IntoMobile

Breaking news, information, and analysis on the latest mobile phones and mobile technology

Open NavigationOpen Search
  • Home
  • Platforms
    • iOS / iPhone OS
    • Android
    • Windows Phone
    • BlackBerry OS
  • Hardware
    • New Hardware
    • Tablets
    • Reviews
    • Rumors
  • Carriers
    • AT&T
    • Sprint
    • T-Mobile
    • Verizon
  • Manufacturers
    • Apple
    • Samsung
    • HTC
    • LG
    • Motorola
  • Best VPNs
  • Best AI Tools

Does AT&T’s network suck because the company didn’t configure it properly?

October 26, 2009 by Stefan Constantinescu - 1 Comment

Share on Twitter Share on Facebook ( 0 shares )

Brough Turner, who has been working in the telecommunications industry since 1983, has a hypothesis: AT&T’s wireless network has configuration problems. He believes that the size of the buffer in “the last router between the high capacity core network and the actual over-the-air data path to a subscriber” is configured improperly, and that it is causing ping times to either be very good, under 200 milliseconds, or horrible, in some cases reaching as high as 8 seconds. Many iPhone users can attest to this on AT&T, it either works wonderfully or doesn’t work at all.

I find it odd that of all the countries that have GSM technology, America has not figured out how to properly implement a wireless network properly. Now I know the argument for the iPhone failing in big cities is conjestion, but this recent tweet from Eric Zeman, Editor at Phone Scoop, is telling:

Friend of mine just called me from Shanghai. China Mobile kept his call connected through his entire commute of 25 miles.

In 2007 Shanghai had a population density of 13,400 people per square kilometer. It ranked as the 10th most dense city in the world. The most dense American city is Los Angeles with 2,700 people per square kilometer; it ranks 90th. Why is it then that the Chinese can figure out how to use GSM, and the Americans can’t? Seriously, I’m always blown away when I hear horror stories about people finding “dead zones”. The closest thing to a “dead zone” I found in Finland was on a summer holiday in a cabin with a few of my friends in the middle of no where. I had full signal, but mobile data wasn’t supported so I had to rely on voice and SMS instead of email and Twitter.

Brough isn’t saying AT&T doesn’t have enough cell towers up. That’s a given. What he is saying is that the towers that are already up, the wireless network itself, isn’t setup properly. I wouldn’t be surprised if he was right.

[Via: Slashdot]

Share on Twitter Share on Facebook ( 0 shares )

Back to top ▴

Back to top ▴

Follow IntoMobile

38k
36k
4k
13k
12k

Most Recent Posts

  • Xiaomi Mix Fold 5 leaked specs suggest price jump and major camera upgrade
  • Vivo X500 specs leak reveals Dimensity 9500 chip and massive 7,500mAh battery
  • AT&T launches $3 unlimited iPad data passes for short-term use
  • Honor introduces virtual permissions to shield user data from apps
  • Realme P4R arrives in India with massive 8,000mAh battery and 144Hz display

Get Updates Via E-Mail

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

About IntoMobile

  • About IntoMobile
  • Contact IntoMobile
  • Send us News Tips
  • Privacy Policy

Social Links

  • IntoMobile on Facebook
  • IntoMobile on Twitter
  • IntoMobile on Google+
  • IntoMobile on YouTube

Copyright © 2006-2021 IntoMobile. All rights reserved.