IntoMobile

Breaking news, information, and analysis on the latest mobile phones and mobile technology

Open NavigationOpen Search
  • Home
  • Platforms
    • iOS / iPhone OS
    • Android
    • Windows Phone
    • BlackBerry OS
  • Hardware
    • New Hardware
    • Tablets
    • Reviews
    • Rumors
  • Carriers
    • AT&T
    • Sprint
    • T-Mobile
    • Verizon
  • Manufacturers
    • Apple
    • Samsung
    • HTC
    • LG
    • Motorola
  • Best VPNs
  • Best AI Tools

Qualcomm invents easy to remember product names for the Snapdragon, no one but the press really cares

August 8, 2011 by Stefan Constantinescu - Leave a Comment

Share on Twitter Share on Facebook ( 0 shares )

Every time a new Android phone comes out, odds are there’s a Qualcomm chip inside. Whenever we cover said new device, we say things like “the HTC Thunderbolt packs the Qualcomm MSM8655”, which means absolutely nothing to you until we run some benchmarks and compare it to what else is out on the market. Last week Qualcomm aimed to make their chips easier to identify by coming up with a new naming convention: S1, S2, S3, and S4. The Nexus One has an S1 chip inside, the HTC Thunderbolt has an S2 chip, the HTC EVO 3D has an S3, and S4 will be used for next generation products hitting the market towards the end of this year, though more likely the beginning of 2012. None of this matters of course because a device like the Google/HTC Nexus One, despite having an ancient processor, runs an unmodified version of Android and can thus feel faster to operatre than the latest dual core beasts on the market that have a user interfaced that’s been meticulously molested by handset vendors all in the name of differentiation.

More importantly, why should you care about S1/S2/S3/S4 when no one else uses it? How does a 1 GHz S1 compare to an 800 MHz S2? The faster GPU in the S2 makes things feel silky smooth and because it also uses a 45 nanometer chipset, it also has better battery life. But of course in order for us to express those sentiments we need to go in depth and thus make the new naming convention absolutely pointless. When we cover products with chips from Texas Instruments, Samsung, NVIDIA, or ST-Ericsson inside, we need to talk about things that can’t be summed up by any marketing document; instead we have to take a holistic view of the mobile chipset space.

Will the new product names make things easier for you to discern what the best smartphone on the market is right now? Probably not. Will they make things easier for us when covering the latest devices? Again, highly unlikely. It’s not that we don’t love Qualcomm, they’re one of our favorite companies, but sometimes we just have to wonder what their marketing department is trying to do.

If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.

Share on Twitter Share on Facebook ( 0 shares )

Back to top ▴

Back to top ▴

Follow IntoMobile

38k
36k
4k
13k
12k

Most Recent Posts

  • TECNO expands EllaClaw AI agent with cross-app automation and device management tools
  • Chrome brings smarter autofill to iOS and Android through Google Wallet
  • Honor is testing hardware-level privacy screen tech for its next flagship
  • Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 8, Fold 8, and Fold 8 Ultra: every color and storage option leaked
  • Samsung Galaxy M47 launches June 29 with Snapdragon chip and six years of updates

Get Updates Via E-Mail

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

About IntoMobile

  • About IntoMobile
  • Contact IntoMobile
  • Send us News Tips
  • Privacy Policy

Social Links

  • IntoMobile on Facebook
  • IntoMobile on Twitter
  • IntoMobile on Google+
  • IntoMobile on YouTube

Copyright © 2006-2021 IntoMobile. All rights reserved.