebOS phones are pretty good. The web browser is WebKit, which is important, as it is pretty well the fastest around. WebOS multitasking is the best out of any smartphone ever built.
For those 2 reasons alone, I think a HP WebOS machine will give a better experience than a Windows Phone 7 machine.
WebOS is also more mature than Windows Phone 7. WebOS is relatively bug free and already has the features we want, like Cut-&-Paste. Because of WebOS's maturity, we'll see it on a slate device years before we see Windows Phone 7 on a slate.
HP is therefore ahead of Microsoft's game, so it's logical it ditched Windows Phone 7. I'm not a WebOS fanatic, my next handset will probably be Android, but I think WebOS is definitely a step ahead of WP7.